Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Uncategorized

The Navy’s Plan for a Flying Aircraft Carrier Was Destined to Fail

USS Nimitz
DA NANG, Vietnam (March 5, 2018) The Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS Carl Vinson (CVN 70) arrives in Da Nang, Vietnam for a scheduled port visit. The Carl Vinson Strike Group is in the Western Pacific as part of a regularly scheduled deployment.

Flying Aircraft Carrier Concept Failure – The mighty aircraft carrier still rules the world’s oceans as the top warship that to many seem completely unkillable. But what if the idea of an aircraft carrier could be taken to the next level, somehow making these weapons of war fly high into the sky and creating an even more potent platform? The idea has been considered and acted upon in a very strange way – and it failed for some clear reasons: 

We were promised flying cars, but were we promised flying aircraft carriers too? There are at least five startups currently working on flying cars. These are so-called urban aircraft of some type in a market that could be worth $1.5 trillion by 2040. There are also some who believe flying aircraft carriers could be part of a future mix for the U.S. Navy someday. But did you know that there were once bona fide operational flying aircraft carriers? Turn back the clock to the early 1930s to learn more about the exploits of these curious flying carriers.

Aircraft Carrier Sunset

020306-N-6492H-510
At sea aboard USS John F. Kennedy (CV 67) Mar. 6, 2002 — The sun rises behind USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN 71), as it prepares to turn over operations to the John F. Kennedy Battle Group. The Kennedy and her embarked Carrier Air Wing (CVW) are relieving the Roosevelt to conduct missions in support of Operation Enduring Freedom. U.S. Navy photo by PhotographerÕs Mate 1st Class Jim Hampshire. (RELEASED)

Flying Aircraft Carrier: What Is a Rigid Airship?

The USS Akron and USS Macon were “rigid airships” that served the U.S. Navy. Construction started in 1929. With a three-keel design, the Akron-class dirigibles had a better framework than the original German zeppelins. The eight 560 horsepower Maybach VL-2 engines were positioned inside the airship for easier maintenance and less drag. The propellors remained outside the aircraft and could be folded downward for take-off and landing. You can watch a video showing the airship’s manufacture and first flight here.

This Cute Little Airplane Served an Important Purpose

Ostensibly for reconnaissance and spying purposes, airships were also configured to carry airplanes such as the F9C-2 Curtiss Sparrowhawk mini-biplanes. These could be launched and recovered from the humongous airship. Only eight of the tiny craft were made to be carried by the Navy’s helium-filled dirigibles. The Navy envisioned the 20-foot-long Sparrowhawks to actually attack the enemy with their .30-inch machine guns and at the very least be used to lengthen the range of the airship.

Flying Aircraft Carrier: Protecting the Homeland

The Akron and the Macon were designed to spot any bogey trying to fly into U.S. airspace or enemy vessel sailing near the coast. The airships and the Sparrowhawks gave better spying range than what was provided by the naval surface fleet. Protecting the homeland by patrolling the coast was the main mission for the airships.

Stunning Exploits With a Flying Trapeze

The Akron had a hangar deck within the airship that included a T-shape with a 75-foot by 60-foot opening for the Sparrowhawks. The airplanes dangled out of the hangar with a curious and dangerous-looking trapeze. It took a talented pilot to maneuver the Sparrowhawk into recovery mode with the sky hook. The National Air and Space museum described the difficulty. “The pilot skillfully guided the overhead hook on the airplane to the horizontal bar of the extended recovery trapeze. Once the fighter had hooked on, its engine was stopped and the trapeze was raised into the open belly of the dirigible, and the airplane was stored in special racks.”

Bad Luck Akron

The Akron endured deadly accidents and mishaps during its short operational period. Two sailors died during a mooring incident in 1932. There was another accident outside a hangar that year. In 1933, the Akron staged its most significant feat with a flight to Florida, Cuba, and Panama. It tested launch and recovery of its airplanes along the way.

The End of the Flying Aircraft

Then in April of 1933, the worst airship crash in history happened. The Akron was patrolling off the coast of New Jersey when it encountered stormy conditions. Its tail hit the water and the entire ship entered the water and was destroyed. For unknown reasons, the dirigible contained no life preservers and only one raft. The sailors who were not killed immediately drowned or struggled in the cold water and expired due to hypothermia. Seventy-three hands died and then two more men perished when a rescue blimp crashed while looking for survivors. This was worse than the Hindenburg tragedy that only killed 36 people.

The Akron and Macon seemed like a good idea at the time, although the Navy knew the airship had to remain in the rear and depend on its recon airplanes to scout the coast. It would be a fat target for enemy warplanes when flying ahead. Having an eye in the sky to watch over the coastline was going to be valuable though. Credit should also be given for the amazing feat of launching and recovering airplanes from the airships. The Akron-class dirigibles were at just as high a risk despite the advanced technology that was used during their construction.

Submarines can still see the wreckage of the Akron as it rests on the bottom of the ocean near Atlantic City, New Jersey.

Now serving as 1945s New Defense and National Security Editor, Brent M. Eastwood, PhD, is the author of Humans, Machines, and Data: Future Trends in Warfare. He is an Emerging Threats expert and former U.S. Army Infantry officer.

Written By

Now serving as 1945s New Defense and National Security Editor, Brent M. Eastwood, PhD, is the author of Humans, Machines, and Data: Future Trends in Warfare. He is an Emerging Threats expert and former U.S. Army Infantry officer.

1 Comment

1 Comment

  1. Omega 13

    August 11, 2022 at 4:15 pm

    With regard to flying cars, they’re never going to be a thing. Why? Three dimensions, not two. Your engine fails on a road and you coast to the side… it fails in mid air and you coast straight to the scene of the crash. Lawsuits-a-gogo.

    Second, people are crappy drivers. They’ll make even crappier pilots. Can you imagine all the traffic buzzing all over the place in the air, without the benefit of roads? There won’t be traffic controllers for thousands or hundreds of thousands of cars.

    Like self-driving cars, this is a stupid idea that won’t ever happen.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Advertisement