Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Smart Bombs: Military, Defense and National Security

Bad News for Ukraine – Russian Troops Take City Center of Severodonetsk

Russia Ukraine
Russian TOS-1 Heavy Flame Thrower weapon system. Image Credit: Creative Commons.

Is Ukraine close to losing Donbas? After long and bloody fighting, Russian military forces have taken the center of the embattled city of Severodonetsk as they seek to encircle Ukrainian troops in the far eastern area of the industrial Donbas

Oleksandr Shtupun, a spokesman for Ukraine Defense Ministry, said Russian forces, behind heavy artillery fire support, continue to move deeper into the city. 

“In the Donetsk direction, the grouping of occupying troops are concentrating their main efforts on conducting offensive operations to encircle our troops in the areas of the cities of Severodonetsk and Lysychansk, blocking the logistics supply routes from the settlement of Bakhmut,” he said.

“The enemy, with support of artillery, carried out assault operations in the city of Severodonetsk, had partial success, pushed our units away from the city center,” the Ukrainian military said on its Facebook page

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said that the intense fighting inside the city, the last stronghold of Ukraine in the Luhansk province — Ukrainian troops were fighting for “literally every meter.” 

Serhiy Haidai, the governor of Luhansk province, said on Sunday,  that Russian forces targeted and destroyed a bridge over the Siverskyi Donets River linking Severodonetsk with the city of Lysychansk. And the last remaining bridge was in critical condition and will be targeted as well to cut off any civilians evacuating as well as Ukrainian troops.

“It is already impassable, and right now they are actively shelling the last, third bridge. As I understand, they just want to completely cut off Severodonetsk to make it impossible to evacuate people or bring in reinforcement there,” he said on Sunday.

Haidai said that he expects Russia to throw in all of their reserves to capture the remaining 30 percent of the city still in Ukrainian hands. Another area that Ukrainian forces are expecting assaults on are the areas around the Lysychansk-Bakhmut road, he said.

“If after new shelling the bridge collapses, the city will truly be cut off. There will be no way of leaving Severodonetsk in a vehicle,” he said, adding that there is no cease-fire agreement with Russian forces to get civilians and children out.

However, the Institute for the Study of War (ISW) stated that after the debacle of a Russian battalion being destroyed trying to cross the Siverskyi Donets River last month, Russian forces should be focusing on saving and seizing bridges over the river rather than destroying them. 

“They could hope to trap Ukrainian defenders in Severodonetsk by cutting off their retreat, but it seems unlikely that the benefit of catching a relatively small number of defenders would be worth the cost of imposing a contested river crossing on Russian troops,” the institute said in its assessment posted on Twitter on Sunday. 

Hundreds of Civilians Sheltering at the Azot Chemical Plant at Risk in Ukraine:

In a scenario that sounds eerily similar to what transpired in the port city of Mariupol, Ukrainian civilians are hiding in a large industrial plant in Severodonetsk and are trapped because of intense Russian shelling. 

“About 500 civilians remain on the territory of the Azot plant in Severodonetsk, 40 of them are children. Sometimes the military manages to evacuate someone,” Haidai said.

“The Russians are destroying quarter after quarter,” he added stating that the shelling caused a very large fire at the plant on Sunday. The Ukrainian government of President Zelensky reiterated the need for Western artillery, multiple launch rocket systems (MLRS), air defense artillery, and above all ammunition to successfully combat the Russian offensive in the Donbas. 

Steve Balestrieri is a 1945 National Security Columnist. He has served as a US Army Special Forces NCO and Warrant Officer before injuries forced his early separation. In addition to writing for and other military news organizations, he has covered the NFL for for over 10 years. His work was regularly featured in the Millbury-Sutton Chronicle and Grafton News newspapers in Massachusetts.

Written By

Steve Balestrieri is a 1945 National Security Columnist. He has served as a US Special Forces NCO and Warrant Officer before injuries forced his early separation. In addition to writing for 1945, he covers the NFL for and his work was regularly featured in the Millbury-Sutton Chronicle and Grafton News newspapers in Massachusetts.



  1. Rokko

    June 13, 2022 at 2:14 pm

    You forgot to comment that civilians are retained by ukrops, not by the Russians. They are the only shield against them.

  2. from Russia with love

    June 13, 2022 at 4:59 pm

    the news is out of date. The Armed Forces of Ukraine are stuck at the Azot plant and control only part of the industrial zone. there are about 400 Ukrainian soldiers and about 150 foreign mercenaries. the last bridge has already been destroyed. there is no escape option. I hope they are destroyed. Ukrainian occupiers have already come up with a proposal to exchange civilian hostages for a safe exit, they were refused. this is the question of who is the liberator and who is the occupier. an army defending its land does not change its population for the withdrawal of its own troops.

  3. Stefan Stackhouse

    June 13, 2022 at 7:29 pm

    Difficult question: Do you fight for every square meter, and risk depleting your forces sooner rather than later? Or do you retrieve your forces while you can, saving them to fight another day, hopefully after the enemy has overextended and depleted themselves? One can cite successful and unsuccessful examples for each alternative. The fact is that Ukraine is big and still has a lot of land that it could trade for time. While they have a lot of manpower, they don’t have a lot of matériel – at least not right now. Maybe they will eventually, once the allied supply lines have ramped up and the Ukrainians have been fully trained on the new weapons systems. I’d think that conserving their resources and buying time would be the better move, but I’m not there, and it isn’t up to me.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *