Article Summary: Russia is reviving its Cold War-era Kirov-class battlecruisers, equipping them with S-300 air-defense systems in an effort to enhance its naval capabilities, something many media outlets have missed. These massive warships could bolster Russia’s blue-water fleet and provide limited ballistic missile defense, but their strategic value remains questionable.
Key Point #1 – While an S-300-equipped Kirov in the Black Sea could theoretically threaten Ukraine, Ukrainian missiles and drone boats have made Russian surface ships highly vulnerable. Compared to the U.S. Navy’s advanced Aegis Combat System, Russia’s naval air-defense capabilities remain limited.
Key Point #2 – The return of the Kirov-class may signal ambition, but its effectiveness in modern warfare is uncertain.
Russia Revives Kirov-Class Battlecruisers: A New Threat on the Seas?
Russia is working to return its Kirov-class battlecruisers to full service, equipped with S-300 air-defense systems. The battlecruisers are undergoing repairs as Russia looks to deploy them anew for ballistic-missile defense and at-sea fire-support operations.
The Soviet-era Kirov class is a large-deck, heavily armed guided-missile cruiser with guns, rockets, torpedoes, and missiles. Perhaps of greatest tactical significance, the cruisers carry S-300 air defense systems.
The ships are very large – only the biggest capital vessels, such as aircraft carriers, are bigger than these cruisers – and the well-known S-300 air defense system makes them distinctive.
The S-300F maritime variant is a ship-based version of the S-300P land-fired system, and its integration into a battlecruiser gives the Russian Navy an air- and ballistic-missile defense capability it otherwise lacks.
Russia’s ongoing efforts to resurrect the Kirov may indicate a broader interest in returning air-defense capabilities to sea. Russia lacks this capability, which the U.S. Navy has thanks to its Aegis system.
A Sputnik news report from several years ago claimed the S-300s attached to a Kirov-class vessel could track multiple targets at altitudes of 30 kilometers out to ranges of 300 km.
“Pyotr Veliky is armed with 48 S-300F Fort and 46 S-300FM Fort-M (SA-N-20 Gargoyle) medium-range surface-to-air missiles (with effective range of up to 200 kilometers), 128 3K95 Kinzhal (SA-N-9 Gauntlet) short-range SAMs, and six CADS-N-1 Kashtan gun/missile systems,” Sputnik explained.
S-300 vs. Ukraine
The possible return of the Kirov-class raises significant tactical questions regarding both the war in Ukraine, and the potential for “blue-water” naval air-defense systems. An S-300-armed Kirov in the Black Sea might be in position to attack Ukrainian coastal areas with deck-mounted guns. But Ukrainian land-fired antiship missiles and drone boats have already essentially cleared the Black Sea coasts of any threatening Russian naval presence. Should the Kirov seek to operate in the Black Sea to add suppressive coastal fire, the ship would likely be far too vulnerable to Ukrainian missiles – it would be destroyed quickly.
The presence of S-300s in the Black Sea would similarly seem to have little tactical relevance, since ground-based air defenses already deny access to certain Russian areas from the air, and neither side has established air superiority.
Kirov-Class vs US Navy
One important effect of a Kirov-class return might relate to open, blue-water maritime warfare. The presence of S-300s could imperil U.S. Navy aircraft from the ocean surface.
While the ships are large targets, and therefore potentially vulnerable to surface and undersea attack, the Kirov-class could be well positioned to add large-volume fires and air defenses in a lower-threat environment.
The most significant operative question, however, pertains to the ship-integrated S-300’s ability to perform counter-air and ballistic-missile-defense missions.
This ability would depend on the condition of any integrated S-300 systems, and the extent to which they have been modernized.
U.S. Navy Aegis Combat Systems Baseline 9 and 10, for example, are capable of integrating air- and cruise-missile defense and ballistic-missile protections into a single radar and fire-control solution. Its SM-3 Block II interceptor missiles, for example, have shown an ability to intercept intercontinental ballistic missiles in space approaching the boundary of the earth’s atmosphere.
The Russian Kirov-class cruisers are not likely to operate with a comparable ability but may add a maritime-based counter-aircraft node Russia otherwise lacks.’
Kirov-Class: A Photo Essay
Kirov-Class Battlecruiser Russian Navy. Image Credit: Creative Commons.
Kirov-Class battlecruiser. Image Credit: Creative Commons.
Kirov-Class Battlecruiser. Image Credit: Russian Navy.
Kirov-Class. Image Credit: Creative Commons.
Aerial starboard quarter view of the Soviet Kirov-class guided missile destroyer FRUNZE underway back in 1985.
A port view of the Soviet nuclear-powered guided missile cruiser KIROV at anchor. In the background is a Soviet Krivak I-class guided missile frigate.
A starboard bow view of the Soviet Kirov class nuclear-powered guided missile cruiser KALININ.
About the Author: Kris Osborn
Kris Osborn is the Military Technology Editor of 19FortyFive and President of Warrior Maven – Center for Military Modernization. Osborn previously served at the Pentagon as a highly qualified expert in the Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army—Acquisition, Logistics & Technology. Osborn has also worked as an anchor and on-air military specialist at national TV networks. He has appeared as a guest military expert on Fox News, MSNBC, The Military Channel, and The History Channel. He also has a Masters Degree in Comparative Literature from Columbia University
