Lauren Boebert Is a Special Kind of Stupid

Who died and made you, boss? Sir? Really! What gives you the right to call any person stupid? And, Bobbert speaks for lots of people. I guess I’m weird too because I carry a gun too. But I don’t carry it out in the open, mine is in my back pocket and no one can see it. And, I’m a Maga person so, that makes me bad or stupid. I don’t think so. And, Trump, just may not go to jail. Is he God, and knows all? I like Trump, I really think Trump, was treated very unfairly by the Democrats. But Biden has caused a lot of damage! And, because we are headed the wrong way. Mr. Kass needs to watch his mouth, he had no right to say some things about some of the people.

Saw the Leftist title, immediately checked to see if Harrison Kass was the author. Check. Review the article to see how far left and ad-hominem Kass has gone this time. People like Kass are beyond hope of ever achieving the journalistic ethics of about 2 generations ago. Kass is far to in-bred in the Leftist thought-jail to ever have a hope of thinking neutrally and rationally. To Kass, this article seems reasonable. Kass doesn’t realise that it evokes pity from people who experienced a more objective journalism decades ago. Kass’s writing is like bad breath – Kass doesn’t realise what he’s doing because his culture and circle of people he admires are all doing the same thing. This is how cultures like Nazi Germany and Bolshevik Russia were able to perpetuate for decades, people minnions in the system were so indoctrinated, like Kass, that they thought they were doing the right thing. It is likely that Kass sleeps well at night because his conscience has been conformed to Leftist thinkspeek. Kass, when you think of people too far gone to be of hope, check the mirror.

“There’s nothing in the Second Amendment about the right to extended magazines or bump stocks or pistol braces.”

This argument is a special kind of stupid. There’s nothing in the second amendment about pistols or rifles either. Just “arms.” The abolitionists defended themselves from pro-slavery democrats with privately owned cannons (see Cassius Clay, founder of Berea College). Nothing in the second amendment about cannons either.

“America does have a problem with gun violence ”

It’s stupid to not acknowledge that the gun violence problem is a blue zip code problem. The left has a gun violence problem, not America. America has a democrat problem. America especially has a democrat law enforcement problem. And because the left is aghast at the thought of protecting law abiding Americans from violent criminals, it’s the right and responsibility of Americans to secure their own liberty by protecting themselves from those criminal.

“right-wing fears that liberals are coming to take Americans guns away”

Would the left if they could? Yes. They will absolutely tell you so, and have for decades. This argument is a stupid brand of gaslighting that insists we ignore what we’ve all heard and seen.

“collapsed a block away from the restaurant and died from a methamphetamine overdose” is my favorite part since that one guy named George Floyd.

“Shall not be infringed.” Pretty cut-and-dried there. Regulating is infringing. She’s not my favorite, I don’t really like her. But “Shall not be infringed” is not confusing at all. Boebert isn’t a special kind of stupid. You are.

This article is a “special kind of stupid”.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The first 5 words create the context for the 2nd amendment. “WELL REGULATED” is what the “shall not be infringed” crowd like to conveniently leave out.

“WELL REGULATED”

No one is leaving them out. I’m sure you’ve heard this and are just pretending to not know it, but at the time of ratification, well regulated was understood to mean roughly well supplied. It does not mean restricted according to government whim.

Regardless, the rest of the amendment properly acknowledges that the right resides with the citizen: “the right of the people.” and was rooted in the history of english civil war and the British government’s efforts to disarm disfavored groups to protect their power.

Question, does the first amendment mention anything about social media or internet? No dummy so your point on extended mags etc in the second amendment is moot.

“Harrison joined the US Air Force as a Pilot Trainee but was medically discharged”

I’m a Rated Officer, first USAF and now ANG. You’re a piece of shit. It’s like saying ‘I joined but had asthma in BMT’ just to try to prove your credentials to online strangers.

Oh, your article is also dogshit.

Matt and F2000, Donnie is not being obtuse nor is he reading poorly, he’s just repeating or more likely regurgitating what he’s been indoctrinated to say by our current educational system.

With respect to “a well regulated militia”, SCOTUS ruled in Heller that the right to bear arms applies to individual citizens in everyday life so that argument is moot. But of course, liberals only like SCOTUS decisions when they work in their favor. Thus Roe was correct and just while Heller and Dobbs were illegitimate. See how that works?

Mr. Kass, your post is illogical and a special kind of stupid.

“Boebert claims that she obtained a concealed carry permit – and encouraged her restaurant servers to do the same – after a man was “‘beaten to death by another man’s hands…outside of [her] restaurant.’”

Representative Boebert did not claim that she obtained her permit AFTER the man died. She said, according to a quote by The Durango Herald, found in the Sept. 14, 2020, edition of The Colorado Sun, “I started carrying that day.” She also said, in another interview (ABC Nightline 7-22-14), that her waitresses asked if they could open carry, too.

There was a violent altercation in our back alley where a man was physically beaten to death and it immediately prompted the question, ‘How will I defend my people?’ So, I began to carry that day,” Boebert told the Durango Herald last year.

“The shooting death story sells better though […].”
Representative Boebert said, “he was beat [sic] to death by another man’s hands.” You quoted as much. So, what “shooting death story” are you talking about?

“What did happen was a man who had been involved in a fight somewhere in the vicinity of Boebert’s restaurant collapsed a block away from the restaurant and died from a methamphetamine overdose.”

So, a meth-head OD’ing around the block from Mrs. Boebert’s restaurant isn’t enough for her to worry about her safety and her waitstaff’s? By the way, it was initially investigated as an homicide by LEO. Do you know that Mrs. Boebert read about the autopsy? Maybe she only heard about the incident people in town? That would explain why her statement is off.

“It doesn’t help to explain why Boebert opened a gun-themed restaurant before the incident occurred.”
Maybe because it’s in a town called RIFLE, Colorado, Einstein?
You gun-grabbers are all the same.

To those who are dumb enough to listen to liberal talking points on the 2A, here is how James Madison introduced the right to keep and bear arms, in his list of amendments to the Constitution, on the Floor of the U.S. House, 8 June, 1789:

Fourthly, That in article 1st, section 9, between clauses 3 and 4, be inserted these clauses, to wit:

[…]

The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed; a well armed and well regulated militia being the best security of a free country; but no person religiously scrupulous of bearing arms shall be compelled to render military service in person.

This shows that the “militia” part was only a statement of fact, but did not prohibit people from being religious, conscientious objectors to bearing arms in the militia. The wording was changed in the final article of amendment, but it doesn’t change the fact that the right is an individual right.

Also, the power to “regulate” the militia was/is given to Congress, not the States, as is clear in Article I, Section 8, Clause 16:

To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress; […].

Everyone back then knew what “the right of the people” meant. It is only today’s morons, educated by public school curricula, who have trouble figuring this out.
Lord have mercy on this great nation.

“Yeah, that never happened.

What did happen was a man who had been involved in a fight somewhere in the vicinity of Boebert’s restaurant collapsed a block away from the restaurant and died from a methamphetamine overdose. The shooting death story sells better though”

What shooting death story? She straight up said the man was BEATEN to death, which he was. Can you not even read your own article?? The man was savagely beaten and then dropped dead a block away. Are you implying that George Floyd also died from a drug overdose and not from a physical assault?