Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Smart Bombs: Military, Defense and National Security

SR-71 Blackbird ‘Bomber’: What The Air Force Could Have Built

SR-71 Blackbird.
SR-71 Blackbird.

Key Points and Summary: The SR-71 Blackbird, retired in 1997, remains an unparalleled marvel in aviation history, capable of speeds up to Mach 3.2 and altitudes of 85,000 feet.

-Designed as a reconnaissance aircraft, it was deemed too costly and redundant, with some arguing the U-2 spy plane could perform similar missions.

-However, its speed and altitude rendered it nearly untouchable by radar and air defenses, sparking debates about its potential as a stealth bomber.

-Could it have been a paradigm-changing platform with advanced weapon systems?

-While its successor, the SR-72, may achieve hypersonic speeds, the Blackbird’s legacy endures as a high-tech icon.

Could the SR-71 Blackbird Have Been a Game-Changing Bomber?

Stealthy, high-altitude, and faster than any existing aircraft are all accurate ways to describe the famous SR-71 Blackbird, a high-speed reconnaissance plane that may have been ahead of its time. 

How can the fastest aircraft on earth now sit in a museum after being cancelled in 1997? The SR-71 Blackbird showed it could reach unprecedented and, as of yet, unrivaled speeds of Mach 3.2 and equally defining breakthrough altitudes of 85,000 feet.

The now emerging and potentially hypersonic SR-72 “Son of Blackbird” may prove faster than its predecessor, yet that aircraft may not fully exist until 2030—if the mysterious platform exists. 

The aircraft, which served in Vietnam and then again in the Middle East in 1993, was canceled a few years later for high costs and redundancy during the Clinton administration; detractors at the time said the existing and equally famous 1950s and 1960s-era U2 spy plane could perform the missions performed by the SR-71.

In subsequent years, many military weapons developers and leaders in Congress came to lament this decision, and the 1990s dot.com boom Clinton years became known years later as a military “procurement holiday,” which some believe set back the military many years

SR-71 Bomber? 

In retrospect, one cannot help but wonder whether the speed and altitude of the SR-71 would have made for a paradigm-changing bomber platform.

That seems entirely possible, given the “stealth” properties of the aircraft and its altitude and speed. Should the aircraft have been engineered with advanced command and control and perhaps an internal weapons bay, if not pylons or hard points, it may have involved a “leap-ahead” technology for the US Air Force searching to maintain its air supremacy during and after the Cold War.

Perhaps it could have provided a bomber platform undetected by Soviet air defenses. 

SR-71. SR-71 photo taken at the National Air and Space Museum. Taken by 19FortyFive on 10/1/2022.

SR-71. SR-71 photo taken at the National Air and Space Museum. Taken by 19FortyFive on 10/1/2022.

Even if adding hard points decreased the stealth properties of the aircraft by increasing its radar signature, the SR-71 is known for being “unable” to be hit due to its breakthrough “speed” and “altitude,” according to an article in The National Interest by Maya Carlin. 

“Its engine intakes included sophisticated mechanisms to slow the air below the speed of sound before it entered the engines, and many of its components were made from titanium or a titanium alloy to withstand the intense heat generated by its high speeds,” Carlin writes in a 2025 essay. 

Bombing at Speed an Altitude? 

Should its speed, altitude, and other technologies make the aircraft unable to be hit, it could have functioned as a bomber with or without an internal weapons bay. Due to the fact it carried some protruding structures and angled external configurations, it seems the SR-71 may not have been as “stealthy” as perhaps a more modern B-2.

Yet the aircraft does feature a sleek, blended wing body formation, which, if combined with unmatched speed and altitude, could make the aircraft nearly impossible to hit. 

Too Fast to Hit

An aircraft traveling at Mach 3.2 might travel so quickly from one radar aperture to another that a ground-based radar system may be unable to establish a continuous track or “lock” on the aircraft. Also, it may have simply flown too high for ground-based air defenses to “see” or “target.”

SR-71 Spy Plane. Image Credit: Creative Commons.

SR-71 Spy Plane. Image Credit: Creative Commons.

Given this, why wasn’t the SR-71 turned into a bomber? There may be a mix of variables, including cost considerations or bombing complications. Were there bombs at this time capable of dropping from 85,000 feet?

Were they engineered to attack from those altitudes and maintain target precision? Perhaps the high-altitude SR-71 surveillance showed great promise as a reconnaissance platform but would have lost speed if loaded up with bombs or simply been unable to bomb from its unparalleled altitudes. 

About the Author: Kris Osborn 

Kris Osborn is the Military Technology Editor of 19FortyFive and President of Warrior Maven – Center for Military Modernization. Osborn previously served at the Pentagon as a highly qualified expert in the Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army—Acquisition, Logistics & Technology. Osborn has also worked as an anchor and on-air military specialist at national TV networks. He has appeared as a guest military expert on Fox News, MSNBC, The Military Channel, and The History Channel. He also has a Masters Degree in Comparative Literature from Columbia University.

Written By

Kris Osborn is the Military Affairs Editor of 19 FortyFive and President of Warrior Maven - Center for Military Modernization. Osborn previously served at the Pentagon as a Highly Qualified Expert with the Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army—Acquisition, Logistics & Technology. Osborn has also worked as an anchor and on-air military specialist at national TV networks. He has appeared as a guest military expert on Fox News, MSNBC, The Military Channel, and The History Channel. He also has a Masters Degree in Comparative Literature from Columbia University.

3 Comments

3 Comments

  1. B

    January 15, 2025 at 3:53 am

    You’re retarded consider the weight alone of any worthwhile bomb that we currently make as well as overall dimensions. There’s no place to put an internal Bay considering the skin temperature at that speed. There’s no way ordinance would put up with that for very long. So yeah you take it up that fast if it can get that fast with the extra weight and it blows up anyways for crying out loud. You sound like a child

  2. Piss off

    January 16, 2025 at 3:14 pm

    This is the worst article I’ve ever been clickbaited into reading. If this isn’t computer-generated and actually written by a person, you should find another vocation.

  3. eric jarnagin

    January 16, 2025 at 5:59 pm

    We did have a high speed bomber called the XB-70 Valkyrie , although it never saw service

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Advertisement