Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Smart Bombs: Military, Defense and National Security

The F-14 Tomcat Fighter Summed Up in 4 Words

F-14 Banana Pass. Image Credit: Creative Commons.
F-14 Banana Pass. Image Credit: Creative Commons.

Article Summary: The F-14 Tomcat, one of the most iconic U.S. Navy fighter jets, was built for air superiority and fleet defense. Featuring variable-sweep wings, AIM-54 Phoenix missiles, and advanced radar, it excelled at intercepting Soviet bombers. However, by the 2000s, rising maintenance costs, aging avionics, and the need for digital warfare capabilities made it obsolete.

Key Point #1 – The F/A-18 Super Hornet replaced the Tomcat, offering better range, avionics, and multirole capabilities.

Key Point #2 – While the F-14 remains a fan favorite, modern naval aviation demanded more versatile and cost-effective aircraft, sealing its fate.

Those 4 Words: Father Time Always Wins 

F-14 Tomcat: Why This Legendary Fighter Jet Was Retired

The Grumman F-14 Tomcat, introduced into United States Navy service in the early 1970s, was a not-insignificant advancement over its predecessor carrier aircraft, the F-4 Phantom II, built by McDonnell Douglas.

The F-14 — designed specifically from the outset as a carrier-based air superiority fighter — addressed several glaring limitations of the F-4 and offered the U.S. Navy overall better capabilities.

The shift reflected changes in naval aviation that the F-4 had a hard time adjusting to, in particular, longer stand-off ranges and a battle space that was increasingly digital.

From Good to Great: Advancements Over the F-4 Phantom II

One of the major improvements the F-14 brought to the table was its (for the time) fairly advanced weapons system.

Thanks to the AN/AWG-9 radar, the F-14 could find and track a number of targets at quite far distances, which offered a great expansion to the F-14 Phantom’s capabilities. 

One of the most obvious benefits of this was the F-14’s capability to fire the AIM-54 Phoenix missile at targets very far — it could target enemy aircraft at aircraft in excess of 90 miles away.

By comparison, the F-4 could engage aircraft with AIM-7 Sparrow and AIM-9 Sidewinder missiles with lacked the range of the Phoenix.

The F-4’s variable-sweep wings also offered more flexibility across a range of flight speeds and therefore better aerodynamics, in turn improving maneuverability and handling over a range of speeds, including landing and take-off as well as high-speed interception.

Carrier Battle Group Defender

From the outset, the F-14 was designed to play a significant role in protecting Carrier Battle Groups — essentially an array of surface vessels centered on protecting an aircraft carrier and projection power far across the globe — from anti-ship missile threats posed to the Carrier Battle Groups by Soviet anti-ship missiles launched from submarines, bombers or strike aircraft, or from other surface ships.

Enter the F/A-18 Hornet — and Later, the Super Hornet

Compared to other contemporary aircraft of the era, the F-14 was an excellent navialized air superiority and fleet defense fighter.

But, when the U.S. Navy brought the F/A-18 Hornet, built by McDonnell Douglas, in the 1980s, into service, it became clear that an emphasis on less specialized, but nonetheless capable — and indeed, logistically less complex — aircraft was needed.

To that end, the F/A-18 Hornet combined attack and fighter mission profiles and gave the U.S. Navy good versatility, complementing the capabilities of the F-14.

In this tandem deployment setup, the F-14 and F/A-18 Hornet operated together, with the newer F/A-18 able to prosecute a broader range of targets, including land-based targets.

The eventual development of the follow-on F/A-18E/F Super Hornet was one of the last nails in the F-14 coffin.

The Super Hornet gave the U.S. Navy better range, better avionics, and a reduced radar cross-section compared to the older Hornet, and gave the Navy better overall flexibility.

F-14 Tomcat Retirement

One of the factors that ultimately resulted in the F-14’s retirement in 2006 was the Tomcat’s high maintenance requirements. Aging avionics, combined with the upkeep of its variable-sweep wing design, meant a modernized aircraft would hold a distinct edge over the F-14.

Progress in naval aviation technology also played a role. More modern naval warfare necessitated network-centric operations and an increasingly high amount of computing power.

For an aircraft initially designed decades before the wide integration of digital technologies and with limited processing power, the F-14 offered limited future growth potential.

With the introduction of the F/A-18 Super Hornet, improved avionics and data link abilities between aircraft and surface vessels in almost real-time heralded a new age in naval aviation.

F-14 Tomcat: A Story in Photos 

F-14 Tomcat Fighters

F-14 Tomcat Fighters. Image Credit: Creative Commons.

F-14 Tomcat

F-14 Tomcat

F-14 Tomcat

Naval Air Station Oceana, Va. (Sept. 25, 2004) – An F-14D Tomcat assigned to the “Black Lions” of Fighter Squadron Two One Three (VF-213), conducts a high-speed pass at the conclusion of the tactical air power demonstration at the 2004 “In Pursuit of Liberty,” Naval Air Station Oceana Air Show. The demonstration showcased multiple F-14 Tomcats and F/A-18 Hornets displaying various maneuvers and simulated bomb and staffing passes in front of the crowd. The air show, held Sept. 24-26, showcased civilian and military aircraft from the Nation’s armed forces, which provided many flight demonstrations and static displays. U.S. Navy photo by Photographer’s Mate 2nd Class Daniel J. McLain (RELEASED).

F-14 Tomcat. Image taken at National Air and Space Museum on October 1, 2022. Image by 19FortyFive.

F-14 Tomcat. Image taken at National Air and Space Museum on October 1, 2022. Image by 19FortyFive.

F-14

F-14 Tomcat. Image taken at National Air and Space Museum on October 1, 2022. Image by 19FortyFive.

About the Author: Caleb Larson 

Caleb Larson is an American multiformat journalist based in Berlin, Germany. His work covers the intersection of conflict and society, focusing on American foreign policy and European security. He has reported from Germany, Russia, and the United States. Most recently, he covered the war in Ukraine, reporting extensively on the war’s shifting battle lines from Donbas and writing on the war’s civilian and humanitarian toll. Previously, he worked as a Defense Reporter for POLITICO Europe. You can follow his latest work on X.

Written By

Caleb Larson is an American multiformat journalist based in Berlin, Germany. His work covers the intersection of conflict and society, focusing on American foreign policy and European security. He has reported from Germany, Russia, and the United States. Most recently, he covered the war in Ukraine, reporting extensively on the war’s shifting battle lines from Donbas and writing on the war's civilian and humanitarian toll. Previously, he worked as a Defense Reporter for POLITICO Europe.

Advertisement