Despite myriad problems with the U.S. Navy’s Littoral Combat Ships (LCS), the People’s Liberation Army Navy thinks its a dangerous platform.
The People’s Liberation Army Navy, China’s maritime force, believes that the LCS could prove to be a persistent threat to China’s naval ambitions in the western Pacific. Moreover, some Chinese wonks think that those LCSs armed with anti-ship missiles specifically could upend PLAN calculus.
A group of Chinese defense researchers juxtaposed “the littoral combat ship (LCS) with other surface combatants, arguing that the former’s modularity, cheap price, high speed, and other characteristics enable it to become a powerful tool in future distributed lethality tactics” in a research paper from the Marine Design & Research Institute of China, an important R&D group for the Chinese shipbuilding industry titled The U.S. Navy’s Distributed Lethality Implementation Method. USNI News first reported on the paper.
Multiple Freedom-class ships sustained seawater ingress due to faulty engine gasket seals that damaged their engine internals. One Independence-class ship’s driveshaft
The Navy recently discovered that a faulty combining gear linking the Freedom-class’ two gas turbine engines with dual diesel engines. The design flaw is expected to affect virtually all Freedom-class ships besides those that have not yet been built and will require a delicate and costly retrofit thanks to the class’ complex engine design and difficult-to-reach placement within the ship’s hull.
More recently, the Navy has armed both Littoral Combat Ship classes with potent anti-ship missiles. Of particular note in Chinese eyes are the U.S. Navy’s Naval Strike Missile, a potent ship-killer with potentially wide application potential within the Navy beyond just the LCS, and an updated, extended-range variant of the Navy’s Harpoon anti-ship missile.
From Carrier Battle Groups to Decentralized Formations
Aside from simply reassessing the Littoral Combat Ship’s anti-ship capabilities, the researchers also examined trends in U.S. Navy strike group formations, from large carrier-centric battle groups to decentralized formations composed of smaller vessels but equipped with potent anti-ship capabilities and what effect this free redesign would have on Chinese naval ambitions in their near abroad.
The paper stated that the “miniaturization of USN formations is not simply a change in the composition of the formations. Rather, it is an effort to create fully balanced combat forces by integrating platform capabilities, to leverage widely distributed and dispersed combat operations to lower the probability of being detected by [enemy information, surveillance and reconnaissance systems], the paper explained.
Furthermore, “using large numbers of small formations can also create more combat possibilities, generating a full range of threats to the opponent and placing enormous pressure on the opponent’s ISR systems.”
Although the Littoral Combat Ships have been plagued with issues both mechanically and from a budgetary perspective, the Chinese view could lend credence to Navy brass that would like to see the LCS platforms stick around. Regardless, the U.S. Navy should be pleased with the Naval Strike Missile’s outside assessment and the updated, extended-range Harpoon anti-ship missile.
Caleb Larson is a Defense Writer based in Europe. He holds a Master of Public Policy and covers U.S. and Russian security, European defense issues, and German politics and culture.