Summary and Key Points: The UK’s Royal Navy operates two advanced Queen Elizabeth-class aircraft carriers, each capable of projecting fifth-generation airpower with vertical take-off and landing F-35Bs.
-Slightly smaller than the U.S. Navy’s Ford-class carriers, the British carriers carry fewer aircraft but maintain significant strategic power.
-Their unique “ski-jump” design allows F-35B operations without catapults. Enhanced interoperability with U.S. Marine Corps amphibious assault ships further strengthens their capability.
-Joint exercises demonstrate successful integration, showcasing combined strength and mobility.
-The Queen Elizabeth class significantly enhances Britain’s ability to conduct global maritime operations and project airpower in coordination with allies.
UK’s Queen Elizabeth Carriers: Powering Global Air Supremacy with F-35Bs
The United Kingdom’s Royal Navy operates two Queen Elizabeth-class aircraft carriers, ships armed with a collection of vertical take-off and landing F-35Bs in position to project 5th-generation air power far from Britain’s shores.
The two UK carriers, emerging in 2014 and 2017, enabled the UK to form its own Carrier Strike Groups able to project power and, if needed, launch air attacks from locations throughout the world. The UK ships operate at 80,600 tons, roughly 20 tons lighter or smaller than 100-ton United States Navy Ford-class carriers.
One significant reason for the weight difference likely pertains to deck size and width, as the Ford-class carriers stretch 1,092 ft and the Queen Elizabeth ships are 932 ft long. Width, hangar space for storage, and electric elevators enable the Ford to move and launch a much greater number of aircraft.
US Navy Ford-class carriers, for example, can easily launch and operate as many as 50 or more F-35Cs. In contrast, the UK’s Queen Elizabeth class can carry a maximum of 36 F-35Bs in wartime and typically averages 12-24 F-35Bs under normal deployment conditions.
The Queen Elizabeth carriers incorporate a slight “ski-jump” configuration instead of a large flat deck because they do not operate with a catapult.
The absence of a catapult, which enables massive F-35C launch from a carrier deck in the case of the USS Ford, means the Queen Elizabeth can only launch vertical-take-off-and-landing F-35Bs.
However, this maritime 5th-generation power projection capability is massively fortified by a growing ability to interoperate with F-35B-capable ships such as amphibious assault ships. With both ships configured to operate F-35B, US Marine Corps amphibs and a UK Queen Elizabeth carrier could take off and land F-35Bs on each other’s ships.
Such an ability, strengthened by the F-35’s common, multi-national Multi-Function Data Link (MADL) connecting US and UK F-35s, massively expands mobility and air power projection capability.
The US Marine Corps and UK Royal Navy practiced this as far back as 2020 during a three-day joint exercise in the North Sea.
This training exercise was explained in detail in a 2020 essay by The National Interest.
“During the attack operations, planes from both countries dropped 500lb Paveway IV bombs onto a dedicated range. Commander Mark Sparrow Royal Navy, commanding officer of 617 Squadron, said the exercise began with high optempo deck operations on board the carrier,” the National Interest stated in 2020.
“That was a springboard for the next phase, which was to load live weapons on the aircraft, which we had not done from HMS Queen Elizabeth before. It was an opportunity to end-to-end test all the systems within the ship and the squadron, from building and loading the weapons all the way through to successfully releasing them on target,” Sparrow said in the UK Royal Navy report.
About the Author: Kris Osborn
Kris Osborn is the Military Technology Editor of 19FortyFive and President of Warrior Maven – Center for Military Modernization. Osborn previously served at the Pentagon as a highly qualified expert in the Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army—Acquisition, Logistics & Technology. Osborn has also worked as an anchor and on-air military specialist at national TV networks. He has appeared as a guest military expert on Fox News, MSNBC, The Military Channel, and The History Channel. He also has a Masters Degree in Comparative Literature from Columbia University.
