Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Uncategorized

Introducing the Ford-Class: The Navy’s Plan for the Largest Aircraft Carrier Ever

Ford-class
Ford-Class Aircraft Carrier Artist Rendering. Image Credit: Creative Commons.

The US Navy has big plans for a new generation of aircraft carriers that could transform the fleet – but they are pricey. Meet the Ford-class: The USS Gerald R. Ford aircraft carrier comes with a high price tag in return for its cutting-edge technology.

At $13.3 billion, this is around 30 percent more than what the Navy promised it would cost and two times the cost of the last flat-top built. America’s largest and most expensive carrier is exciting due to the modernization of traditional carrier tools such as arresting gear, elevators, and launch systems. The Ford is supposed to save billions over the next 50 years due to lower maintenance costs and the need for a smaller crew. But what exorbitant spending on trivial things it has endured – a clogged toilet, for example, set the Navy back $400,000.

Ballooning Costs Surprises the U.S. Government

There are four Ford-class carriers in various stages of construction and this supercarrier will eventually be replacing the entire aircraft carrier fleet. But it’s this construction that has ballooned the carrier’s cost and time to build. The cost estimate for the entire Ford-class is $120 billion versus the original estimate of $77.3 billion, according to a U.S. Government Accountability Office report.

Ford-Class: More Man Hours Than the Empire State Building

“More than five thousand shipbuilders worked an estimated 49 million hours to build the Ford. That’s seven times the hours logged when building the Empire State Building,” according to a video posted by Business Insider last September.

Better to Do Only One or Two New Technologies at a Time

The new technologies on the arresting gear, elevators, and launch mechanisms have all gone over budget, and naval leadership and think tank analysts believe that working on more than two new technologies at a time on one huge ship was a mistake. It led to five years in delays for the new carrier. For example, just researching and testing the electromagnetic catapult system cost one billion dollars, while the installation was $670 million.

According to some critics, the Navy should have proved out the technologies first before trying to force the modernizations on board as the Ford was built.

Go With Mature Technology First

Mandy Smithberger, at the Project On Government Oversight, or POGO, said some of the mistakes made by the Navy on large ship-building projects have shot the branch in the foot. The Navy’s practices of “developing really complex technology that’s expensive to maintain and not reliable,” has been a major hurdle. “It’s not necessarily that it’s new technology but it’s immature — so it has to be proven technology,” added Smithberger.

Ford-Class: Not All Is Bad

Sometimes the complaints about the Ford-class seem overly critical. When everything works according to plan, the flight deck operations run like a well-oiled machine. The Navy believes that due to the new arresting and launch systems, the carrier can run aircraft sorties up to 30 percent faster. More aircraft can fit on deck due to the ship’s smaller island. The advanced arresting gear is more efficient, and it is computer-aided for better safety for the aviators.

But the acquisition program has been problematic. One hopes that the lessons learned about the Ford can be used to improve the cost and schedule of other carriers in the class such as the Kennedy and Enterprise.

The Worst Part Is Behind It on the Ford-Class

The Ford-class may be a cautionary tale, but it has made it past the most difficult parts of its acquisition cycle. The ship will be ready for combat this year and there are certainly dangerous neighborhoods the Navy must patrol. Therefore, the Navy will have a huge asset to lead carrier battle groups in hot spots around the world.

Now serving as 1945’s Defense and National Security Editor, Brent M. Eastwood, PhD, is the author of Humans, Machines, and Data: Future Trends in Warfare. He is an Emerging Threats expert and former U.S. Army Infantry officer. You can follow him on Twitter @BMEastwood.

Written By

Now serving as 1945s New Defense and National Security Editor, Brent M. Eastwood, PhD, is the author of Humans, Machines, and Data: Future Trends in Warfare. He is an Emerging Threats expert and former U.S. Army Infantry officer.

3 Comments

3 Comments

  1. Jacky

    April 6, 2022 at 6:07 pm

    Carriers are useless today, as shown by recent battlefield use of the kinzhal.

    Carriers are only useful when used for enforcing regime change on sanctions-hit countries or hunger(famine)-stricken nations.

    But will carrier battle groups ever converge on (a half-starved) Russia, in such a situation.

    Answer is no, cuz, unlike pushovers such as Libya, Iraq, Grenada, panama,etc,.. Russia possesses rs-28 doomsday tools or death-dealing weaponry.

  2. G man

    April 7, 2022 at 12:18 pm

    Once again an Army dude writing about ships? Go dig a hole, fill some sand bags and crawl in it to feel better. Where did you get you Phd? “Pay your fees get your B’s Univ. Of Phoenix “?

  3. franklin l smith

    April 7, 2022 at 4:50 pm

    I strongly feel that the carrier is of the utmost importance. Having an airfield anywhere in the world is a very important part of statagy. It sets close off shore with a battle group ready at all times to support forces on the ground. It can also be used for patrolling the oceans of the world and answering any call by any country that is in dier need.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Advertisement