Defense giant Lockheed Martin is proposing a new F-35 Lightning II fighter jet variant. The yet-unnamed fighter would combine some of the capabilities of the upcoming F-47 fighter jet with the already successful F-35 platform.
How this proposed “new” fighter would fit in with existing air forces, including the US Air Force, remains to be seen.
Lockheed Martin Proposes a “Supercharged F-35”: Meet the F-35D
In March 2025, the United States Air Force announced defense contractor Boeing had won the Next Generation Air Dominance fighter contract. Boeing beat Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman to develop and manufacture the new fighter, designated F-47. The F-47 will be the first new fighter for Boeing in decades. Competitor Lockheed Martin dropped from the three-way race by the Air Force for not meeting program requirements, has said it will not contest the decision.
Instead, Lockheed Martin announced the company will develop a “fifth-generation plus” version of the F-35, which incorporates technology designed for future versions of the F-35 and NGAD into the existing airframe. According to Breaking Defense, Lockheed CEO Jim Taiclet told the press during a quarterly earnings call, “We’re basically going to take the [F-35] chassis and turn it into a Ferrari,” Taiclet said. “It’s like a NASCAR upgrade, so to speak, where we would take the F-35 [and] apply some of those co-funded technologies both from NGAD and the F-35 program.”
According to Taiclet, the goal is to develop a version of the F-35 that has eighty percent of the capability of the F-47 but at just fifty percent of the price. Lockheed Martin reportedly tested and flew a prototype NGAD aircraft before it was disqualified.
The CEO stated that there were “materials,” “geometries,” “countermeasures for stealth,” and new weapons and tracking systems. Taiclet also said his engineers were sure his vision of an F-35 on steroids was doable.
The F-35 is an evolving program, with decades of upgrades already planned for the worldwide fleet of fighters. The latest upgrade, Block 4, will be paired with a computer hardware and software upgrade, Tech Refresh 3, without which many new capabilities won’t be possible. Block 4, which is finally hitting air forces worldwide, includes “over 75 major upgrades” for all three F-35 versions, including updates to the jet’s electronic warfare system, sensor upgrades, the ability to carry new and more weapons, advanced networking capabilities, and an unknown number of classified capabilities. The features set for Block 4 have been in place for several years now, likely before Lockheed Martin’s NGAD prototype took flight, leaving open the possibility that new technologies that aren’t in Block 4 made it to NGAD.
What Makes the F-35D Special
This “new” aircraft—we’ll call it F-35D for now—would likely feature ninety percent internal changes. The F-35’s stealthiness is in large part due to its shape. Taiclet himself implied there would be little to no changes in the outward design when he stated the company would take the F-35 chassis “and turn it into a Ferrari.” Even minor changes could have major implications for the aircraft’s radar signature, making it detectable by radar at greater distances.
In other words, almost all new technology would have to fit under the aircraft’s skin. The F-35 is already jam-packed so that most new tech would displace existing equipment. In most cases, that would probably be an improvement of existing capabilities. A new laser weapon might replace the 25mm GAU-22/A Gatling gun system built into the -A model’s fuselage and carried in an external pod on the -B and -C versions. It might even mean downgrading or eliminating existing capabilities to make room for new ones, with the Gatling gun swapped entirely for something else.

Stealth F-35C. Image Credit: Creative Commons.
All of this leads to the question: how does the F-35D fit into the US Air Force and other allied air forces’ fighter plans? After Block 4, the worldwide F-35 fleet will eventually be fitted out with Block 5, which will further update the fighter, and probably a Block 6.
Part F-35, Part NGAD
This variant will include plenty of opportunities to introduce NGAD tech into the fleet, and the F-35 will mature into a “fifth-generation-plus” fighter on its own. This suggests that the F-35D will chart a different course, one that emphasizes air-to-air over the current criteria to perform both air-to-air and air-to-ground missions. An example of an F-35D might be based on the -C model, with its additional range and increased fuel capacity via a podded fuel tank, replacing the podded gun.
The F-35D appears positioned as a spoiler aircraft that could be offered as an alternative to the F-47 if the new fighter encounters delays and cost overruns. If that were the case, Lockheed Martin could offer to step in and build the F-35D. Boeing took a similar tack with the F-15EX Eagle II, a new version of the half-century-old F-15 with many modern sensors, avionics, and weapons on par with the F-35. The F-15EX was introduced in a period of prolonged turmoil for the F-35 program.

F-15EX Eagle II. Image Credit: Creative Commons.
While it was not a direct replacement as a “new” aircraft with a proven record, it received favorable attention. The Air Force plans to buy between 98 and 144 F-15EXs, a decision that surprised defense watchers and no doubt sapped F-35 procurement. If the UK-Italy-Japan Global Combat Air Programme, or GCAP for short, fails to produce an airplane, the F-35D could be an alternative for all three countries, especially since they all already fly the F-35.
Could This Stealth Fighter Fly?
There’s no guarantee that a F-35D would rack up orders, especially as the Navy and the Air Force concentrate on their own NGAD programs. As for exports, the Made in USA brand is taking a serious hit overseas as the Trump Administration bashes allies and tarnishes America’s reputation as a stable partner.
However, there seems to be little downside for Lockheed Martin to take the risk, especially since between the two NGAD programs and the F-35, there are unlikely to be new American fighters until at least the 2050s.
This is a period of political change unprecedented in the postwar period, and while it might not be a place for the F-35D now, at the rate the world is changing, there might be in five years.
About the Author: Kyle Mizokami
A 19FortyFive Contributing Editor, Kyle Mizokami, is a defense and national-security writer based in San Francisco. His work has appeared in Popular Mechanics, Esquire, The National Interest, Car and Driver, Men’s Health, and many others. He is the founder and editor for the blogs Japan Security Watch, Asia Security Watch and War Is Boring.

waco
April 25, 2025 at 2:22 pm
F-35D would be a ‘throwback’ to the days of the famous vietnam war.
During the nam war, the F-105D was the workhorse of the USAF.
F-105Ds based in thailand regularly sortied over hanoi and haiphong and the red river delta.
Naturally they tangled a lot of times with MiG fighters and not always coming out with positive results from their engagements.
So, will the F-35D do any better. Unlikely.
404NotFound
April 25, 2025 at 3:51 pm
Will the F-35D be a rehash of the F-21 saga.
Right now, today, april 2025, war clouds are gathering over the indo-pak frontier.
Due to an incident at pahalgam in kashmir, on tuesday, Indian and pakistani troops are firing at each other.
In 2019, near balakot, the two sides exchanged blows (or strikes) and MiGs and sukhois allegedly clashed with F-16s and JF-17s.
At least one MiG was shot down. Later, lockheed proposed the F-21 for IAF as the ideal replacement for MiGs.
But IAF wasn’t keen on F-21.
To them, the proposed F-21 was just a remake of the fighting falcon.
So, will the DoD be keen on the F-35D. Same as IAF. not keen. Not keen at all.
Nathan
April 26, 2025 at 5:26 am
I don’t think our American cousins quite realise the change in sentiment amongst it’s allies with a newly found resolve to decouple from the USA to some degree and Make their Respective Countries Great Again.
President Trump may be able to turn the US’ fortunes around by bringing manufacturing home, but now everyone will want to do the same thing and since we have been both commanded by Trump to take defence more seriously and face the real threat of a USA that could simply pull out of international treaties the imperative to revitalise domestic industry is greater than ever. I think it far more likely now that GCAP get new partners possibly Australia or Canada than for the partner countries to dissipate and tie themselves into the US supply chain. There maybe some juggling of partners amongst FCAS and GCAP but I’m convinced both will now go ahead. What’s the alternative an 80pc F47 with a kill switch or an F35D with a kill switch… both of which 90pc benefit US industry not their own.
Dave
April 26, 2025 at 10:19 pm
Europe and US will not “decouple’ over any one president. This is what makes Democracy great. We can elect anyone. As long as we stay democracy’s we are fine and our ties run far deeper than you seem aware of.
Get your head out of your arse, we want you guys to stand on your own feet regarding defense and its been like pulling teeth so lets first see if you guys can handle that.(we have been trying since Eisenhower!) But make no mistake we are still on the same side.
SSQ-II 1000 Ship Navy 2018
April 27, 2025 at 6:44 pm
Spoken like a liberal ideologue without any comprehensive understanding of long term military procurement programs and the sheer cost of them driven by cutting edge technologies. Trump will be gone in 3-3/4 years, the F-35 program started about ten times that duration back in the 1990’s.
Prime Minister Sea King II will not last more than a term, possibly gone before Trump reaches the end of his two term limit.
Treason by omission is still treason when you wilfully undermine national security for crass political points that make no political or military sense.
David Chang
April 26, 2025 at 7:11 am
God blesses people in world.
The problem with the F-35 series is that it is tasked with taking on too many combat missions in order to support a wrong foreign policy. The F-35 is responsible for a variety of combat missions. In electronic warfare, the F-35 requires a stable power supply and an efficient cooling system.
But according to the wrong foreign policy and strategy, the F-35D will be carrying out difficult combat operations at the request of allies, if they want to win the general war without general war policy.
If the F-35 is the M2 Bradley in air combat, the expected F-35D will be the M1A2 Abrams. But the upgrade process for the existing F-35 is like upgrading from M2A0 to M2A4.
Without the right strategy of a war in the Western Pacific, people will hope that the F-35 or F-47 is awesome, but it’s also an awesome strategy dilemma like going from CVBG to CSG.
God blesses people in America.
George
April 26, 2025 at 8:56 am
You do realize they sent an F35 to intercept a Bear the other day which just so happened to have an A-50 tagging along. Your precious little “invisible” aircraft has been painted over ad-nauseum. The F35 is the biggest boondoggle in history. You can’t even keep them operationally ready.
Curt
April 26, 2025 at 10:24 am
Must be a slow day in defense news.
How exactly is this strategy different than say the F-16, which morphed from the F-16A that carried iron bombs and Sidewinder through the F-16 of today?
Or the F-18? F-15? The SU-27? MiG-29? Rafale? Eurofighter? Gripen? A myriad of Chinese aircraft? The C-130? UH-60? Shoot, the B-52?
And let’s not forget the civilian side, with how many versions of the 737, A320, 777, Cessna 152, Dash-7, Jet-Ranger, etc. Adding technology to existing airframes is not some outlier idea, it is the vast majority of Aerospace development.
How many Cold War fighters are still in production with new technology? The list is shorter if you ask how many are not still in production. About the only ones not still in production had some really expensive technology like variable geometry wings.
And finally, what do you think Lockheed is going to say? The same company who makes the C-130 (first flight, 1954), the F-16 (first flight 1973), and UH-60/S-70 (1976). Oh no, we are just going to go out of business? What did Boeing do when they lost the competition that led to the F-35?
Maaku
April 26, 2025 at 10:45 am
If you take the money the Democrats looted from the Treasury, you could upgrade the entire fleet.
JDDrouin
April 26, 2025 at 12:41 pm
Pure advertising drivel from a manufacturer eliminated from a contract and whose current claim to fame is a program rife with problems. There was a whole lot of verbiage repeated multiple times, but nothing even remotely concrete.
Marcus
April 26, 2025 at 6:11 pm
Maybe LM should get the A/B/C versions working before they move on to the fancy new D version?
In any case, the F-35’s airframe isn’t remotely stealthy enough to operate in future contested environments and barring some amazing revolution in jet engine fuel efficiency will never meet the F-47 programs range requirement. Seems like a doa boondoggle.
WarCraft for life
April 27, 2025 at 8:50 am
So the Lockheed NGAD aircraft that failed all the design competitions (usaf, usn, and Japan competition), is trying to go around the competition results. They have been talking about this NGAD F-22/F-35 hybrid since the F-35 competition ended.
SSQ-II 1000 Ship Navy 2018
April 27, 2025 at 6:36 pm
The internal upgrades discussed will occur at some point in the future as technology evolves regardless. If the internal updates help fix the many bugs inside that are known to exist open source (even though details usually are not revealed for obvious reasons), then have at it. Reliability and sustainability are the aircraft’s major shortcomings, the end production numbers will likely fall short due to multiple causes if the status quo is maintained.
The largest deficiency of the F-35 is the airframe, and contrary to the spokesperson claims, it is not as stealthy as it could be.
The F-35 needs an airframe overhaul much like what happened with the F-18E/F. The tri-stream jet engine prototypes have worked well to date, the F-35B’s is an early disaggregated version of them, but the diameter’s are bigger, and the F-35 already is overly thick. It might be possible to stretch the aircraft with a big compound delta wing with engine tripass air blown inboard flaps, eliminating the radar reflecting tailplanes and improving STOL performance while giving a 50%+ increase in range. Double length weapons bays would expand its internal carriage to include anti-ship/strike cruise and ramjet missiles or a large number of AAM’s.
The frickin’ laser beam would be an expensive toy degraded easily by countermeasures, a close range aircraft guided missile system would be a better replacement for the now largely obsolete fixed gun.