Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Smart Bombs: Military, Defense, National Security and More

Montana: The Super Battleship the U.S. Navy Passed On

Montana-class Battleship

Oh, what could have been.

The U.S. Navy planned for the Montana-class to be the successors to the powerful Iowa-class battleships, and as such would have been larger in nearly every respect: longer, wider, with greater displacement, and three more 16-inch guns.

Such a design was made possible due to the United States’ Naval Act of 1938, which mandated a massive 20% increase in American naval strength in response to the German annexation of Austria and the Japanese invasion of China. The act freed the Navy from the design restrictions imposed by the Washington and London Naval Treaties that placed strict limits on naval construction after World War I in order to prevent a naval arms race.

Free to design a ship without treaty restrictions, the Navy settled on the Montana-class design. The new battleship had to be better protected and better armed than the Iowas and capable of withstanding hits from its own armor-piercing shells. The design was so much larger than previous American battleships that Navy planners also included a new lock design for the Panama Canal in order to accommodate the enormous ships.

Montana-Class: A Battleship Like No Other 

Montana’s main guns would have numbered twelve 16-inch guns arranged into 4 armored turrets of three guns each, up from the Iowa-class’ 9 guns. They only fired two types of shells: a 2,700 pound armor-piercing projectile for use against enemy ships, or a 1,900 pound high-explosive round for targets on land or unarmored targets. Both projectiles could be fired a whopping 24 miles.

The massive turrets that would have housed the guns were heavily armored and required nearly 100 men each to operate, and weighed about 250,000 pounds each. Though they could rotate rather quickly despite their enormous size, they were not fixed to the ship, and in case any of the Montanas capsized, their turrets would slip out and sink, lightening the ship considerably.

Even Montana’s secondary battery was impressive: twenty 5-inch guns arranged around the ship’s central superstructure, ten to each side. The guns played a dual role: they could hit targets on the surface at a distance of nearly 15 miles, or when pointed skywards could engage aerial targets at more than 50,000 feet.

In addition to Montana’s formidable offensive and defense weapons, its armor protection was equally astounding. The ship’s four turrets were one of the most heavily protected parts of the ship and designed to withstand some of World War II’s heaviest weapons: the turret faces were fully 22 and a half inches thick.

Ultimately the Montana-class never went into production. Naval air battles like the Battle of Coral Sea and Midway affirmed the utility of naval airpower and led to the Navy prioritizing aircraft carriers and the then-current Iowa-class battleships over the new Montana-class.

Still, had the Montana-class entered production, it would have been the most powerful American battleship ever built. Too bad we never got to see her set sail, as it would have been historic. 

Caleb Larson is a defense writer based in Europe. He holds a Master of Public Policy and covers U.S. and Russian security, European defense issues, and German politics and culture.

Written By

Caleb Larson, a defense journalist based in Europe and holds a Master of Public Policy degree from the Willy Brandt School of Public Policy. He lives in Berlin and writes on U.S. and Russian foreign and defense policy, German politics and culture.



  1. pop seal

    April 2, 2021 at 8:25 am

    Japan’s Yamato and her sister ship ? Sunk by airplanes!

  2. jim slade

    April 2, 2021 at 10:02 am

    This is likely not correct:

    “they were not fixed to the ship, and in case any of the Montanas capsized, their turrets would slip out and sink, lightening the ship considerably.”

    The turrets on U.S. Battleships were secured to the ship. It is unlikely the Montanas would have deviated from the past practice of installing holding down clips below rotating track to keep the turrets in place.

  3. Frederick Baumann

    April 2, 2021 at 10:20 am

    Neither of the Japanese super-heavy battleships ever got within range of an American surface vessel — which proved that the age of the battleship as the decisive weapon in control of the seas had at last come to an end.

    Favorite line from the article: “Though they could rotate rather quickly despite their enormous size, [the Montana’s planned turrets] were not fixed to the ship, and in case any of the Montanas capsized, their turrets would slip out and sink, lightening the ship considerably.” What a terrific consolation to all concerned!

  4. Joe Dokes

    April 2, 2021 at 10:30 am

    As a result, the hull of the Montana became the basis for the aircraft carrier Midway.

  5. Nik Simpson

    April 2, 2021 at 11:06 am

    Montana’s turrets would have weighed *A LOT* more than 250,000lbs which is only 125 tons. For reference, Yamato’s turrets weighed roughly 3000 tons each.

  6. David Neel

    April 2, 2021 at 11:05 pm

    Montana class Battleships did go into production. The U.S.S. Montana was half completed with work beginning on two others when the construction was canceled. The bow of the Montana lives on as the bow of the U.S.S Wisconsin. After Battleship Wisconsin collided with another ship the bow of the cancelled and uncompleted

  7. Brian C Reeves

    April 3, 2021 at 8:56 am

    I wish we would build her now. I’m 72 but as a retired Master Chief Boiler Technician I could still light her 12 boilers off and bring up steam to get underway. I sure do miss the Navy!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *