Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Hermit Kingdom

North Korea’s Underwater Nuclear Weapons (SLBMs): A Game Changer or Not?

North Korea SLBM
Image: A Screenshot from KCNA TV.

North Korea is continuing to advance its ballistic missile capabilities, including demonstrated progress in its short-range ballistic missile capabilities through recent tests of what North Korea described as a new type of tactical guided missile.

One area of potentially significant continued development is in North Korea’s submarine-launched ballistic missile (SLBM) capabilities, both because of the threat that these weapons themselves could pose and because of what their continued development could portend for North Korea’s ballistic missile capabilities as a whole.

North Korea’s SLBMs: A Short Rundown 

North Korea has to date unveiled five different variants of its Pukguksong series of SLBMs, some of which appear to have been adapted for use as land-based ballistic missiles. North Korea first conducted land-based static tests of its Pukguksong-1 SLBM in 2014 and has since carried out tests of the missile’s ejection system as well as five full flight tests. The first successful flight test of the Pukguksong-1 took place in April 2016, with a second successful test – in which the missile traveled a distance of 500 km – took place in August of that year, leading analysts to assess that the missile possessed a range of approximately 1,200 km.

In 2017, North Korea conducted two successful tests of the Pukguksong-2, a land-based variant of the Pukguksong-1. Based on assessments of the two tests, it is believed that the Pukguksong-2 has a range of somewhere between 1,200 and 2,000 km. Like its predecessor, the Pukguksong-2 utilizes a solid-fueled engine which, combined with its tracked transporter erector launcher (TEL), affords the Pukguksong-2 more flexibility than other North Korean missiles of similar ranges.

With the Pukguksong-3, the series returned to its sea-based roots. The development of the Pukguksong-3 followed continued advances in North Korea’s production of solid-fueled missile engines. The Pukguksong-3 was successfully tested in October 2019, with estimates of the missile’s range placed at 1,900 to 2,000 km.

Since the successful testing of the Pukgukgsong-3, North Korea has unveiled two new SLBM variants, both of which it has yet to test for the first time. The Pukguksong-4 was unveiled during the October 2020 military parade celebrating the 75th anniversary of the founding of the country’s ruling party, while the Pukguksong-5 was revealed during the parade associated with North Korea’s Eighth Party Congress in January.

Just How Dangerous? 

Given the lack of testing, analysts can only speculate about the performance specifics of both the two most recent additions to North Korea’s SLBM inventory. Based purely on visual assessments, analysts have suggested that the Pukguksong-5 may have a range of up to 3,000 km, allowing it to strike the island of Guam if fired from the center of the Sea of Japan. Analysts have also suggested that given the rough similarities between the Pukguksong-3, -4, and -5, North Korea may still be in the process of settling on a final design for the future of its SLBM arsenal.

North Korea currently operates only a single ballistic missile submarine, though it is also constructing a new vessel that may be capable of carrying up to three SLBMs.

Given the limitations of North Korea’s submarines, the most immediate threat posed by North Korean SLBMs is likely to come from their ability to circumvent ballistic missile defenses deployed on the Korean Peninsula. In addition, North Korea’s continued development of more advanced solid-fueled engines utilized by its SLBMs could lead to the production of solid-fueled intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs), which would represent a substantial increase in North Korea’s ability to threaten the continental United States.

Eli Fuhrman is a contributing writer for The National Interest.

Written By

Eli Fuhrman is an Assistant Researcher in Korean Studies at the Center for the National Interest and a recent graduate of Georgetown University’s Security Studies Program, where he focusedd on East Asian security issues and U.S. foreign and defense policy in the region.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *