Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Uncategorized

The Navy’s Columbia-class Submarine Will Break All of the Records

Columbia-class
An artist rendering of the future U.S. Navy Columbia-class ballistic missile submarines. The 12 submarines of the Columbia-class will replace the Ohio-class submarines which are reaching their maximum extended service life. It is planned that the construction of USS Columbia (SSBN-826) will begin in in fiscal year 2021, with delivery in fiscal year 2028, and being on patrol in 2031.

The Secretary of the Navy stressed that keeping Columbia-class program costs on target will be crucial to countering Chinese ambitions around the globe.

One Record-Breaking Sub

The United States Navy’s biggest modernization priority right now is the Columbia-class of nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines. The class will replace the Ohio-class nuclear submarines and take over the older submarines’ role as the United States underwater strategic deterrent. The first Columbia submarine is slated to enter service in 2027.

Like the previous Ohio-class, the Columbias will carry Trident II nuclear intercontinental ballistic missiles. However, the Columbia-class will feature several improvements over its predecessor.

One of the most significant boons to the class will be its nuclear reactor. Unlike most nuclear-powered submarines, the Columbia-class can forgo the lengthy and complicated nuclear fuel exchange process in the middle of its service life. Instead, the class will operate with the same nuclear fuel it shipped with until it retires, reducing maintenance time and expense and allowing the submarines to spend less time out of the water.

The Columbia-class is expensive — by some estimates, the program will be the most expensive project the United States Navy has ever undertaken. But costs are just one challenge, there is also what can easily be seen as requirements creep. 

Costs and Competitors

In comments given during an event hosted by The Southeastern New England Defense Industry Alliance, the United States Secretary of the Navy, Carlos Del Toro, stated in no uncertain terms that the U.S. Navy must withstand “requirements creep” when finalizing the Columbia-class design.

Keeping program costs low has proven to be a challenge in recent years. For example, the Navy’s Littoral Combat Ships, a two-class ship group of advanced modular ships, famously came to a screeching end after incredibly inflated program costs triggered a Congressionally mandated project halt.

In addition to keeping costs low, Navy Secretary Del Toro stressed that the Navy must also “not lose sight of China” and that a successful Columbia-class rollout would “prevent them [China] from taking over” in the naval domain. China is “committed to being a full-scale competitor” of the United States worldwide, Del Toro explained, emphasizing that is “why we have to accelerate our efforts in technology.”

Postscript

The People’s Liberation Army Navy has made significant advancements both quantitatively and qualitatively. In addition to sailing the world’s largest navy in terms of sheer hull numbers, domestically-built Chinese submarines are becoming increasingly sophisticated, posing a threat to previously unrivaled American supremacy at sea. Moreover, China’s expansion and modernization of its nuclear forces and recent advances in hypersonic missile technology pose a challenge as well.

Ohio-class Submarine

Image of Ohio-class Submarine: Image via Creative Commons.

Keeping a firm grip on the Columbia-class scope of purpose will be crucially important to project costs — and necessary if the U.S. Navy wants to counter an increasingly capable People’s Liberation Army Navy more effectively.

Caleb Larson is a Defense Writer based in Europe. He holds a Master of Public Policy and covers U.S. and Russian security, European defense issues, and German politics and culture.

Written By

Caleb Larson, a defense journalist based in Europe and holds a Master of Public Policy degree from the Willy Brandt School of Public Policy. He lives in Berlin and writes on U.S. and Russian foreign and defense policy, German politics and culture.

2 Comments

2 Comments

  1. Rexford L

    September 1, 2021 at 1:23 pm

    Next generation SSNs will also be hugely important, honestly more so than the Columbia SSBNs.

  2. FRAZIER STALL

    September 4, 2021 at 10:22 am

    China, which has no warships in the Atlantic, is viewed by US as a threat around the globe yet multiple recent world polls point to the US as the greatest threat to peace.

    The threat posed by more US ballistic nuclear missiles in the upcoming Columbia subs will lead to another bigger threat to peace – a gross miscalculation by unthinking US political & military leaders to use nuclear war to take down china in one fell swoop.

    China will surely retaliate against US vassals nearest her shores, especially Japan, where a hidden threat to humankind’s existence already exists – fukushima.

    A bullseye strike there will release a steady stream of radioactive isotopes into the atmosphere, killing all life in its path.

    Truly, the US is the biggest threat.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Advertisement