Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Smart Bombs: Military, Defense and National Security

Smart Move: The U.S. Military Wants More F-35s and Less F-15EX Fighters

A U.S. Air Force F-35A Lightning II flies over Israel in support of exercise Enduring Lightning III, Oct. 12, 2020. The United States and Israeli air forces train to maintain a ready posture to deter against regional aggression while forging strategic partnerships across the U.S. Central Command and U.S. European Command areas of responsibility. (U.S. Air Force photo by Senior Airman Duncan C. Bevan)

F-35 Gets More Funding in New Defense Bill – United States lawmakers have essentially ordered a reverse course on the Air Force’s planned buy of F-15EX Eagle II fighters. The service had sought to adopt the Boeing-made F-15EX as a replacement for its aging fleet of F-15C/D aircraft. However, the House Appropriations defense subcommittee earlier this week called for the purchase of the F-15EX to be scaled back to just 18 fighter jets, down from the 24 requested by the Air Force.

Instead, the United States Air Force will acquire additional Lockheed Martin F-35A Lightning II multi-role aircraft, seven more than originally planned in the Fiscal Year 2023 (FY23) budget. Moreover, the House Appropriations Committee draft fiscal year 2023 Defense funding bill would fund $2.2 billion for the continued development and modernization of the Joint Strike Fighter program.

The additional F-35As would bring the total number the Air Force would procure in 2023 to 40, while the budget would provide $7.2 billion for 61 new F-35 fighters, fully funding the administration’s request.

“The Fiscal Year 2023 Defense Appropriations bill is a responsible investment in our national security that will keep our nation strong and the American people safe,” said Defense Chair Betty McCollum (D-Minn.).

“The Subcommittee held a total of 18 hearings, both public and classified, to gather input from the Biden administration as we wrote this legislation which makes strategic investments in our national security needs in order to keep America safe, secure, and strong,” McCollum added.

F-35 Flying High

It isn’t just the United States Air Force that could see more F-35 aircraft in its fleet. The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) will also fully fund the U.S. Navy’s and United States Marine Corps’ requests for 15 F-35Bs and 13 F-35Cs.

In recent years, some U.S. lawmakers had been largely seen as the greatest threat to the F-35, citing high costs, yet, Russia and China are moving forward with their respective stealth fighter programs. As a result, officials are finally seeing a need for the Lockheed Martin fifth-generation aircraft.

However, the F-35 was designed to do what no single aircraft could do – and as a “Joint Strike Fighter,” it was developed to replace the United States Air Force’s A-10 and F-16, the United State Navy’s F/A-18, and the United States Marine Corps F/A-18 and AV-8B Harrier.

The single-engine, single-seat plane is unique in that it can operate as a conventional-takeoff-and-landing (CTOL) variant (F-35A) for the Air Force, while the Navy’s version (F-35C) was designed to operate from an aircraft carrier (CV). The United States Marine Corps, along with the UK’s Royal Air Force and Royal Navy, employ the F-35B, which can operate as a short-takeoff/vertical landing (STOVL) fighter.

The F-35 is now the backbone of allied airpower for a multitude of nations including the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, Italy, Japan, Israel, the Netherlands, Norway, and South Korea – while Belgium, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Poland, Switzerland, and Thailand have either ordered or expressed interest in flying high with the aircraft.

To date, the U.S. military has ordered approximately 2,400 F-35 Lightning IIs, while another 900 had been ordered from 15 foreign clients. Lockheed Martin has delivered around 750 of those as of the end of last year.

Now a Senior Editor for 1945, Peter Suciu is a Michigan-based writer who has contributed to more than four dozen magazines, newspapers and websites. He regularly writes about military hardware, firearms history, cybersecurity and international affairs. Peter is also a Contributing Writer for Forbes.

Written By

Expert Biography: A Senior Editor for 1945, Peter Suciu is a Michigan-based writer who has contributed to more than four dozen magazines, newspapers, and websites with over 3,000 published pieces over a twenty-year career in journalism. He regularly writes about military hardware, firearms history, cybersecurity, and international affairs. Peter is also a Contributing Writer for Forbes. You can follow him on Twitter: @PeterSuciu.



  1. Jacksonian Libertarian

    June 17, 2022 at 2:06 pm

    Stealth is the future, and the F-35 is the only stealth aircraft being produced in large numbers. Because Russia doesn’t have stealth aircraft, it has been incapable of gaining air superiority in Ukraine. Without the strategic advantage of air superiority, Russian forces have been getting decimated.
    The Pilots cabal in the military is viciously opposed to replacing manned aircraft with thousands of cheap attritable long range drones like the XQ-58A Valkyrie at $2 million each. Air defense and air to air missiles cost nearly as much as the Valkyrie, and stealth is less important when there isn’t a Pilot or a $100 million dollar aircraft at risk.
    It’s a shame the military isn’t buying hundreds of Valkyries every year.

  2. RepublicansLovePutin&hateAmerica

    June 17, 2022 at 5:55 pm

    No its a stupid move. Turkey-35 is too slow and fat to keep with other planes. IRST can see and lock on to it easily. No has speed or maneuverability and it can’t climb to reach any sort of flight ceiling. It can’t even fly at Mach 1 without falling apart.
    F-15EX has everything that the Turke-35 has except stealth, which matters little against anything with IRST.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *