Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Smart Bombs: Military, Defense and National Security

Putin Unleashed Missile Hell on Ukraine (And More Is Coming)

Javelin
1st Lt. Ryan Rogers assigned to 3rd Battalion, 187th Infantry Regiment, 3rd Brigade Combat Team, 101st Airborne Division (Air Assault), fires the Javelin shoulder-fired anti-tank missile during platoon live fire exercise at Fort Campbell, Ky. Jan. 30, 2019. (U.S. Army Photo by Capt. Justin Wright)

Russia launched its biggest air strike campaign since the beginning of the war in Ukraine early on Monday morning, targeting the capital city of Kyiv, as well as Lviv, Ternopil, and Zhytomyr in western Ukraine.

Central Ukraine also came under fire, with rockets landing in Kremenchuk and Dnipro. Carnage was also seen in Zaporizhzhia and Kharkiv in the east. The world responded in horror as the strikes came thick and fast, killing at least 11 people in Kyiv as of Monday afternoon.

Ukrainian authorities told citizens across the country to seek shelter as the bombardment of rockets continued through the early hours.

The strikes were indiscriminate, targeting civilian infrastructure and residential buildings. Perhaps.

The most famous video footage of the attacks comes in the form of a video message that a Ukrainian teenage girl began recording as the strikes began. The girl can be seen walking and talking to the camera when a rocket lands just a short distance away from her. The flames and destruction caused by the rocket strike can be seen in the video as the young girl is thrown to the floor.

Strikes witnessed in downtown Kyiv showed the severity of the strikes, causing massive fireballs and smoke plumes from large buildings in the city center.

Playgrounds and residential buildings were left in states of total disrepair by Monday afternoon, when street cleaners emerged from their shelters and began cleaning up some of the mess caused by the strikes.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy recorded himself responding to the strikes while out in the street in Kyiv, telling viewers that Russia’s biggest ever drone and missile barrage was a sign that Russia knows the war in Ukraine is “hopeless.”

“They wanted to sow panic and chaos,” he said. “They are hopeless.”

Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba also responded to the attacks, accusing Putin of having only one trick up his sleeve; terror.

“Multiple Russian missile strikes across Ukraine. Putin’s only tactic is terror on peaceful Ukrainian cities, but he will not break Ukraine down. This is also his response to all appeasers who want to talk with him about peace: Putin is a terrorist who talks with missiles,” Kuleba said.

In a Telegram post, Kyiv Mayor Vitali Klitschko revealed that at least 45 residential buildings, five “objects of critical infrastructure and communal services,” three schools, two after-school clubs, one kindergarten, and five healthcare facilities were all damaged in Kyiv alone.

Why Putin Did It

Most of the drone and missile strikes that came in the early hours didn’t particularly aid the front line. The strikes have not allowed Russian soldiers to reverse the territorial losses seen in recent weeks, and have not stopped Ukrainian progress in the northeast and the southeast. Instead, the attacks appear to have been targeted at city centers and civilian infrastructure, including in some places that are not currently contested.

Strikes like these in central Kyiv have not been seen for several months, and the city is not presently occupied by Russian soldiers. So why did Putin do it?

There are at least three reasons why the Russian president could have launched these attacks, and we know one of them for sure. The Kremlin was responding to the recent car bomb attack on the Kerch bridge that connects Russia with the Crimean Peninsula.

In response to the Kerch bridge explosion, the Russian president said that there was no doubt it was a “terrorist attack aimed at destroying the critically important civilian infrastructure of the Russian Federation.” It’s important to recognize that the bridge was in use by the Russian military, allowing for important military equipment and supplies to be transported from Russia to the Crimean peninsula.

The Russian president reportedly told his security council that the strikes were “revenge” for Ukraine’s attacks on the bridge, and threatened to continue launching similar attacks if further “terrorist attacks” were carried out against Russia.

“If attempts to carry out terrorist attacks on our territory continue, Russia’s responses will be tough and will correspond in scale to the level of threats posed to Russia,” the Russian president said. “No one should have any doubts about this.”

Former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev also warned that the strikes were just the “first episode” of what’s to come for Ukraine in response to the bridge attack – a threat that seems to confirm another likely reason the Russian president authorized the strikes.

“The first episode has been played. There will be others,” Medvedev said on Monday.

Putin appears to be using the strikes as part of a campaign of fear, and an effort to scare Ukraine and NATO allies into stalling the recent and massive gains made by the Ukrainian military.

Through a combination of threats to use weapons of mass destruction, and a series of indiscriminate and unexpected attacks on major urban population centers, the Russian president seems to be hoping that a campaign of fear could be enough to offset his military’s weakness on the battlefield.

There could be a third reason why the Russian president chose to endorse these horrifying strikes on civilian infrastructure, too – and that’s to establish credibility for his threats to use nuclear weapons. In recent days, United States intelligence revealed that the Russian president has not yet made a decision to use nuclear weapons. The chances of using nuclear weapons, while elevated, also remain somewhat low given the consequences of launching such a strike on Ukraine or NATO territory.

Putin’s strikes on Ukraine on Sunday night and Monday morning, in hindsight, should have been expected. Russian forces continue retreating in many crucial territories in Ukraine, and the strike on Crimea’s Kerch bridge could have severely impacted Russia’s ability to supply its own troops not just in the Donbas, but also in occupied Crimea.

Ukraine Donbas

Russian tank firing. Image Credit: Creative Commons.

A loss not just in the Donbas but also in the Crimean peninsula would be catastrophic for Putin, an authoritarian leader who is, at this stage, literally fighting for his life and his political legacy.

Jack Buckby is a British author, counter-extremism researcher, and journalist based in New York. Reporting on the U.K., Europe, and the U.S., he works to analyze and understand left-wing and right-wing radicalization, and reports on Western governments’ approaches to the pressing issues of today. His books and research papers explore these themes and propose pragmatic solutions to our increasingly polarized society.

Written By

Jack Buckby is 19FortyFive's Breaking News Editor. He is a British author, counter-extremism researcher, and journalist based in New York. Reporting on the U.K., Europe, and the U.S., he works to analyze and understand left-wing and right-wing radicalization, and reports on Western governments’ approaches to the pressing issues of today. His books and research papers explore these themes and propose pragmatic solutions to our increasingly polarized society.

9 Comments

9 Comments

  1. Jacksonian Libertarian

    October 10, 2022 at 8:20 pm

    These attacks are for internal consumption to show Putin being ruthless, while achieving nothing on the battlefield. Terrorizing innocent Ukrainians is the act of a Dictator, and in no way changes the Ukrainians commitment to self-defense and attacking Russia. What are the Russian’s going to do? Invade them again, and fill graveyards with tortured, rapped, and murdered Kulaks? Been there, done that.

  2. Enfield

    October 11, 2022 at 4:27 am

    Major changes in the Red Giant’s military leadership will change warfare in the long run. It looks more in favor to military leaders who use massive bombing instead of being worn out on the ground.

    Interesting to see how NATO can respond to this. It can be very difficult in the long term for NATO commanders who have so far commanded AFU forces on the ground with some success.

    The AFU has thrown in everything they have, so it is not so strange that the leaders in the West are thoroughly shaken, almost in a panic at all levels.

  3. Vlad, the terrortist

    October 11, 2022 at 7:22 am

    Give Ukraine long range missiles to hit Moscow and nukes to use as a deterrent. Putin must die.

  4. Stefan Stackhouse

    October 11, 2022 at 9:28 am

    Russia’s military can’t fight against a real army, but they sure do know how to blow up apartment buildings and children’s playgrounds!

  5. Frank Blangeard

    October 11, 2022 at 10:02 am

    This was nothing compared to ‘Shock and Awe’ which the United States inflicted on Iraq. Russia is holding back in hopes of Ukraine coming to its senses. Russia should simply pull out all the stops and act like the U.S.

  6. Joe

    October 11, 2022 at 10:29 am

    1 – why is there a picture of a javelin anti-tank missile at the top of this article? Completely irrelevant to the story.

    2 – emphasis on school girls, schools, and playgrounds smacks of war propaganda. There is a war going on. Sometimes civilians get injured or killed. (You do know the Ukrainians fire into civilian areas of Donbas too, right?)

  7. Francis

    October 11, 2022 at 11:15 am

    I cannot speak for our NATO allies, but I hope current US forces never face a formidable adversary on the battlefield. Recently seeing hundreds of US soldiers on a base supposedly home to a “first line” unit, I was shocked to see that 40% are obese and many others overweight. Most of the many woman “soldiers” were especially heavy. Knowing the extreme challenges of arduous combat service, my confidence in their effectiveness is doubtful. God help the US taxpayer. What happened to the vaunted US military?

  8. Bertram

    October 11, 2022 at 3:29 pm

    Putin’s threat to attack civilian targets in Ukraine if any more attacks like the Kerch Bridge happen would carry more weight if Putin and Russia hadn’t been routinely attacking civilian targets in Ukraine since day 1 of their invasion.

  9. Ichabod Kunkleberry

    October 11, 2022 at 11:32 pm

    The Ukrainians may have the technology ( their “Neptune” missile, suitably enhanced or modified ) to launch a strike at Red Square in Moscow. One or two impacts of 400 lbs of explosive at 3 AM in Moscow ( to minimize casualties ) may be the detonator which explodes Putin’s regime.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Advertisement