Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?


Nagasaki Was a Strike Against Japan and the Catholic Church


The closer we look at decisions to deploy a second atomic weapon against Japan on August 9, 76 years ago, the more morally audacious the tactic appears. Step outside the American explanatory cloud—we bombed military installations to force unconditional imperial surrender—defining public understanding to see: the US Government explicitly targeted civilian populations, a violation of international law and codes of military conduct.

Diplomats and archivists at the Vatican are convinced the attack against Nagasaki was a strike against Japan and the Catholic Church. They provide a rationale rarely discussed, in the face of general puzzlement over unexplained aspects of the tragedy.

Ground Zero: A Catholic Spiritual Center

The second atomic attack was a near-direct hit on Asia’s largest cathedral, in the country’s renowned Catholic settlement, Urakami, a residential district of Nagasaki—significantly north of the city’s commercial center and Mitsubishi’s shipyard.

The ties between Nagasaki and the Catholic Church go way back: A lord donated land to Jesuit missionaries from Portugal in 1580. The new religion spread so quickly it was outlawed as a threat to local rulers. Twenty-six martyrs were crucified in the city’s hills in 1597. The only port continuously open to foreign trade, it was a stronghold of secret faith during the long suppression of Christianity (1614-1873).

“Fat Man,” the plutonium implosion bomb detonated over Urakami, killed about 40,000 people immediately and another 30-40,000 by the end of the year. It decimated 71 percent of the Catholic community, many descendants of the “Hidden Christians” (Kakure Kirishitans), who concealed faith behind Shinto and Buddhist practice.

It was impossible for military planners not to know the area’s history and Catholic significance. So famous was this region as a spiritual center the charismatic Polish Franciscan, St. Maximilian Kolbe, opened a monastery there in 1930. (Eleven years later he was murdered in a concentration camp.)

The U.S. required visual bombing, not radar reliance. In the late morning on August 9, bombardier Kermit Beahan recalled seeing clouds open, and “the target was there, pretty as a picture.” What does the mission’s target map look like? We can’t know…it’s missing from the National Archives.

Hidden Hand Adds “Nagasaki”

President Harry Truman learned about the atomic weapons program when he took office. By then, operational momentum for testing both “gadgets,” a uranium bomb and plutonium implosion device, saturated decision-making.

A “target committee” appointed by the military, comprised of officers and nuclear scientists, zeroed in on the least humane option: detonating the bombs to maximize damage to entire cities of at least three miles diameter.

Yet, experienced war hands such as Dwight David Eisenhower, General of the Army, and General Omar Bradley, opposed their use. Eisenhower explained later, “Japan was already defeated and…dropping the bomb was completely unnecessary.”

Declassified documents portray Stimson as ambivalent: He decried civilian casualties of incendiary bombings, telling Truman on June 6 he didn’t want the US “to get the reputation of outdoing Hitler in atrocities.” While in Potsdam, he went directly to the president to request protection for the ancient city of Kyoto based on cultural value. Stimson reported in his diary, the president concurred.

Nagasaki did not show up on hit lists generated in May and June. Its mountainous, irregular terrain failed target committee preferences. Instead, the city was subjected to five rounds of brutal incendiary attacks. Top-tier A-bomb targets escaped firebombing so the catastrophic blast would get full credit for destruction. Allied POW camps in Nagasaki argued against obliterating it, too.

At the very last minute, Nagasaki appears as a potential target on a draft strike order dated July 24—as a handwritten add-on, coinciding with the July 24 Stimson-Truman meeting on targets.

A typed, Top Secret document commands that the US “will deliver its first special bomb” to “Hiroshima, Kokura, and Niigata in the priority listed.” In pen, someone struck “and” as well as “in the priority listed,” inserting with an arrow “and Nagasaki” after “Niigata.” The amended strike, order with Nagasaki added, was officially circulated the next day. According to historian Alex Wellerstein who first highlighted the document, the hand that added Nagasaki is unidentified.

Series of Unfortunate Events

Persistent American accounts of the second bombing mission posit a series of unfortunate events: The B-29 carrying Big Boy had fuel pump problems. It wasted inflight time waiting for a camera plane that never showed. Three times, it tried to target Kokura but couldn’t eyeball the hit. Then, its next target, Nagasaki, was concealed by cloud cover.

Japanese commentators have various theories but few think the US annihilated Urakami by mistake. Some believe the historic site was destroyed because the cathedral was used to store rice and other food supplies for the imperial army. An immediate scapegoating reflex emerged among non-Catholic Nagasaki survivors who blamed the blasphemous worship of a foreign god for bringing ruin to their city.

Several recent studies explore how Urakami’s Catholic hibakusha (atom bomb survivors) deployed the theology of martyrdom and forgiveness to make sense of the incomprehensible. Gwyn McClelland in Dangerous Memory in Nagasaki: Prayers, Protests, and Catholic Survivor Narratives and Chad Diehl in Resurrecting Nagasaki both point to the key role played by Dr. Takashi Nagai, a Catholic lay leader, hibakusha, and author of The Bells of Nagasaki.

In a eulogy for the dead in front of the cathedral’s ruins, Nagai called the bombing an act of providence: the sacrifice of innocent blood atoned for the sins of a world at war. This framing reassured Christian victims, but it had a silencing impact—reinforcing the self-suppression they practiced for 250 years. US command helped make “the saint of Urakami” a bestselling author: Nagai was the only hibakusha allowed to publish internationally.

For decades, occupation forces appropriated Nagai’s explanation, as did the Japanese—Emperor Hirohito visited Nagai personally—because it absolved both of responsibility.

What Rome Believes

The Vatican has never publicly discussed the bias it sees behind US willingness to stab Japan’s Catholic heart on Aug 9, 1945, but privately, archivists and experts in Rome remind me of an intense diplomatic row between Washington and Rome over Japan that marred relations throughout the war.

Three months after the attack on Pearl Harbor, Pope Pius XII established diplomatic ties with the imperial power in Tokyo. When the Church informed allied officials, they howled. Under Secretary of State Sumner Welles called the pope’s decision “deplorable.” President Franklin Roosevelt found it “unbelievable.” Pius’ response to Washington, according to a US envoy living in the Vatican was self-evident: diplomatic relations don’t mean approving all actions of a foreign interlocutor.

Interstate diplomacy is an essential way the Catholic Church protects its believers and advances its mission. When the emperor’s envoys approached Rome in 1942 with a proposal Rome had long sought, the Church, pragmatically, agreed. In its view, the Church had no choice but to engage because the empire’s advancing military was bringing more Catholics under Japanese control. Protecting the spiritual interests of some 20 million Catholics in Japanese-occupied territory was a fundamental responsibility.

Russia Lost Nuclear Weapons

‘Fat Man’ replica like the one dropped on Nagasaki. Image: Creative Commons.

Dealing “with the Devil in Person”

Pope Pius XI once said: “When there is question of saving souls, or preventing greater harm to souls, we feel the courage to treat with the devil in person.” The Holy See’s view of diplomacy as a forum for ministry to a broken world is often unappreciated by both secular and religious commentators who assume the Church should not compromise by engaging with immoral actors. Yet, in Pius XI’s view—as pontiffs before and since have concluded—the only way to influence a malevolent regime is to deal directly.

When the Urakami cathedral suffered a direct nuclear hit and the most historic Catholic community in Japan was obliterated, the Vatican saw it as American payback for its willingness to humanize an American enemy.

Victor Gaetan is senior international correspondent for the National Catholic Register and a contributor to Foreign Affairs magazine. His book God’s Diplomats: Pope Francis, Vatican Diplomacy, and America’s Armageddon was published last month by Rowman & Littlefield.

Image: Nagasaki bombing from Library of Congress. 

Editor’s Note: This article has been updated since publication. 

Written By

Victor Gaetan is senior international correspondent for the National Catholic Register and a contributor to Foreign Affairs magazine. His book God’s Diplomats: Pope Francis, Vatican Diplomacy, and America’s Armageddon was published last month by Rowman & Littlefield.



  1. Cara Capella

    August 8, 2021 at 9:26 pm

    The Nagasaki bomb was not called “Big Boy.” It was called “Fat Man.” The Hiroshima bomb, however, was called “Little Boy.”

  2. Commentar

    August 8, 2021 at 10:51 pm

    Interesting article. As an aside religion and politics should not mix, but few, if any, bother to acknowledge this rule. Ya can’t serve two masters.

    As annunder aside, it is common for people to want to try out new ideas or new experience or whatever. But when it comes to mystic religions, it is wise to look BEFORE you leap.

    People have (anecdotal) experience of trying out shinto worshipping but afterward abandoning it only later to find out strange shadows and/or strange happenings in their homes. Again, look before you leap.

  3. Slack

    August 8, 2021 at 11:10 pm

    The US employed the uranium bomb on hiroshima and the plutonium bomb on nagasaki and so historians later claimed these 2 bombs ended the war.

    It was not true. What ended the war was the declaration of war on japan by the USSR, just two days (less than 48 hours) after hiroshima.

    The declaration of war by the USSR was equivalent of a condemned man being taken straight to a guillotine.

    The fear generated by that dire prospect directly led to the decision to surrender, not the 2 bombs.

  4. HuntWorks

    August 8, 2021 at 11:16 pm

    The bomb was called Fat Man, not Fat Boy.

  5. Cyril Wisniewski

    August 8, 2021 at 11:29 pm

    “the charismatic German Franciscan, St. Maximum Kolbe“
    It is spelled Maximilian Kolbe, and he was Polish not German! You link to an article about this saint with the correct spelling and history. Perhaps you should read the articles you link to.

  6. Ken

    August 9, 2021 at 9:29 am

    As a Catholic American patriot I am astounded to find out that the Church in Japan was obliterated by our government.

  7. Tom Mc

    August 9, 2021 at 6:51 pm

    8500 out of 12000 is not 85%.

  8. Tony de Joux

    August 12, 2021 at 8:33 pm

    I suppose if you look at the past with enough time on your hands you can build any conspiracy theory.

    I presume that the writer was not alive at the time and therefore did not see the possibilities of millions of deaths (servicemen and civilians) if the Japanese home islands were to have been invaded

    Somehow the idea of a US war cabinet deciding to nuke Nagasaki (not the original target) seems rather unlikely: “Guys, if we can’t make the original target let’s wipe out the Catholc church in Japan”

    The writer has too much of a fervent imagination

  9. Robert Emanuel

    January 8, 2022 at 7:46 pm

    The declaration of war on Japan by Russia two days after Hiroshima did NOT end the war; if it did, then why was Nagasaki necessary to get the Emperor to break a 3-3 tie among the Japanese military chiefs MORE than two days later? So what if Russia had defeated Japan’s Kwantang Army in Manchuria? Japan had been embroiled there ten years, low on supplies, and suffered millions of casualties. Russia was almost totally focused far to the West, putting the final pressure on Berlin to grab postwar claims agreed upon with Churchill and FDR. Russia had not much more than its eyes to cry with: the U.S. had been supplying it since 1943, including thousands of new U.S. trucks carrying Russian troops and supplies into Berlin. That Japan feared the Russians MIGHT be believable – by a Russian! And no way could Russia have mounted a cross-sea invasion from Manchuria to the islands of Japan; the best they got was Sakahlin Island – out of negotiations with the U.S., the dominant power in postwar Japan. The U.S. needed Russia against Japan like Patton needed the French against the Germans. Who helped the U.S. in three years of island-hopping Pacific warfare, which brought Japan to its knees and lost it all of its Pacific gains since 1941? It was NOT Russia. If anything, the bombs saved Japan from a postwar greedy Russia – they scared the Russians into backing off from any vigorous pursuits of more than Sakhalin Island. Ironic, but true; the bombs kept Japan free.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *