Key Points and Summary: The Royal Canadian Air Force (RCAF) faces crippling recruitment and retention problems, aging fleets, slow procurement, and infrastructure shortfalls.
-Its Cold War–era CF-18 jets are overdue for replacement; meanwhile, essential airlift and maritime patrol platforms are also lagging behind modern needs.
-The housing crisis at bases like Cold Lake undermines morale, while underfunded training programs fall short of preparing personnel for multi-domain, high-tech threats.
-Urgent solutions include competitive pay, off-the-shelf aircraft acquisitions, streamlined procurement reform, and expanded Arctic surveillance capabilities.
-Without bold political will and sustained funding, the RCAF risks irrelevance in an era marked by intensifying great-power competition.
Canada’s Aging CF-18 Fleet Signals Crisis for the RCAF
The Royal Canadian Air Force (RCAF), once a symbol of national pride and capability, is now grappling with profound challenges that jeopardize its ability to defend Canada and contribute meaningfully to allied operations. Persistent recruitment and retention shortfalls, aging fleets, procurement dysfunction, and infrastructure deficiencies have left the Air Force struggling to meet its operational commitments in an increasingly contested global environment. Without bold and sustained reform, the RCAF risks losing its relevance as a critical pillar of Canada’s defense.
The RCAF’s recruitment and retention crisis is one of its most urgent challenges. Chronic personnel shortages have left critical roles unfilled, with some estimates suggesting a shortfall of thousands of aircrew and support staff. Fighter squadrons, air transport units, and even search-and-rescue teams are forced to operate understrength, undermining readiness and morale. Many members cite burnout, family strain due to high operational tempo, and inadequate support for relocation as reasons for leaving. Retention issues are particularly acute among pilots, who can find far better pay and working conditions in the private sector.
Housing and infrastructure exacerbate these problems. At major bases such as Cold Lake and Trenton, aircrew and their families struggle with rising rents and inadequate on-base housing. The situation in Cold Lake, a remote location critical to Canada’s NORAD commitments, is especially dire. Housing shortages and poor community support have made it difficult to attract and retain personnel, compounding the strain on already overburdened units.
Recruitment has failed to keep pace with these losses. Younger Canadians often view the military as an unappealing career choice, perceiving it as outdated and poorly aligned with modern aspirations. While other nations, such as the United States and Australia, have adapted their recruitment strategies to emphasize high-tech career paths, adventure, and patriotism, Canada’s messaging is inconsistent and uninspiring. The RCAF’s critical role in defending Canadian sovereignty, from patrolling the Arctic to contributing to NORAD and NATO, is rarely highlighted effectively in recruitment campaigns.
Compounding the personnel crisis is the Air Force’s aging fleet. The CF-18 fighter jets, introduced in the 1980s, remain the backbone of Canada’s air defense, despite being well past their prime. Efforts to replace them with the F-35 have been delayed for years, with initial deliveries not expected until the late 2020s. Until then, Canada must rely on upgraded but aging CF-18s to fulfill its NORAD and NATO commitments, a stopgap solution that leaves gaps in capability. In the event of a high-intensity conflict, these aircraft would be outmatched by adversaries with fifth-generation fighters, advanced drones, and integrated air defense systems.
The transport fleet fares no better. Aging Hercules and Polaris aircraft struggle to meet Canada’s airlift and refueling needs, while newer acquisitions, such as the CC-295 for search and rescue, have faced significant delays and operational setbacks. These shortcomings leave Canada reliant on allies to fill critical gaps, undermining its sovereignty and credibility in coalition operations.
The Arctic, a region of growing strategic importance, highlights the RCAF’s limitations. As climate change accelerates and geopolitical competition in the region intensifies, Canada’s ability to monitor and defend its vast northern territory is increasingly in question. The Air Force’s fleet of CP-140 Aurora maritime patrol aircraft, while capable, is aging and insufficient to cover the immense area. Investments in modern surveillance platforms, long-endurance drones, and Arctic-capable infrastructure have been slow, leaving Canada at risk of ceding ground to competitors like Russia and China.
Underlying these capability gaps is Canada’s notoriously dysfunctional procurement system. Delays, cost overruns, and bureaucratic infighting have plagued major projects, from the F-35 acquisition to the replacement of search-and-rescue aircraft. Unlike allies who have streamlined their procurement processes to adapt to modern threats, Canada’s approach remains slow and inefficient. The result is a patchwork of aging platforms and delayed replacements that struggle to meet operational demands.
Infrastructure deficiencies further erode the RCAF’s readiness. Key bases lack modern facilities to support new aircraft or accommodate expanding missions. Cold Lake, for example, has outdated hangars ill-suited to house advanced fighter jets, while northern airfields critical for Arctic operations remain underdeveloped. These gaps not only hinder readiness but also send a troubling message about Canada’s commitment to defending its sovereignty and fulfilling its international obligations.
The RCAF’s training programs are similarly outdated. Modern air warfare increasingly relies on integrated multi-domain operations involving advanced technologies such as cyber capabilities, artificial intelligence, and unmanned systems. Yet the RCAF has struggled to keep pace, with training programs often focused on traditional air-to-air and air-to-ground tactics. While exercises like Maple Flag offer valuable experience, they fall short of preparing personnel for the complexities of contemporary conflict.
Strategically, the RCAF suffers from a lack of focus. Resources are stretched thin across multiple missions, from NORAD air defense to NATO deployments in Europe and humanitarian operations around the globe. While these missions are all important, Canada’s limited resources demand prioritization. A more focused strategy emphasizing Arctic sovereignty and continental defense would better align with Canada’s core security interests.
Addressing the RCAF’s challenges requires urgent and comprehensive reform. Recruitment and retention must be top priorities, with competitive pay, improved housing, and family support programs as immediate steps. Modernizing recruitment campaigns to emphasize the Air Force’s cutting-edge roles in technology, defense, and environmental monitoring would help attract the next generation of aircrew and technicians.
Procurement reform is equally critical. Streamlining acquisition processes, leveraging allied expertise, and prioritizing off-the-shelf solutions where possible are essential to delivering new capabilities on time and within budget. Investments in Arctic-capable platforms, drones, and advanced surveillance systems must be accelerated to address the growing threats in Canada’s north.
Infrastructure upgrades are non-negotiable. Modernizing hangars, airfields, and base housing is essential to supporting operations and improving quality of life for personnel. At Cold Lake, in particular, significant investments are needed to ensure the base can sustain high-tempo operations in a strategically vital region.
Above all, political will is essential. The Trudeau government has shown little urgency in addressing the RCAF’s challenges, favoring symbolic gestures over substantive action. A future Conservative government under Pierre Poilievre could bring the focus and commitment necessary to revitalize the Air Force, but success will require sustained investment and prioritization of defense policy.
The stakes are high. A diminished Air Force not only leaves Canada vulnerable but also erodes its credibility with allies. NORAD, NATO, and other partners rely on Canada to contribute meaningfully to collective defense, yet the RCAF’s current state leaves it punching below its weight. As geopolitical competition intensifies in the Arctic and beyond, Canada cannot afford to fall further behind.
The Royal Canadian Air Force’s legacy is one of excellence, from its heroic contributions in the Battle of Britain to its role in peacekeeping and disaster relief. Restoring its strength and relevance will not be easy, but it is essential. Canada must act now to ensure the RCAF can meet the challenges of the 21st century and continue to protect the nation’s skies and sovereignty.
About the Author: Andrew Latham
Andrew Latham is a Professor of International Relations and Political Theory; and Special Advisor to the President of Macalester College, Saint Paul, MN. He is also a Non-Resident Fellow, Defense Priorities, Washington, DC; a Senior Washington Fellow with the Institute for Peace and Diplomacy also in Washington, DC; a 2023-25 Education Ambassador with the Council on Foreign Relations; an Opinion Contributor with The Hill in Washington, DC; and an Opinion Contributor with RealClearDefense.
NewYear2025
January 4, 2025 at 11:16 am
Hmm, there was an incident last year which involved the RCAF that somehow proves the canadian air force is fully alive and well.
And also fully well-fed & well-fueled.
That incident was one among a series of ‘similar-type pattern’ kind of incidents.
In late october 2023, a canadian aircraft brazenly swerved into chinese air-space over the paracel islands and was intercepted.
That incident brought out a speedy and loud squeal of indignant protest from ottawa, but was blasted right away by the chinese as full of self-righteous malice.
The canadians were seemingly participating in US – led enforcement of sanctions against trading with north korea.
And ottawa was always confident the chinese were secretly trading with north korea. Hence the reckless provocation.
The canadian fliers were just full of it.
They ignored repeated warnings and actually tried to engage the chinese in a risky series of manuevers by flying very low over the islands.
That happened becuz the canadian fliers knew they wouldn’t be shot down or rammed even though they were violating someone else air-space.
Bandicoot
January 5, 2025 at 2:09 am
Andrew Latham needs to learn some new adjectives other than “Rotting Away” for his headlines.
It’s also telling that he keeps pushing Pierre Polievre as the saviour of the Canadian Forces when:
A) He has publicly stated he will not fund the CAF to 2% of GDP and has no plan to do so.
B) Back when the conservatives were last in charge, they spent LESS on defence both in actual dollars and as a % of GDP than the current liberals,even though we were actively fighting in Afghanistan and then Iraq during their tenure
Your articles appear to be foreign meddling leading up to an election instead of well researched pieces.
You and 19fortyfive should do better.
Nomura
January 5, 2025 at 2:10 am
No “PROBLEM” at all… As for canada this year will becoming the “52nd states” of the murican. “HEIL FUHRER DONALD TRUCK…”
🤭🤭🤣🤣🤣
Peter Foran
January 5, 2025 at 12:35 pm
Sadly must agree.
How about we contract out defence of North America to the US?
Mak Kinsey
January 5, 2025 at 5:11 pm
Many years ago when the Canadian Army took control of the Canadian Forces they rewrote the War Manual which until then had described the role of the Air force very well. They wrote” An airplane is merely an extension of Artillery therefore an Airplane Pilot is the equivalent of a Tank Driver.”At the time I was flying the CF101 at altitudes of 50000ft and had difficulty which bit of the Artillery I was supposed to be part of. I dont think the Air Force is rotting way but i do believe that the Army is trying to destroy it.
George Skulsky
January 5, 2025 at 6:35 pm
Once Proud but to more , our forces including the RCAF are underfunded & dependant on the US . A Sad scene ..
Spuwho
January 6, 2025 at 7:37 am
Any country that doesn’t fall in line with the “analysts” is deemed inadequate. 1945 editorial obsession with the recent purchase of the F-15EX by both US and Israel and the FA-18 Block 3 by the USN as wasteful and substandard exposes your iPhone like thinking when it comes to defense.
When a nation can create superior warfare tools but can’t afford to make enough of them to survive a war, they will lose. Period.
So now we come to a country that has made commitments to upgrade it’s current fleet plus acquire more from a friendly nation even though they are in debt and the headline calls it rotting away. Just because they have yet to drink the LockMart kool-aid doesn’t make them deficient (yet).
Charles W Baughman
January 6, 2025 at 11:32 am
I was at Maple Flag back in the late 70s. Cold Lake lived up to it’s name. The Canadian government should think more of protection of their huge land area. I hope you are enjoying the exodus of liberals to your country.
Gloria Wright McGregor
January 6, 2025 at 3:21 pm
You have no privy into the Canadian Armed Forces and matters surrounding any branch of the CAF.
What gives you, as an ordinary American, any inside knowledge into matters which MOST Canadians have no insight? Your PERSONAL opinions are most certainly lacking “factual knowledge”. This is not something that ordinary Canadian citizens “know” and is left to the “very powers that be” in the military, as you should certainly know and acknowledge.
You should really keep your “facts” to what you actually “KNOW”.
Dude
January 13, 2025 at 6:32 pm
This article completely neglects to mention the 800 pound Gorilla in the room. That is, the woke culture that has taken over Canada and its armed forces. They’re traditional recruiting pool simply doesn’t want to serve anymore because they’re mistreated and the so called new canadians, I have little interest.
Talon01
January 14, 2025 at 7:44 am
@Dude – woke culture isn’t stopping recruiting. The CAF had 10x the number of applications last year compared to how many we could recruit and train. Can I get the years you served in the forces? I’m at 18 years and can tell you it’s not an issue.
And for Andrew – why do you keep republishing the same story? It says published 11 hours ago but there are comments on here from over a week ago.
Alicia
January 14, 2025 at 12:18 pm
Canada as a Peece Keeping Country shines as no other.
Keep it that way, and invest in Education, Health and the like.
Strong in these fields, will stand in front of any enemy, adversary/ies rather.
Bandicoot
January 14, 2025 at 9:49 pm
Ha!
After being called out for having three articles with “rotting away” in the headlines now they all say “falling apart” and were republished 1 day ago as “new” articles.
This is a load of tripe.
The RCAF is getting new jets, new SAR aircraft, upgraded SAR and Griffon Helos, just got new MH helicopters, is buying the P8, has new MRTT tankers, is buying upgraded Reaper UAVs and has relatively new C17s and J model hercs. We’re also buying new Training airplanes to increase our pilot production throughout.
There is no fleet that hasn’t gotten a major upgrade since 2015.
Our issue is personnel retention. We spend loads of money and lots of time training people and then let them walk out the door because we won’t pay them 15% more.
James
January 15, 2025 at 8:16 am
Considering all his articles, I am starting to see a trend. I think Andrew Latham is actually an AI bot.
Feel free to challenge me on this point.