Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?


AVS-36: The Worst Rifle Ever Made? You Decide

AVS-36. Image Credit: Creative Commons.

The AVS-36 – The Worst Rifle Ever? The AVS-36 was Soviet Russia’s attempt at a fully-automatic service rifle, and it was a total flop. Though the AVS-36 had a high magazine capacity and was relatively lightweight, it was also virtually uncontrollable during fully-automatic firing.

The History

One of the Soviet Union’s first select-fire rifles, the AVS-36, is relatively unknown. It was designed by the notable Soviet firearms designer, Sergei Gavrilovich Simonov. While some of Simonov’s weapon designs like the PTRS anti-tank rifle or the SKS carbine were moderately successful — the AVS-36 proved to be an unsatisfactory design.

The AVS-36 was accepted by the Soviet Army in the mid-1930s and made it into service with the Red Army just in time for the 1939-1940 Winter War with Finland. On paper, the rifle was revolutionary and had several features that should have made the rifle popular with Red Army soldiers, though the rifle was ultimately a flop.

Like the venerable Mosin-Nagant that preceded it, the AVS-36 was chambered in the large 7.62x54mmR rimmed cartridge. Rather than ejecting from the right side like most rifles, however, the AVS-36 ejected from the top. Unlike the Mosin-Nagant, the AVS-36 fed from relatively large 15-round magazines — offering triple the capacity of the bolt-action imperial rifle.

The Russian 7.62x54mmR cartridge was originally designed in 1891 and is still in service today in some country’s militaries in a limited capacity. The full-powered rifle cartridge can have a long maximum effective range, and the AVS-36 ladder sight was accordingly marked out to 1,500 meters. In practice, however, the rifle was inaccurate past 800 meters or so. Interestingly, the rifle’s bayonet could be attached to the rifle stock vertically to create a type of monopod, though this was probably of limited utility.

One of the AVS-36’s most distinct features is its large, bulbous muzzle brake. Despite its large size, it was not particularly effective at controlling muzzle rise, and recoil was quite stiff, as evidenced in this video. Like the United States would learn with their overpowered M14 in Vietnam, the AVS-36 was virtually uncontrollable during fully-automatic firing, making its theoretical role as a squad support weapon impractical. And like the M14, it would quickly be withdrawn from the Soviet Army after brief and disappointing service life.

Finland actually issued captured AVS-36s to their troops during the Winter War, though they experienced the same problems with the rifle that the Russian did: jam-prone and very difficult to control during automatic firing.


Ultimately the AVS-36’s shortcomings necessitated a replacement and the rifle was withdrawn from service after only about 35,000-65,000 rifles had been manufactured. One of its successors, the SVT-40, though visually similar and chambered in the same 7.62x54mmR round would be much more successful, despite severely hampered production as a result of the Nazi invasion of the Soviet Union.

Caleb Larson is a defense writer based in Europe. He holds a Master of Public Policy and covers U.S. and Russian security, European defense issues, and German politics and culture.

Written By

Caleb Larson, a defense journalist based in Europe and holds a Master of Public Policy degree from the Willy Brandt School of Public Policy. He lives in Berlin and writes on U.S. and Russian foreign and defense policy, German politics and culture.

1 Comment

1 Comment

  1. Thomas Hawk

    November 30, 2021 at 4:23 pm

    The Canadian Ross rifle of WW1 was far worse than this. It was a bolt-action rifle that was prone to jamming. At least the AVS-36 had an auto mode instead of just being a single-shot bolt-action design.

    The Ross rifle was useful as a sniper rifle because it didn’t see heavy use and was serviced frequently. However, as a main battle rifle, it was more useful for its bayonet than its firing mechanism.

    If WW1 hadn’t been dominated by trench warfare, the Triple Entente would have been at a serious disadvantage because of this rifle. Both Canada and the UK used this rifle extensively despite being terrible. If this rifle had been introduced in France during the time of Napoleon, the man who came up with it would probably have lost his head for demonstrating such incompetence.

    Fortunately for the Entente forces, the quality of a rifle wasn’t very impactful in the trench warfare of WW1 that was dominated by full-auto machine guns and high explosive nitro-glycerin. The few field battles that did take place usually devolved into hand-to-hand spear fighting with bayonets, something that even the Ross rifle could do.

    The Ross rifle was a very early rifle design but not early enough to excuse its terrible design and implementation. Therefore, I say that the AVS-36 was NOT the worst rifle ever made.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *