Article Summary: Russia’s naval power has fluctuated throughout history, from the Soviet Union’s formidable blue-water navy to post-Cold War decline. The Ukraine war further exposed vulnerabilities, with the sinking of the Moskva highlighting strategic weaknesses.
Key Point #1 – Despite economic constraints and Western sanctions, Russia remains determined to restore its maritime strength, focusing on submarines, cruise missiles, and Arctic dominance. The Northern Fleet remains a key nuclear deterrent, while efforts to rebuild the Black Sea and Pacific Fleets continue.
Key Point #2 – Whether Moscow can reclaim global naval influence is uncertain, but its ambitions are clear—Russia sees its navy as central to its great power status.
The Future of Russia’s Navy: Strengths, Weaknesses, and Ambitions
Ever since imperial times, Russia has sought to build and deploy a powerful navy—not merely as a projection of prestige but as a strategic necessity.
This ambition has always gone beyond mere symbolism. From Peter the Great’s relentless push to establish the Baltic Fleet—a calculated move to break Russia’s historical isolation from European power centers—to the Soviet Union’s global deployment of a formidable blue-water navy stretching from Cuba to Vietnam, maritime strength has been at the heart of Russia’s pursuit of great power status.
For a nation hemmed in by ice-bound northern ports and locked seas, naval strength was more than just a military tool; it was the key to transcending geographical limitations. The Soviet Navy, at its zenith, stood as a credible rival to the U.S. Navy, fielding iconic vessels such as Typhoon-class submarines and Kirov-class battlecruisers. These ships weren’t merely instruments of warfare—they were declarations of Moscow’s intent to stand shoulder to shoulder with the world’s leading powers.
The Russian Navy’s Interesting History: Up and Down and All Over
But Russia’s naval trajectory has never been linear or secure. The collapse of the Soviet Union shattered this vision, plunging Moscow into an era of strategic confusion and chronic underfunding that hollowed out its naval capabilities.
Once-proud fleets became rusting hulks at anchor. The ability to defend the Baltic and Black Sea coastlines deteriorated rapidly. What had been a global naval presence, capable of projecting power on multiple fronts, shrank almost overnight.
This wasn’t just a military setback; it was a deep wound to Russia’s standing in the world. The Russian Navy had served as the most visible symbol of Soviet power abroad. Its decline was a painful admission: Russia had fallen from its superpower perch.
Yet Moscow has never truly accepted this diminished role. Under Vladimir Putin, there’s no doubt that the Kremlin still dreams of reversing this decline and reasserting its maritime influence.
The Ukraine War
The war in Ukraine has only deepened these challenges. The sinking of the Moskva—the flagship of the Black Sea Fleet—wasn’t simply a tactical loss. It was a humiliating blow that exposed fundamental weaknesses in Russia’s naval strategy and operational readiness. The Moskva wasn’t supposed to be vulnerable.
Its destruction was a stark reminder that the Russian Navy remains riddled with shortcomings. Similarly, operations at Snake Island, intended as a show of maritime dominance, instead revealed disorganization and tactical missteps. Even more devastating, the loss of Ukrainian shipyards like Mykolaiv—a cornerstone for constructing large naval vessels—crippled Moscow’s ability to sustain and modernize its fleet.
These failures raise a fundamental question: Can the Russian Navy recover? Can it rebuild the operational capabilities needed to establish a credible presence in strategic theaters like the Arctic, North Atlantic, and Pacific? Russia’s ambitions remain undiminished. The stakes are high, and the implications stretch far beyond its borders.
The Challenge of Geography for Russia and Naval Affairs
Geography has always dictated Russia’s naval strategy. With limited access to warm-water ports, Russia’s maritime ambitions have repeatedly clashed with the realities of its coastline. Sevastopol, on the Crimean Peninsula, holds enduring significance because it provides year-round access to the Black Sea and, through the Turkish Straits, the Mediterranean.
This obsession with warm-water access has driven Russian geopolitics for centuries, sparking conflicts from the Crimean War to the annexation of Crimea in 2014.
Shtorm Russian Navy Aircraft Carrier. Image Credit: Russian Social Media.
Russia’s Project 23000 Aircraft Carrier. Image Credit: Russian Government.
During the Cold War, the Soviet Navy expanded this reach, securing basing rights in Tartus, Syria, and maintaining a persistent naval presence in distant waters. Yet the collapse of the USSR swept much of this infrastructure away.
The Admiral Kuznetsov—Russia’s only aircraft carrier—now serves as a symbol of this decline: a ship dogged by breakdowns, fires, and costly repairs, emblematic of a navy struggling to reclaim its former glory.
Where Does the Navy Stand?
Despite these setbacks, Russia still holds critical assets. The Northern Fleet, based in Murmansk, remains the crown jewel of its naval forces. The Arctic region’s growing strategic importance—thanks to climate change opening new shipping routes—gives Moscow a unique opportunity.
The Northern Fleet houses Russia’s nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines (SSBNs), the bedrock of its sea-based nuclear deterrent. This fleet remains capable, and its under-ice patrols demonstrate Russia’s ability to operate in environments where Western navies have limited experience.
The Pacific Fleet, long overshadowed but historically significant during the Cold War, is also gaining relevance as Russia looks eastward, recognizing the Asia-Pacific’s rising geopolitical weight.
The Path Forward for Russian Navy
Still, Russia’s path to a meaningful naval resurgence lies in asymmetry. Unlike the Cold War era, it cannot afford a vast blue-water navy capable of global power projection. Instead, Moscow is betting on submarines, cruise missiles, and hypersonic weapons.
Kirov-Class Battlecruiser Russian Navy. Image Credit: Creative Commons.
The Yasen-class submarines, armed with Kalibr cruise missiles, represent a strategic investment in stealth and precision. Meanwhile, the Zircon hypersonic missile promises to give Russia a strategic edge, with the ability to threaten adversary naval assets from considerable distances.
These choices reflect Soviet-era thinking, when submarines played a central role in compensating for NATO’s carrier dominance. Yet even these limited ambitions face daunting challenges.
Western sanctions have sharply restricted Russia’s access to advanced propulsion technologies. Projects like the Admiral Gorshkov-class frigates have faced repeated delays due to reliance on Ukrainian engines. Domestic shipbuilding efforts, centered at Zvezda and Sevmash, remain hampered by inefficiencies and workforce shortages. The human capital deficit is no small obstacle. Modern naval warfare demands technical expertise, and Russia is struggling to cultivate the talent needed. With war costs mounting, sustaining long-term naval projects remains a questionable prospect.
Strategic partnerships may provide a partial solution. Joint naval exercises with China, such as those conducted in the Mediterranean and Pacific, suggest a growing maritime alignment. Access to Chinese shipbuilding technology could ease industrial bottlenecks, while Arctic collaborations might bolster Russia’s presence in key northern waters. Partnerships with India and other South Asian nations could also extend Moscow’s operational reach. Yet, these relationships carry risks. China’s ambitions in the Arctic, for instance, may not align with Russia’s long-term strategic objectives.
The Arctic remains Moscow’s most promising theater. As the region becomes more accessible, Russia’s Northern Fleet is poised to dominate. The Kremlin’s investments in ice-class warships and expanded port facilities reflect its determination. The Arctic’s resource wealth and its potential as a key maritime route between Europe and Asia offer both economic and strategic incentives. If Russia can secure this region, it will bolster its claim to great power status.
Russian aircraft carrier Admiral Kuznetsov (Picture source: Creative Commons.)
Rebuilding the Black Sea Fleet is equally critical. The Moskva’s loss dealt a blow to both operational capacity and strategic credibility. Control of Sevastopol remains essential, providing a gateway to the Mediterranean. Russia’s sustained presence in the Eastern Mediterranean, supported by operations out of Tartus during the Syrian conflict, underscores its determination to retain strategic depth. However, sustaining these outposts requires a robust domestic economy and political stability—both of which are far from guaranteed.
The Russian Navy Faces Key Questions
Whether Russia can restore its navy to project power beyond its littoral waters remains uncertain. Economic constraints, compounded by prolonged sanctions, limit the funding available for ambitious naval programs. Domestic political instability could further derail strategic priorities. Yet here lies the critical point: for Russia, the navy has always represented more than military capacity. It is a vessel of national ambition, an assertion of Russia’s place among the world’s great powers.
The Russian Navy’s return—if it happens—won’t be subtle or tentative. It will be deliberate, uncompromising, and unmistakable. Moscow believes the oceans are part of its rightful domain, and when Russia sails back into prominence, it will be with intent, with purpose, and with power. The world should be watching—closely.
About the Author: Dr. Andrew Latham
Andrew Latham is a non-resident fellow at Defense Priorities and a professor of international relations and political theory at Macalester College in Saint Paul, MN. Andrew is now a Contributing Editor to 19FortyFive, where he writes a daily column. You can follow him on X: @aakatham. This article first appeared in RealClearDefense.
More from 19FortyFive
The Army’s AbramsX Tank Is Getting ‘All the Attention’ for 1 Reason
Russia’s New Tu-160M Bomber Can Be Summed Up in Just 2 Words
