Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Smart Bombs: Military, Defense and National Security

The U.S. Navy’s DDG(X) Destroyer: Armed with Lasers and Hypersonic Missiles

Arleigh Burke-class
ATLANTIC OCEAN (June 12, 2021) The Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Paul Ignatius (DDG 117) transits the Atlantic Ocean, June 12, 2021. Paul Ignatius is operating in the Atlantic Ocean in support of U.S. 6th Fleet’s full spectrum of joint and naval operations, often in concert with allied, joint, and interagency, partners, in order to advance U.S. national interests and security and stability in Europe and Africa. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Nathan T. Beard) 210612-N-QI061-1430

The U.S. Navy just announced what it envisions for the weapons systems that will be on the Next-Generation Guided-Missile Destroyer. The future ship-building program, known as DDG(X), will have plenty of newfangled goodies for offensive and defensive operations to bring the navy toward its future warfare objectives. The DDG(X) will carry everything from lasers to hypersonic weapons.

(Subscribe to Our YouTube Channel Here. 19FortyFive publishes original videos every day.)

Replacing Older Ships By 2030

The DDG(X) is meant to replace the Arleigh Burke-class DDG-51 destroyer and the Ticonderoga (CG-47) class Aegis cruisers. The Navy aims to build the DDG(X) in tune with new technological developments for its weapons systems. It is hoped that DDG(X) will be proliferating in the 2030s with the first ship purchased in 2030.

Navy Brass Is Enthused

Rear Admiral Fred Pyle, the Navy’s director of surface warfare, spoke at a conference in Arlington, Virginia on January 11. “It’s going to bring us the opportunity to use larger missile launchers. It’s going to bring us the opportunity to use more higher power lasers and long-range strike hypersonic weapons — as well as sensor growth — as we go into the future,” Pyle said, according to National Defense magazine.

Powerful Radar Will Improve during the Development of DDG(X)

DDG(X) will work with Raytheon for the deployment of the high-powered SPY-6 radar that should be even better in the coming decades. SPY-6 can protect a ship against incoming ballistic and cruise missiles. It can also track enemy ships and airplanes – all simultaneously.

The New Ship Will Depend on Lasers for Defense and Offense

Then there is work to be done with Lockheed Martin for directed energy weapons. The main system will be HELIOS or High-energy Lasers with Integrated Optical-dazzler and Surveillance. HELIOS is a 60+ kW-class high energy laser that is already going on certain naval ships. It should improve as the years go by and become fully mature when DDG(X) is ready. The great thing about lasers like HELIOS is that they have a low cost per kill compared to expensive anti-aircraft interceptors. HELIOS is another layer of defense for the navy.

Don’t Forget Conventional Air Defenses

DDG(X) will still have conventional air defense interceptor missiles such as the Standard Missile-6 (SM-6). SM-6 can be used against enemy missiles, airplanes, and ships. Adversarial drones are also threats that SM-6 can blast out of the sky. SM-6 will have software that can be upgraded efficiently.

DDG(X) Boasts Hypersonics Too

Next for DDG(X) is its compatibility with hypersonic weapons. The preferred choice is the Conventional Prompt Strike (CPS) hypersonic that flies over MACH 5 and is maneuverable in flight. Conventional Prompt Strike depends on a boost-glide vehicle. CPS has a two‑stage solid rocket motor booster that carries a kinetic-energy projectile warhead. It should be ready by 2028 and be integrated into DDG(X).

Across the Board Improvements

DDG(X) ships will likely displace 13,500 tons which is 39 percent larger than the Arleigh Burke-class. It will also have the ability to carry more weight and generate the electrical power necessary to operate the lasers and other combat systems. DDG(X) will be quieter with a reduced infrared and electro-magnetic signature. DDG(X) will also have a longer cruising range than existing cruisers and destroyers.

Steady Funding Stream Will Help DDG(X) Meets Its Goals

The navy requested $195.5 million for research and development in FY23. While the precise design of the ship is being determined – hence the ‘X’ moniker – all systems are a go for the program to meet its milestones and continue without schedule or budget slips. It will need manufacturing efficiencies and cost-cutting measures because the price of each hull could be as much as $3.4 billion.

The navy needs new more advanced ships with modern sensors and weapon systems such as lasers and hypersonics. If it can build out the DDG(X) program, these new ships will have the combat capability and survivability that will be the envy of the fleet and ability to challenge adversaries in far-flung areas of operations.

MORE: Is Donald Trump a ‘Cognitive Mess’? 

MORE: Should Joe Biden Really Run in 2024? 

MORE: Ron DeSantis May Peak Too Early

Author Expertise and Experience: Serving as 19FortyFive’s Defense and National Security Editor, Dr. Brent M. Eastwood is the author of Humans, Machines, and Data: Future Trends in Warfare. He is an Emerging Threats expert and former U.S. Army Infantry officer. You can follow him on Twitter @BMEastwood. He holds a Ph.D. in Political Science and Foreign Policy/ International Relations.

Written By

Now serving as 1945s New Defense and National Security Editor, Brent M. Eastwood, PhD, is the author of Humans, Machines, and Data: Future Trends in Warfare. He is an Emerging Threats expert and former U.S. Army Infantry officer.



  1. mcswell

    January 13, 2023 at 2:58 pm

    Over 13,000 tons?! The DDG I served on in the early 70s was about 4000 tons, and earlier DDs were in the neighborhood of a couple thousand tons. These destroyers are like dinosaurs, evolving bigger and bigger. I just hope they aren’t like dinosaurs in getting wiped out by impacts–those laser weapons sound good, but if you send a ballistic missile their way, or a flock of hundreds or thousands of drones, will they survive?

  2. stephen campanella

    January 14, 2023 at 9:19 am

    The story of the Yorktown should be a lesson to current Naval planners.

    1. It was planned, built and ready to go in 1941 before the outbreak.

    2. It was state of the art, but was manned by a large, qualified crew.

    3. When disabled at Coral Sea, it returned to battle within a month,

    and significantly aided to the victory at Midway.

    Should a new war come, will our forces be survivable and or replaceable? The enemy will almost certainly strike first, as they did in Korea. We will not have the luxury of months to replace those weapons destroyed in an initial attack, as we did after Pearl Harbor.

    So what is the answer? There is no one answer, but it seems that powerful offensive weapons alone cannot be the way to go. If one goes beyond the tanks and aircraft the Allies produced during the Second War, it really comes down to Intelligence gathering. The Atlantic couldn’t have been won without Enigma. The code breaking before Midway, the information supplied to the Soviets before Kursk. These were the critical battles that turned the tide of the war, and the victories were the result of better information gathering, not the number and quality of the weapons, or the bravery of the soldiers and sailors.

    If two or three powerful men are waiting around a corner with guns to attack you, it won’t matter as long as you find out when and where. Then bring an automatic rifle with you. The surprise is yours, and they are gone.

  3. Gregory W Edwards

    January 14, 2023 at 7:06 pm

    This is fantastic new technology. I wonder if these lasers could be deployed on both U.S. coasts to shoot down incoming enemy nuclear warheads. Imagine a world where the threat of nuclear Armagedón does not exist. We need a defensive system to shield us from attacks NOW!!!.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *