Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Uncategorized

The Air Force Isn’t Ready for What Is Coming

B-2 Spirit
A B-2 Spirit prepares to take-off from Nellis Air Force Base, Nev. during Bamboo Eagle, Jan. 29, 2024. Bamboo Eagle provides Airmen, allies, and partners with a multidimensional, combat-representative battle-space to conduct advanced training in support of U.S. national interests. (U.S. Air Force photo by Senior Airman Bryson Britt)

Article Summary and Key Points: China’s naval dominance, with over 700 combat-capable ships, significantly outnumbers America’s roughly 300 vessels. To counter this disadvantage without overspending on expensive anti-ship missiles, the U.S. Air Force Research Lab developed “Quicksink,” a cost-effective anti-ship munition derived from existing JDAM guidance kits.

-Quicksink transforms low-cost gravity bombs into precision-guided ship-killers by adding radar and infrared sensors, accurately striking below the waterline to maximize damage.

-At approximately $70,000 to $250,000 per unit—far cheaper than standard anti-ship missiles—Quicksink can decisively neutralize large enemy warships at scale, potentially shifting the naval balance in America’s favor without overwhelming defense budgets.

Quicksink: America’s Game-Changing Weapon Against China’s Massive Navy

China now employs the largest surface fleet of combat-capable vessels on the planet with a total strength of 700 large-hulled ships between its navy, militarized coast guard, and maritime militia.

And while the U.S. Navy does bring more gross tonnage to bear than the aggressive Pacific state, its overall fleet strength is only around 300 ships and in the event of a conflict in the Pacific far fewer ships could without leaving other American or allied interests unprotected. 

This poses a number of big problems for American forces, as the anti-ship missiles employed by surface warships range in price tend to cost anywhere from $2 million to $4 million a piece, and more importantly, are difficult to reload while at sea (though the Navy is working to address this issue).

Other highly capable anti-ship weapons, like the LRASM, are even pricier — at roughly $3.2 million a shot. There are certainly circumstances that justify the high price of these weapons, but at scale, the U.S. runs the risk of losing a war of financial attrition by relying solely on these budget-busting missiles to take on China’s Navy

The United States needs a highly effective, but lower-cost means of engaging large surface combatants to be able to overcome this numerical disadvantage. And that’s exactly what the Air Force Research Lab had in mind when it fielded Quicksink; a novel weapon made up of existing hardware simply assembled and leveraged in a new and highly effective way. 

Quicksink is really little more than good old fashioned JDAM (Joint Direct Attack Munition) modified specifically for anti-ship warfare. JDAMs are GPS-assisted inertial navigation guidance kits that can be mounted directly onto the sort of low-cost unguided gravity bombs the U.S. has maintained large stockpiles of since the Cold War, effectively turning these “dumb” bombs into precision-guided ordnance. 

Quicksink builds upon the JDAM’s capabilities by incorporating additional forms of guidance into the bolt-on kit; namely a radar seeker in the nose and an infrared imaging seeker installed in a new side fairing.

As a result, while JDAMs are limited to striking stationary targets at set coordinates, Quicksink uses the JDAM guidance kits only to get into the general vicinity of a known target ship before transitioning over to its radar and infrared sensors to identify the target vessel, calculate its course and rate of travel, and plot its terminal guidance to a specific point alongside the hull of the vessel just below the waterline. 

This degree of precision makes the otherwise unguided BLU-109 dumb bomb into such a potent ship-killer that its destructive capabilities have been compared directly to the most deadly anti-ship weapons in service, heavy torpedoes like the U.S. Navy’s Mk. 48.

And like any JDAM, it can be dropped from as far as 15 miles out from aircraft like the B-2 Spirit, making it all but impossible for local air defenses to engage the dropping aircraft.

In the future, the weapon could also be carried internally by stealth fighters like the carrier-based F-35C. 

The Air Force Research Lab believes Quicksink kits, which currently cost roughly $200,000 each to procure, will drop in price to roughly $50,000 each when serial production begins, but even if it doesn’t, the BLU-109 bomb it rides on rings in at only around $20,000 — making this a weapon that could range in price from roughly $70,000 to maybe as much as $250,000 with the capacity to sink even very large warships with a single strike. 

And, if this concept does continue to mature, it’s potentially feasible to see a Quickstrike-ER roll out down the road, incorporating the JDAM-ER’s deployable glide wings to extend the reach of this budget-busting ship killer out to 45 miles or more. 

About the Author: Alex Hollings, Defense Expert 

Alex Hollings is the editor of the Sandboxx blog and a former U.S. Marine that writes about defense policy and technology. He lives with his wife and daughter in Georgia.

Written By

Alex Hollings is a writer, dad, and Marine veteran who specializes in foreign policy and defense technology analysis. He holds a master’s degree in Communications from Southern New Hampshire University, as well as a bachelor’s degree in Corporate and Organizational Communications from Framingham State University. 

9 Comments

9 Comments

  1. Jim

    March 9, 2025 at 2:55 pm

    This is a striking technological advance… without being super-high tech.

    And, inexpensive.

    We need more of these types of technology because quantity has a quality all its own in the heat of battle.

    Good to hear common sense is being applied to defense issues: repurpose existing technology and apply relatively simple tech additions to that existing technology to make it more effective in different environments, on land with fixed targets, and at sea with moving targets.

    Nice.

  2. Krystalcane

    March 10, 2025 at 3:04 am

    Is it being sold out to a Russian agent was down our president?

  3. warren trout

    March 12, 2025 at 12:45 am

    The title seems inappropriate. It looks like the AF is ready for the future.

  4. Cornelius Howard

    March 12, 2025 at 3:24 am

    Whatever ya’ll allows for the President or DOGE just make sure ya’ll protect the citizens of the United States against all enemies b I think foreign or domestic. Make sure you get President to increase the printing money machine to have when available all monies each Militaries stand in need of from all the monies collected by way of firings, businesses closers,lawsuits, and whatever. Today we look not ready for anything.

  5. Brett

    March 12, 2025 at 8:20 am

    So what the hell is the USAF not ready for Alex?

    So much for “expertise” in journalism. Just write something up with an eye catching title and get paid because someone will print anything.

    If you write it, they’ll read it. Right?

  6. Deabo65

    March 12, 2025 at 10:59 am

    Trump is hell bent on getting into bed with Putin and will sell its allies in Europe out to the Russian Hitler, he’s not looking East and the rise of China.
    Now where has this scenario played out before? Oh yes 1943!!
    History repeats itself, it has to no-one listens!!
    I was pro-America, not any more..

  7. Keith Breedlove

    March 12, 2025 at 6:03 pm

    Can the bomb be acquired and targeted? Can it s various sensors/seekers be acquired and targeted/blinded. Is any of its fusing susceptible to directed emp or high power microwaves? Each weapon development engenders its own counter-weapons.

  8. James K Webster

    March 13, 2025 at 6:51 pm

    In the first place the fighter needs to find its target while its a target. Missile technology is pin point accurate dam Iranians proved that when BB attacked Iran and hardly anything got through out of 100 fighters so much for f35 stealth. So a fighter is going to be dodging other fighters not to mention naval missiles. Its not like China plans to go deep out there so also main land china likely fire missiles too. I doubt China will invade anyone. One thing is clear you cant trust the U.S. Kissinger said it best;” to be our enemy is dangerous to be our friend is deadly”.

  9. Jason

    March 13, 2025 at 9:36 pm

    Alot of these writers don’t realize is China counts every ship and boat towards their fleet…this includes wooden boats and small rescue boats pretty much anything that floats….and this writer needs to be fact checked because he just throws out numbers and misleads readers

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Advertisement