Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Uncategorized

Nazi Germany’s Best WWII Tank? Meet the Panther

Panther Tank
Panther Tank

The Panther: Was this Hitler’s best WWII tank built to fight Russia? In August 2021, an 84-year-old man in Germany was convicted of illegal weapons possession and was fined nearly $300,000 along with a suspended prison sentence of 14 months. The man, who was a life-long militaria collector, had stored a World War II-era Panther tank in the basement of his home in Heikendorf in Northern Germany.

While his defense team had argued that the tank’s 75mm main gun was no longer functional, he hadn’t actually broken Germany’s War Weapons Control Act, yet the prosecutors were able to convince the court that the weapons could still be used. As a result, on August 2, the man was ordered to sell or donate the tank – as well as an anti-aircraft cannon also in his possession – to a museum or licensed collector within the next two years. It had taken a team of 20 Bundeswehr soldiers nearly nine hours to remove the tank and other military hardware from the unnamed man’s home.

This was a significant find, as there are less than two dozen surviving examples of the World War II Panther tank, and of those only six are operational. The example in the UK’s Tank Museum – considered the best museum of armored vehicles in the world – actually has an example that was produced in the German factory in Hannover under British supervision following the Second World War.

Developed to Confront the T-34

In the closing months of 1941, it had become clear to the German General Staff that its tanks were outclassed by the Soviet Red Army’s mighty T-34.

Even the Panzer IV, which was Germany’s mostly numerously-produced tank and heaviest front line tank in service at the outbreak of the war, proved no match for the Soviet tank. Tank-vs.-tank classes during the 1941 invasion had demonstrated that a new design was urgently needed to counter the T-34, and the Panzer V program became a priority.

The design was rushed into production before testing was even completed. The result was the formidable Panzer V, which became known as the Panther. Widely considered to be one of the best tanks developed during the Second World War, it wasn’t without some teething problems, however, when it was first deployed in combat. Its shortcomings were demonstrated in the battles around Kursk in 1943, where the tank often broke down in the harsh Russian terrain.

Improved versions of the Panther eliminated most of the mechanical troubles, and it fulfilled the requirements needed by the German Army for a tank with a powerful gun, good mobility and good armor protection.

Big Cat With Claws

The main armament of the Panther was the long-barreled 75mm (2.95-inch) gun, while secondary weapons consisted of three 7.92mm MG34 machine guns including one coaxial, on-anti-aircraft and one hull front. Seventy-nine rounds of ammunition for the main gun could be carried within the tank.

The 44.8-tonne tank was a true behemoth. It had a crew of five including a driver, radio operator/hull machine gun, gunner, loader, and commander. Three of the crewmen were positioned in the massive turret. The tank was produced in armor ranging in thickness from 1.2 to 4.3-inches.

The Panther was powered by a Maybach HL 230 12-cylinder diesel developing 522kW, which provided 700 horsepower. The tank had a top road speed of 29mph and a range of 110 miles.

It was also noted for having a suspension system that was far more complicated than that of the Russian T-34. It had torsion bars and 18 overlapping road wheels on each side. Wide tracks helped spread the Panther’s weight when traveling over soft ground.

An improved version – the Panther Ausf G variant – also was provided with additional armor protection and an improved power train with better exhaust handling, but production of all models of the Panther was slow and there were simply never enough of them to make a serious difference in the fighting in Russia, Italy or northwest Europe.

Only about 6,000 Panthers were built during the war, compared to 57,000 T-34s and more than 50,000 U.S. Sherman M4 tanks.

Now a Senior Editor for 1945, Peter Suciu is a Michigan-based writer who has contributed to more than four dozen magazines, newspapers and websites. He regularly writes about military hardware, and is the author of several books on military headgear including A Gallery of Military Headdress, which is available on Amazon.com. Peter is also a Contributing Writer for Forbes.

Written By

Peter Suciu is a Michigan-based writer who has contributed to more than four dozen magazines, newspapers and websites. He is the author of several books on military headgear including A Gallery of Military Headdress, which is available on Amazon.com. Suciu is also a contributing writer for Forbes Magazine.

3 Comments

3 Comments

  1. Edi

    May 22, 2022 at 2:51 pm

    What a bizarre article. Statistically, the panther was a failure, probably the worst tank widely used in the war. Looks good on paper, but with an ungodly amount of flaws, most of which were in fact never resolved.
    Also, 54 % of T-34 tanks in 1941 were destroyed by Panzer 3 and 4, which shows that they were quite capable of beating those “superior” Soviet tanks.

  2. speedster

    May 22, 2022 at 6:23 pm

    Production of the panther was slow according to the article, which agreed with what I’ve heard regarding German tanks in the second world war, that the tanks were technically complex. It’s no good having a formidable weapon, if it cannot be produced in sufficient quantities to impact the military effort.

    The quantities of tanks produced by the usa and Russia, make it likely that both countries kept the basic design simple enough to enable mass production. I would stress that although the Russian tank production figure exceeded the usa figure, Russia was able to concentrate tank production to the exclusion of much else, because the usa provided so much aid in the form of most transport trucks and locomotives to Russia.

    • Him

      May 22, 2022 at 11:38 pm

      You wrote: “It’s no good having a formidable weapon, if it cannot be produced in sufficient quantities to impact the military effort.”

      In a WW3 scenario, there the evil axis of Russia, China, Fat Boy and Iran form an Axis against the West – and given the long time needed to manufacture everything from shoulder anti-tank weapons, cruise missiles and fighter jets – plus the spectre of chip shortages – one wonders how a WW3 scenario would play out in terms of logistics.

      Possibly, when the cupboard is bare of conventional high-tech weapons, it would shift quickly to use of nukes. The Bible, in its last book – The Book of Revelation – prophesies 1/3rd of mankind being killed.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Advertisement