Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Smart Bombs: Military, Defense and National Security

NGAD Will Be Much More Than a New 6th Generation Stealth Fighter

6th Generation Fighter
Image: Creative Commons.

The development of the United States Air Force’s Next-Generation Air Dominance (NGAD) program has steadily progressed and recently reached a new phase of development. Described as a “family of systems,” the goal of NGAD, which originated from a DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) Air Dominance Initiative study in 2014, is to field a new fighter aircraft in the 2030s to replace the F-22 Raptor. It wouldn’t be a single aircraft, however, and instead, it will likely include a number of manned and unmanned systems.

“We are working on the actual design of the aircraft … so that means we are in the engineering, manufacturing development phase,” Air Force Secretary Frank Kendall, the service’s top civilian official, told reporters at the Air and Space Force Association’s annual conference in National Harbor, Maryland on Sept. 19.

Kendall added that the current goal is to start production of the aircraft “by the end of the decade.”

NGAD: Drone On

Kendall also reaffirmed that the loyal wingman concept still remains part of the overall NGAD program, and the future fighter could be accompanied by four to five unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). These robotic wingmen would carry a variety of payloads and perform a number of different tasks – which could be determined by the manned aircraft.

“You can think of it as the quarterback or play caller for that information,” Kendall added.

It could be very much a team effort – with one carrying sensors, another serving as a “bomb truck,” while another could be used as a decoy to draw enemy fire. Though they wouldn’t be mere pawns to be sacrificed, the goal would still be to protect the human pilot and make sure he/she is able to do the job and get home safely.

In other words, the drones would be expendable to ensure mission success while lessening the risk to the pilot.

“There’s a willingness to put some of those platforms at risk in order to get an operational advantage,” Kendall suggested.

A variety of multi-mission drones, which have been dubbed Collaborative Combat Aircraft (CCA), could act as the loyal wingmen for the manned NGAD fighter. These could also test enemy air defenses, blanket high-risk areas with forward surveillance, and even deliver weapons. The human(s) in the manned aircraft would still perform the command and control (C&C).

The Air Force has also expressed interest in the Boeing MQ-28 Ghost Bat, which was developed for the Australian military. It was designed to operate as part of a team, using artificial intelligence to extend the capabilities of crewed and uncrewed platforms.

Kendall told reporters in August that he has talked with his Australian counterparts about the NGAD family of systems, and how they (Australia) might be able to participate. “I think there’s a lot of mutual interest in working together,” Kendall explained. “And we’re gonna be sorting out the details over the next few weeks.”

The MQ-28, which was originally known as the Airpower Teaming System (ATS), is also being offered by Boeing for the U.S. Air Force’s Skyborg loyal wingman program. It has been described as a wide-ranging initiative that encompasses a variety of systems that will form an artificial intelligence-driven “computer brain” that is capable of flying both networked loyal wingman-type drones as well as more autonomous unmanned combat air vehicles or UCAVs. It was also designed from the outset to be a modular platform that could be tailored for specific needs – thus well-suited to the NGAD program.

A Senior Editor for 1945, Peter Suciu is a Michigan-based writer who has contributed to more than four dozen magazines, newspapers, and websites with over 3,000 published pieces over a twenty-year career in journalism. He regularly writes about military hardware, firearms history, cybersecurity, and international affairs. Peter is also a Contributing Writer for Forbes. You can follow him on Twitter: @PeterSuciu.

Written By

Expert Biography: A Senior Editor for 1945, Peter Suciu is a Michigan-based writer who has contributed to more than four dozen magazines, newspapers, and websites with over 3,000 published pieces over a twenty-year career in journalism. He regularly writes about military hardware, firearms history, cybersecurity, and international affairs. Peter is also a Contributing Writer for Forbes. You can follow him on Twitter: @PeterSuciu.

2 Comments

2 Comments

  1. Jacksonian Libertarian

    September 25, 2022 at 12:31 am

    “The human(s) in the manned aircraft would still perform the command and control (C&C).”

    So the manned aircraft is just the command and control node?

    Let me get this straight, the insanely expensive ($400+ million) manned combat aircraft and juicy target for the enemy, does no combat? 100+ fighting UAVs could be fielded for that price.

    Highly stealthed unmanned RQ-180 ISR aircraft/networking nodes are flying at 70,000ft over contested air space. All UAVs are remotely piloted, with commanders, intelligence, operations, mission planners, etc. looking over their shoulders.

    UAV’s need command & control from combat pilots, like a fish needs a bicycle.

  2. cobo

    September 25, 2022 at 3:15 pm

    Having the human commander in the mix is vital. For all the robot potential, it doesn’t have the gut intuition (disparage as you may) of the human, and there is no robot system that cannot be hacked. I see no reasong to believe the flight commander won’t have his own weapons, perhaps the most lethal.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Advertisement