Summary and Key Points: The AbramsX, developed by General Dynamics Land Systems, marks a revolutionary leap forward in tank technology, featuring hybrid-electric propulsion, drone-launching capabilities, and an unmanned turret.
-At just 60 tons, it’s lighter and more maneuverable than current Abrams tanks, yet offers advanced survivability with a hemispheric active protection system capable of countering top-down missile threats.
-Its hybrid-electric design allows for silent operations, significantly reducing logistic vulnerabilities.
-Additionally, AbramsX integrates the flexible “Katalyst” system for seamless incorporation of future tech upgrades.
-By combining unprecedented firepower, agility, and intelligence capabilities, AbramsX could profoundly transform battlefield operations, securing American armored dominance for decades to come.
-This tank has one goal: successfully replacing the old and legendary M1 Abrams. Can it do it?
AbramsX: Revolutionizing Tank Warfare with Hybrid-Electric Power
GDLS revealed its AbramsX at the 2022 Association of the United States Army Annual Symposium as an offering or vehicle for the Army to consider. The forthcoming AbramsX promises to deliver major innovations in MBT warfare.
GDLS developers have explained a number of key elements, including an unmanned turret, the ability to launch drones, fire course-correcting ammunition, operate 360-degree thermal sites, evolving AI-enabled command and control capability, and new generations of sensor data processing and integration.
If AbramsX can deliver on all its promises, it could be the best take on Earth and a game-changer for the U.S. Army.
Next Generation Abrams
The AbramsX is a 60-ton offering designed to be a little faster, more mobile, and more expeditionary than the existing Abrams. The vehicles’s abilities are purported to be something that could massively improve their ability to cross bridges, enter strategically vital passageways, and perhaps keep pace with maneuvering infantry and lighter vehicles on the move.
The lighter-weight offering also addresses ongoing Army concerns about the current Abram tank weight, referring to its 70-ton weight, which could limit the platform’s mobility and deployability to a certain extent.
AbramsX Faster at 60-Tons
While the 70-ton Abrams tanks remain highly relevant and critical, a 60-ton Abrams such as the “X” would introduce key advantages for next-generation combat formations.
The 60-ton weight was achieved without compromising the kind of survivability and protection implicitly vital to the Abrams tank. Army and industry developers are increasingly emphasizing “innovation,” meaning efforts to conduct out-of-the-box next-generation research and study to uncover new impactful technologies and areas of “breakthrough” or “disruptive” discovery.
Perhaps this means lighter-weight composites, which are already being integrated in several key places across the force. The technology could include high-resolution sensors that are longer-range and more precise than even news Abrams models.
AbramsX and Drones
It is believed that the AbramsX is being engineered with the ability to launch and operate “attack” drones while on the move in combat, which massively expands lethality, forward surveillance, and multi-domain, AI-enabled, networked target data identification and distribution.
The AbramsX is hybrid-electric, a power system that expands operational capacity in several respects. A hybrid-electric propulsion system reduces the need for a heavy logistic trail to transport massive amounts of fuel, which can slow down advancing forces and also create a vulnerability in terms of sustainment while putting logistical forces at risk of attack.
The Abrams X’s ability to control unmanned systems meets the emerging operational requirements envisioned by the Army, which is to engineer a robotic “ammo” carrying platform to bring supplies, ammunition, and fuel into high-risk forward locations without placing manned crews at risk.
Hybrid electric propulsion also enables “silent watch,” meaning the vehicle can operate at a forward location without emitting a thermal or acoustic signature, which might give away the position to an enemy.
Essentially, a silent watch allows the sensors and electronics to operate without an acoustic or thermal signature generated by an engine.
Active Protection to Stop RPGs
GDLS is also working with partners to build a “hemispheric” Active Protection System for the tank, designed to detect, track, and intercept or destroy incoming RPGs and Anti-Tank Guided Missiles.
APS systems use a sensor, computer processor, and fire control system to track an approaching threat and shoot out an “interceptor” capable of destroying an incoming enemy round. Interestingly, the GDLS APS is built with the ability to protect the tank from top-down anti-armor attacks.
While hemispheric APS has always been an ongoing goal for armored vehicles, events in Ukraine undoubtedly influenced or informed GDLS APS. Ukrainian forces have had great success destroying Russian tanks by firing top-down missile attacks at the more vulnerable “top” part of a tank.
All of these innovations, GDLS developers say, are in large measure being brought to fruition through the use of an IP protocol referred to as “Katalyst,” a technical configuration designed to use open standards to enable or accommodate the addition and integration of new technologies as they emerge.
With “Katalyst,” GDLS and Army developers will be able to use software upgrades to improve sensing resolutions, targeting precision and onboard command and control systems.
Katalyst can also support “interfaces” using common, interoperable standards to support information sharing both on the vehicle and among other players throughout multiple domains.
About the Author: Kris Osborn
Kris Osborn is the President of Warrior Maven–Center for Military Modernization. Osborn previously served at the Pentagon as a highly qualified expert in the Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army—Acquisition, Logistics & Technology. Osborn has also worked as an anchor and on-air military specialist at national TV networks. He has appeared as a guest military expert on Fox News, MSNBC, The Military Channel, and The History Channel. He also has a Master’s Degree in Comparative Literature from Columbia University.

Phillip Wilson
April 17, 2025 at 5:36 pm
I suspect you used AI to help write this article due to incorrect words being in two obvious places in the article. Please have an actual human proofread the thing before publishing as it’s distracting to unexpectedly run across those words.
Barry Brewer
April 17, 2025 at 6:20 pm
Primary purpose is to generate bonuses for GD executives
Charles C.
April 18, 2025 at 8:43 am
Ukraine war has shown how vulnerable tanks are to fpv drones. This article should address that.
Marc Hills
April 18, 2025 at 1:50 pm
You misspelled “sight” in reference to “thermal sites”. Also, based on the context of the sentence containing “out-of-the-box next-generation research”, I think you’re confusing the expression with “outside-of-the-box”. Out-of-the-box” is synonymous with “off-the-shelf” and is virtually the opposite of “next-generation”. Overall, a poorly written article that contains strong indications the author relied heavily on AI.
GhostTomahawk
April 18, 2025 at 7:07 pm
So in other words… this tank doesn’t exist and won’t exist. There is no electric engine anywhere on earth that can fit into a TANK that is also a fuel burning engine and still comes in under 60 tons.
Pipe dream.