Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?


SR-71 Blackbird: This Mach 3 Spy Plane Could Have Been a Bomber

SR-71 Blackbird Spy Plane. Image Credit: Creative Commons.

The SR-71 Blackbird was never hit or damaged by enemy fire. It eluded an estimated 4,000 surface-to-air missiles during its service life.

With this track record, why didn’t the Americans have it drop a bomb or two when blasting across the sky? This conversion would have been expensive, difficult, and maybe not even aerodynamically possible. But let’s dig deeper into why the SR-71 Blackbird never became a bomber.

Initial Plans for an SR-71 Bomber?

At first, it appeared that the SR-71 program would add a bomber to the fleet. The project was initially called the B-71 to denote it as a fighter/bomber/reconnaissance airplane based on the Lockheed A-12 Oxcart. According to the National Museum of the Air Force, “the fighter version became the YF-12A, but the bomber version never materialized.”

High-Flying SR-71 Meant High Prices

The “SR” stands for Strategic Reconnaissance and that was the main mission. It was a record-setter in speed – flying MACH 3.2, and in altitude – hitting a ceiling of 85,000 feet. But it was expensive to fly – at an estimated $200,000 per hour. In 1989, Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Larry D. Welch told Congress that the “Secretary of the Air Force estimated that the money used to operate the SR-71 fleet could operate and maintain two tactical fighter wings.”

SR-71: Fuel Was the Issue

Some of this cost was because of the high amount of fuel and the need for in-air refueling for any given mission. Carrying bombs would have meant the Blackbird could carry less fuel and this would likely necessitate another aerial re-fueling – adding to the cost of operation.

Could It Carry Bombs in Numbers?

Where or how would the bombs be carried? Private and commercial pilot Joe Shelton looked at this question closely on a post he wrote for Quora.

“The SR-71’s fuselage had very little room for internal ordnance. Almost all of it was used for fuel. If it were attached under the wings then our MACH 3 aircraft would probably be a MACH 2 aircraft or less. Maybe much less, depending, and that means a much lower cruise altitude. Of course, it would have given up some fuel capacity for ordnance. Lower and slower would have robbed the aircraft of its famed invulnerability intercepting aircraft or anti-aircraft missiles,” Shelton wrote.

Dumb Bombs Would Have Been Inaccurate

How accurate would a bomb dropped by an SR-71 be? It would not have been a precision-guided munition in the early days of the Blackbird’s life. A “dumb” bomb dropped from that high of an altitude would have likely missed its target.

Internal Storage of Ordnance

The SR-71 would have had to carry numerous bombs to try and hit targets and the airplane did not lend itself to carrying a heavy load of ordnance. The bombs would also have to be carried inside the airplane as Shelton explained.

“Since in order to maintain the supersonic cruise speed the ordnance would have to be carried internally, there is some question regarding deploying the ordnance without slowing the aircraft first to open the bomb bay doors or effect a safe ordnance release,” Shelton wrote.

Sorry, No SR-71 Bomber

Making the SR-71 into a bomber was thus a bridge too far. The bomber would have been more expensive to maintain. It would have needed to have been re-fueled more. The bombs would not have been accurate until precision-guided munitions were developed. And the ordnance would have needed to be carried internally to maintain the high speed and altitude. So, no bombs for the SR-71.

SR-71 Photo Essay

SR-71 Blackbird

SR-71. SR-71 photo taken at the National Air and Space Museum. Taken by 19FortyFive on 10/1/2022.




SR-71 photo taken at the National Air and Space Museum. Taken by 19FortyFive on 10/1/2022.

SR-71 Blackbird 19FortyFive

SR-71 Blackbird 19FortyFive Original Image. Taken 10/1/2022.

SR-71 Blackbird

SR-71 Blackbird, Udvar-Hazy Center | National Air and Space Museum. October 1, 2022. 19FortyFive Original Image.

Now serving as 1945’s Defense and National Security Editor, Brent M. Eastwood, Ph.D., is the author of Humans, Machines, and Data: Future Trends in Warfare. He is an Emerging Threats expert and former U.S. Army Infantry officer. You can follow him on Twitter @BMEastwood.

Written By

Now serving as 1945s New Defense and National Security Editor, Brent M. Eastwood, PhD, is the author of Humans, Machines, and Data: Future Trends in Warfare. He is an Emerging Threats expert and former U.S. Army Infantry officer.

1 Comment

1 Comment

  1. xheavy

    December 7, 2022 at 9:48 am

    You could not lift a useful payload that fast and high long and far enough to use it.

    Now that hypersonics are their own really fast attack vehicles it makes the Blackbird look like a dinosaur.

    With that said, the Blackbird was the plane for it’s time. It has the balls to out run anything any Nation on earth could shoot at it. Its been in combat you could say so much over the years.

    There are stories of BB pilots taking the plane beyond design limitations when necessary briefly.

    A bomber it aint never. Hitler made that mistake with the first Jet Plane. Loaded it down as a bomber. Made easy pluckings by Allied Fighters.

    I suppose you could put in the fuel, additional engines and increase the wing area to where it will carry 10,000 nuclear pounds at 70,000 feet far enough to hurt Soviet Union somewhere. But it would be so big it will require miles of runway to get upstairs and then need a tank of gas to go anywhere.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *