Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Uncategorized

USS America: The Navy Tried (And Failed) To Sink Their Own Aircraft Carrier

USS America
USS America sinking.

The death of USS America: In what was likely horrifying to sailors and onlookers who did not know the full story, the USS America (CV-66) aircraft carrier once actually sunk. It wasn’t from enemy fire or torpedoes; it was a test to see how such a large ship could withstand an attack from adversaries. The sinking happened in 2005 and the ship slipped 17,000 feet below onto the floor of the Atlantic Ocean after weeks of explosions. This was an intentional scuttling in an effort to collect data on how a carrier can take a punch.

USS America: Why Sink Our Own Carrier?

The America is the only super carrier to have ever sunk – due to enemy action – or due to premeditated efforts. The America had been decommissioned since 1996 due to post-Cold War budget constraints. The Navy needed information on how to proceed with building future carriers. Evaluators wanted to determine the strengths and weaknesses of a large ship during combat. Testing a planned sinking could provide lessons learned for the newer nuclear-powered Nimitz-class carriers.

Excellent War Record

The conventionally-powered America served for 31 gallant years during Vietnam and Operation Desert Storm, and other conflicts. While fighting in Vietnam, the ship could carry 79 aircraft such as the F-4 Phantom, the A-6 Intruder, and the A-7 Corsair II. The America served three tours off the coast of Vietnam running sorties around the clock. During the Reagan administration, the America spent time in the Mediterranean supporting the conflict in Libya by eliminating Libyan air defense systems and ships. In the First Gulf War, the USS America delivered 3,000 sorties. It ended a sterling service record by enforcing no-fly zones over Iraq and supporting operations in Bosnia.

It wasn’t going to be easy to intentionally scuttle such an historic ship in what was called a SINKEX operation. The War Zone noted how the Navy pressed on with its idea to force the sinking of the America.

Sink USS America: Are We Sure We Want to Do This?

1945’s Harrison Kass uncovered this telling quote from Vice Chief of Naval Operations Admiral John Nathman. The admiral said in 2005, “USS America will make one final and vital contribution to our national defense, this time as a live-fire test and evaluation platform. America’s legacy will serve as a footprint in the design of future carriers—ships that will protect the sons, daughters, grandchildren and great-grandchildren of American veterans. We will conduct a variety of comprehensive tests above and below the waterline collecting data for use by naval architects and engineers in creating the nation’s future carrier fleet. It is essential we make those ships as highly survivable as possible.”

This Was Uncharted Territory   

This SINKEX was a different type of mission. The Navy didn’t really know what to expect or how much punishment the carrier could endure. The ship was towed 300 hundred miles off the Virginia coast and then the controlled explosions started. Blasts continually hit the carrier in a process that took four weeks. Aircraft carriers have many berths and compartments, so it took a long time for the water to penetrate the ship.

Is that Testing Relevant Today?

What does that mean for today’s carriers? China has carrier-killing missiles that could challenge the Navy’s dominant flat-tops. But their warheads would likely not create the type of explosions that would immediately sink such a large vessel. This would give the navy time to react, conduct damage assessment and repairs, and hopefully move the ship out of harm’s way and transfer sailors to another ship.

But a sinking of a carrier does strike fear into the hearts of many sailors and Navy brass. New supercarriers such as the Gerald R. Ford undergo shock trials to simulate combat strikes on the ships. Let’s hope the Ford can survive any missile hits against it and that no other carrier is ever scuttled at the hands of the U.S. Navy.

Bonus: Nimitz-Class Aircraft Carrier Photo Essay

USS Gerald R. Ford

The Ford-class aircraft carrier USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN 78) and the Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS Harry S. Truman (CVN 75) transit the Atlantic Ocean June 4, 2020, marking the first time a Ford-class and a Nimitz-class aircraft carrier operated together underway. Ford is underway conducting integrated air wing operations, and the Harry S. Truman Carrier Strike Group remains at sea in the Atlantic as a certified carrier strike group force ready for tasking in order to protect the crew from the risks posed by COVID-19, following their successful deployment to the U.S. 5th and 6th Fleet areas of operation. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist Seaman Riley McDowell)

Nimitz-class Aircraft Carrier

(Feb. 5, 2021) An F/A-18E Super Hornet, from the “Kestrels” of Strike Fighter Squadron (VFA) 137, rests on the flight deck of the aircraft carrier USS Nimitz (CVN 68) during a strait transit. Nimitz is part of the Nimitz Carrier Strike Group and is deployed conducting maritime security operations and theater security cooperation efforts. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class Elliot Schaudt/Released)

South China Sea

NORFOLK (Aug. 16, 2019) The Nimitz-class aircraft carriers USS Dwight D. Eisenhower (CVN 69), left, and USS John C. Stennis (CVN 74) moored at Naval station Norfolk. Making port at Naval station Norfolk is a routine activity for aircraft carriers.

Aircraft Carrier

(Oct. 17, 2021) Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS Carl Vinson (CVN 70) transits the Bay of Bengal as part of Maritime Partnership Exercise (MPX), Oct. 16, 2021. MPX 2021 is a multilateral maritime exercise between the Royal Australian Navy, Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force, U.K. Royal Navy, and U.S. maritime forces, focused on naval cooperation, interoperability and regional security and stability in the Indo-Pacific and is an example of the enduring partnership between Australian, Japanese, U.K. and U.S. maritime forces, who routinely operate together in the Indo-Pacific, fostering a cooperative approach toward regional security and stability. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Russell Lindsey)

MORE: World War III – Where Could It Start?

MORE: A U.S.-China War Over Taiwan Would Be Bloody

Expert Biography: Serving as 1945’s Defense and National Security Editor, Dr. Brent M. Eastwood is the author of Humans, Machines, and Data: Future Trends in Warfare. He is an Emerging Threats expert and former U.S. Army Infantry officer. You can follow him on Twitter @BMEastwood. He holds a Ph.D. in Political Science and Foreign Policy/ International Relations.

Written By

Now serving as 1945s New Defense and National Security Editor, Brent M. Eastwood, PhD, is the author of Humans, Machines, and Data: Future Trends in Warfare. He is an Emerging Threats expert and former U.S. Army Infantry officer.

Advertisement