Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Smart Bombs: Military, Defense, National Security and More

The AR-15 Isn’t an Assault Rifle Nor Is it a Weapon of War

AR-15 History
Image: Creative Commons.

With President Joe Biden in the White House and Democrat control of the House of Representatives and the United States Senate, owners of AR-15 and similar firearms have a valid reason for concern. Such guns have been targeted for legislation including registration, increased background checks, and even outright bans.

Many who want to see such firearms banned try to use terms that, while sound scary, don’t really apply to the AR-15.

The Assault Rifle Claim

The AR-15 platform has been singled out by opponents of the Second Amendment, using the worrying phrase “assault weapon,” a term embraced all too often by the mainstream media. The firearms industry has countered by more accurately describing those firearms as “modern assault rifles.”

However, an assault weapon typically is selective fire, meaning it can fire in a semi-automatic mode where the trigger needs to be pulled to fire each round; or in automatic mode where the weapon operates like a machine gun. An AR-15 has no selective fire mode, as fully-automatic weapons are banned by U.S. law.

A Weapon of War? 

Adding fuel to the fire, so to speak, as the National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF) has noted, “Though the semiautomatic design used in today’s pistols, rifles and shotguns was invented in the late-nineteenth century and was popularly sold to consumers in America and Europe in the early twentieth century, the modern sporting rifle has been called a ‘weapon of war’ by those who want to ban them.”

The ‘weapons of war’ moniker is largely based on the general appearance, but there are significant differences.

High-Powered?

Additionally, the media – and many politicians – also try to confuse the matter by using the adjective “high-powered” when referring to assault weapons and even modern sporting rifles. This is factually incorrect in both cases.

The first assault weapons developed during World War II actually were chambered in a new “intermediate” round that was larger than the pistol rounds used in pistols and submachine guns, and the rounds used in the main battle rifles of the era. In fact, today in most cases a modern sporting rifle is chambered in calibers less powerful than commonly used big-game cartridges including .30-06 Springfield (.30 caliber) and .300 Winchester Magnum.

Because it isn’t as powerful, it doesn’t have the same “kick” or recoil of those larger rifles, and that fact has made the AR-15 popular with sport shooters.

According to NSSF numbers, there were more than 16 million modern sporting rifles owned by civilians in 2018, and that number likely greatly increased in 2020 with many first time buyers embracing the platform.

Military Guns, A Forgotten History

M4 Carbine. Image: Creative Commons.

There is another important component to this story that even supporters of the Second Amendment fail to note. Until the passage of the National Firearms Act in 1934, it wasn’t that unusual for civilians to own weapons on par – and even better than – what the U.S. military used.

An argument used by opponents of the Second Amendment is that the founding fathers wouldn’t have allowed private ownership of even our modern sporting rifles, but that fails to understand that those same men expected the citizens to have access to the same weapons as the military.

During the American Revolution, it was weapons such as the Pennsylvania and Kentucky Long Rifles that proved superior to the British Long Pattern Musket (Brown Bess) and other “military” long guns of the era. Throughout the 19th century, civilian firearms were no less accurate or powerful than what the military carried. And while the U.S. Army carried the Model 1873 “Trapdoor” Springfield, a slow to reload single-round rifle, repeating rifles were market to consumers.

It also wasn’t until the late 19th century that rifles carried by the U.S. military were arguably superior to what civilians had access to. Only during the First World War were some weapons, such as the Browning Automatic Rifle (BAR), restricted to military sales that were by contract and not actually to keep civilians from owning the weapons. In fact, after the war Colt Arms Company did produce the Colt Automatic Machine Rifle Model 1919, which was even made up of BARs intended for the military.

The BAR didn’t sell well because the price was simply too high for most consumers. Other gun makers faced similar issues.

Auto-Ordnance marketed its Thompson Submachine Gun for private sales to ranchers and security companies, but as with the BAR, the cost – which was on par with a new car – was the issue. However, the weapons were still available to those who could afford them.

All that changed with the passage of the NFA, which actually restricted civilian ownership of such firearms.

But the point remains that for much of the country’s history the difference between military and civilian firearms was blurred. Moreover, no soldier today would want to go into battle today with a civilian AR-15 when given the opportunity to use true military firearms such as the M4 Carbine or M249 machine gun. Those are the actual weapons of war, whilst the AR-15 is a gun designed for the shooting range and remains a top choice for home defense.

Peter Suciu is a Michigan-based writer who has contributed to more than four dozen magazines, newspapers, and websites. He regularly writes about military small arms and is the author of several books on military headgear including A Gallery of Military Headdress, which is available on Amazon.com.

Peter Suciu
Written By

Peter Suciu is a Michigan-based writer who has contributed to more than four dozen magazines, newspapers and websites. He is the author of several books on military headgear including A Gallery of Military Headdress, which is available on Amazon.com.

8 Comments

8 Comments

  1. Avatar

    PopSeal

    February 19, 2021 at 8:49 am

    Facts don’t matter when the narrative is set, the voting machine fix is in, and the insatiable lust for power over their victims now drives leftist policy.

  2. Avatar

    Tommyboy

    February 19, 2021 at 10:57 am

    A Mossberg 500 series hunting shotgun (perhaps the most popular shotgun for the last 50 years) is a weapon of war – the US Army currently uses the Mossberg 590. The most popular hand gun in the world, a 9mm semi-auto, is a weapon of war – the US Army uses a Sig Saur 9mm pistol. The Remington 700 deer rifle is a weapon of war – until a few years ago a version of the Remington 700 was the standard US Army sniper rifle. The AR-15 has never been used by the US Army and is not a weapon of war.

  3. Avatar

    Dantes

    February 19, 2021 at 11:22 am

    It is a mistake to argue that specific firearms are not weapons of war. You’re accepting the false narrative that citizens should not be allowed to possess weapons of war.

    There is not a single firearm design which has not at one time been a weapon of war, beginning with muskets and muzzle-loaders, revolvers, shotguns, single shot pistols (the Liberator) semiautomatic handguns, bolt action rifles, etc.

    Similarly, accepting the premise that it is proper to argue whether a gun is ‘high powered’ or not is falling into the liberals trap. All firearms are deadly if misused. Just as any other tool, such as a chainsaw or car, is dangerous.

    The proper response is that firearms have been used as weapons of war, but we possess and use firearms as weapons of peace. The firearm isn’t the issue. The person who owns and uses it is the issue.

    BTW…there was a military, full automatic AR-15 issued in the 1960s to the Air Force, I believe, and is stamped AR-15. I know, because I legally own it.

  4. Avatar

    Doc

    February 19, 2021 at 11:38 am

    Weapon of War is a term that 2nd amendment proponents should not acknowledge.

    It is a false dilemma invented by gun grabbers to justify registration/confiscation of all firearms. As many know there are
    no weapons that have not been used in war. Don’t enable the gun grabbers.

  5. Avatar

    Charlie

    February 19, 2021 at 3:11 pm

    The firearms industry does not refer to the AR-15 and its derivatives as “modern assault rifles.” (Use of the “assault” term is a (ahem) “trigger” for gun controllers’ sensibilities.) Rather, they refer to them as “modern SPORTING rifles.”

  6. Avatar

    Roger Beeman

    February 19, 2021 at 9:49 pm

    I think you meant “modern sporting rifle” instead of “modern assault rifle” where you mentioned what the firearms makers call them…

  7. Avatar

    Edmond Ramirez

    February 21, 2021 at 12:51 am

    The first paragraph in https://www.therepublicstandardnews.com/trsn_aug_26_2019_013.htm

    The Government of the United States of America is the very Government from which our Founding Fathers protected the American Citizen with the 2nd Amendment. The Founding Fathers were worried that the American Government might evolve into a ‘people by the Government.’ “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” The 2nd Amendment to the United States Constitution allows American citizens to protect themselves from a Government moving to usurp our Democracy and ‘The Bill of Rights – protection by force of arms by American Citizens if needs be. The United States Government, therefore, is guilty of assiduously attenuating the 2nd Amendment by skullduggerous political rationales, pandering to the ‘fad’ of fear.

    NO AMERICAN GOVERNMENT HAS THE RIGHT TO “INFRINGE” ON AN AMERICAN’S RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS
    The Government of the United States of America is the very Government from which our Founding Fathers protected the American Citizen with the 2nd Amendment. The Founding Fathers were worried that the American Government might evolve into a ‘people by the
    Government.’ “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” The 2nd Amendment to the United States Constitution allows American citizens to protect themselves from a Government moving to usurp our Democracy and ‘The Bill of Rights – protection by force of arms by American Citizens if needs be. The United States Government, therefore, is guilty of assiduously attenuating the 2nd Amendment by skullduggerous political rationales, pandering to the ‘fad’ of fear.

    NO AMERICAN GOVERNMENT HAS THE RIGHT TO “INFRINGE” ON AN AMERICAN’S RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS

  8. Avatar

    James Speed

    February 22, 2021 at 3:54 pm

    You should edit this story, Fully Automatic weapons are NOT illegal or prohibited by law. There are over 675,000 FULLY AUTOMATIC weapons in the hands of the American public. IF you can pass a background check and pay $200 tax stamp, you can buy most any of them. Some however require an FFL.. but many do not. You can buy an automatic that was made and registered with the ATF before May 19th 1986 from an FFL dealer. But, It is illegal to purchase one made after 1986. It is illegal to import them. It’s the same procedure as buying a silencer or suppressor. Fill out all the paper work, send it in with a picture of yourself and your fingerprints from the sheriffs dept. Pay $200 for the BATF tax stamp and pay the fees for the paperwork= $235

    https://rocketffl.com/who-can-own-a-full-auto-machine-gun/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Advertisement