Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Uncategorized

JAS 39 Gripen E Fighter: The 1 Thing That Could Make It Obsolete

JAS 39
JAS 39. Image Credit: Creative Commons.

Sweden’s post-Cold War jet of choice is an export success, but the platform is not getting any younger. The JAS 39 Gripen may soon bow out as fifth- and sixth-generation aircraft emerge to command the skies.

The Gripen has been the backbone of the Swedish air force since the Soviet Union collapsed and the Cold War ended. The lightweight, relatively small single-engine jet is highly maneuverable and is noted for its low cost per flight hour, as well a design that prioritizes simplicity and ease of refit and maintenance.

Since the Gripen entered service in the early 1990s, it has filled a unique niche within the aerospace defense market. The Gripen stands for a common-sense approach to fighter-jet design.

However, one thing, and it boils down to one word, could make it obsolete: No stealth like the F-35. 

In the Beginning

The JAS 39 Gripen story began with Saab’s older Viggen and Draken fighter and interceptor airplanes. Based on a modified delta-wing design, those older jets met Sweden’s unique fighter requirements, including short take-off and landing distances, the ability to attack targets on the ground and in the air, and reconnaissance capabilities. But by the late Cold War, both platforms needed to be replaced.

Any successor jet had to suit Sweden’s unique force structure, one that relies heavily on conscripts to swell its ranks and deploys its fighter jets to small, widely dispersed air bases throughout the country. That arrangement was meant to prevent a knockout blow from the Soviet Union.

The most recent variant is the Gripen E. As the company explains, the newest Gripen has “10 hard points, offers the best in class weapons and pods from around the world; and has an unrivaled ease of stores integration.”

The Swedish firm adds that the JAS 39 Gripen E is able to “conduct air-to-air, air-to-surface and reconnaissance missions. Air supremacy is achieved with the carriage of up to seven Meteor Beyond Visual Range Air-to-Air Missiles and two Within Visual Range IRIS-T missiles. Weapons like these, combined with the ability to use offensive and defensive means simultaneously, enables Gripen E to detect, engage and suppress or destroy targets effectively.”

While Sweden does not have any aircraft carriers in service, the firm produces a marinized version of the jet. Built to withstand corrosive at-sea environments, the jet is also strengthened to tackle the stresses of carrier landings and take-off.

Saab’s design has proven attractive in the export market. Countries including Brazil, the Czech Republic, Hungary, South Africa, Sweden, Thailand, and the United Kingdom, have adopted Gripens in several different variants, either as their country’s primary fighter jet or as a lightweight trainer aircraft. Their purchases are strong evidence that Saab succeeded in producing a potent fighter package while also striking a careful balance between operational flexibility and performance—all at a reasonable price.

An Upgraded Future?

Since its introduction into Swedish service, the Gripen E has received a few upgrades. For example, the Swedes gave the Gripen E/F an upgraded engine: Volvo’s Reaktionsmotor 12 is a modified F404 engine from General Electric that offers better resistance to foreign object ingestion while also improving performance. The jet’s electronic warfare suite has also been upgraded—but despite the improvements, the Gripen is increasingly challenged by established and emerging platforms.

Though the JAS 39 Gripen E catered initially to countries looking for a more affordable, lightweight fighter that cannot secure access to higher-performance platforms like the F-35, that market is becoming smaller and smaller.

South Korea’s Korea Aerospace Industries would like to export their KF-21, a moderately stealthy fighter, in the near future. Though that jet carries its weapons externally, a decidedly non-stealthy design choice, KAI would like to improve the KF-21’s radar-absorbent coatings and carry weapons internally in the future.

Sweden JAS 39 Fighter. Image Credit: Creative Commons.

Sweden JAS 39 Fighter. Image Credit: Creative Commons.

Sweden JAS 39 Fighter. Image Credit: Creative Commons.

JAS 39 Gripen. Image Credit: Creative Commons.

Sweden JAS 39 Fighter. Image Credit: Creative Commons.

JAS 39 Gripen. Image Credit: Creative Commons.

On the higher end of the spectrum is the Global Combat Air Programme, a tripartite effort to design and build a sixth-generation fighter. GCAP, which counts Italy’s Leonardo, the United Kingdom’s BAE Systems, and Japan’s Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, hopes to produce a viable alternative to the F-2s and Eurofighter Typhoons in their respective inventories. Rumor has it that Saudi Arabia would like to join GCAP.

What Happens Now for JAS 39 Gripen E

In a world in which stealthy alternatives are increasingly available, and as the United States, Europe, and China eye the next generation in aerospace technology, can the Gripen survive? Without the aid of more advanced aircraft, the JAS 39 Gripen E may have difficulty taking on more advanced jets.

But against other fourth-generation aircraft—the Gripen E’s contemporaries—it could continue to serve an important role.

About the Author: Caleb Larson 

Caleb Larson is an American multiformat journalist based in Berlin, Germany. His work covers the intersection of conflict and society, focusing on American foreign policy and European security. He has reported from Germany, Russia, and the United States. Most recently, he covered the war in Ukraine, reporting extensively on the war’s shifting battle lines from Donbas and writing on the war’s civilian and humanitarian toll. Previously, he worked as a Defense Reporter for POLITICO Europe. You can follow his latest work on X.

Written By

Caleb Larson is an American multiformat journalist based in Berlin, Germany. His work covers the intersection of conflict and society, focusing on American foreign policy and European security. He has reported from Germany, Russia, and the United States. Most recently, he covered the war in Ukraine, reporting extensively on the war’s shifting battle lines from Donbas and writing on the war's civilian and humanitarian toll. Previously, he worked as a Defense Reporter for POLITICO Europe.

13 Comments

13 Comments

  1. Michael

    May 10, 2025 at 10:56 am

    You still can’t hide sound. Across Ukraine a network of permanently deployed mobile phones are set up as a early warning system for incoming drones/shaheds/missiles/planes. It’s a smart and impressive system that allows for triangulation of the sound. Now use the acoustic info and compare it to the tiny radar blip that is moving way to fast and you get an idea if it’s a bird, missile or stealth jet.

    Gripen is designed for defensive purposes, keeping the enemy from reaching your territory. Sink every russian ship on it’s way over the Baltic, take down bombers on their way across the Baltic etc. There is no one size fits all and that is where the stealth talk gets real old.

    There is a reason why the US pressured Sweden into canceling the transfer of Gripen C to Ukraine and it had nothing to do with Ukraines lack of capacity. The simple explanation is that some in the US did not want to see the F16 in a side-by-side comparison with Gripen C, just like it’s increasingly clear that some in the US do not want to see the F35 in a side-by-side comparison with the Gripen E.

  2. Øyvin Hanssen

    May 10, 2025 at 9:57 pm

    Flygsystem 2020 is the answer.

  3. JamesP

    May 10, 2025 at 11:20 pm

  4. Vir

    May 11, 2025 at 9:35 am

    Mistake in the article, the new E/F version has the GE F414G (Swedish designation RM16) not the RM12.

  5. Baalzie

    May 11, 2025 at 11:36 am

    Another propaganda piece by an American and dealer shill….

    Don’t you get tired of proving how brainwashed and silly you are?

    Gripen starts odling US heta and all of a sudden we’re drowning in anti JAS articles from Yankee Doodle Muppets…

  6. 5am

    May 11, 2025 at 11:54 am

    The gripen is a paper warrior. Its merits are hypothetical. The f35 is battle proven and combat ready

  7. Paul Mynard

    May 11, 2025 at 9:30 pm

    Not using an American motor might gather more sales.

  8. Michael

    May 12, 2025 at 6:57 am

    You mean the israeli version? That’s not the one any one else has or will get.

    And the real reason we see all these silly articles is that some people really do NOT want to see the Gripen E in a side-by-side comparison with the F35. Just like some people did NOT want to see the Gripen C in a side-by-side comparison with F16 and stopped Sweden from transferring them to Ukraine. Those people have a fairly good idea of how the comparison would go down – and if there is no risk of embarrassment, why all the fuss?

  9. Mustafa leake

    May 12, 2025 at 5:44 pm

    Here we go, yet ANOTHER “The Walls Are Closing In” article, attempting to prove (unsuccessfully) that everyone elses kit is markedly inferior to Murrcan equipment (🥱).
    I think an article titled “The Walls Are Closing In On The U.S.A. And, Shucks, No-One Can Do A Goldarn Thang About It!” would be much better received by folk all around the world.
    Have a reeal nice day y’all! 🪕

  10. 5am

    May 12, 2025 at 11:30 pm

    Starting in 2018, All 3 U.S. versions of the F35 have seen combat.

  11. FA

    May 13, 2025 at 6:34 pm

    Bombing insurgents who have virtually no tech can hardly be called ‘combat’. Its like a heavyweight boxer going against featherweights only, and then claiming he’s the best. This is obviously aimed at the F 35 fanboys.

  12. Michael

    May 14, 2025 at 5:32 pm

    FA and 5am,

    Has the US version F35 been up against any near-peer opponents? (the Israeli version has done a raid on Iran, but that isn’t the same F35)

  13. Fredrik Seglem

    May 15, 2025 at 4:57 pm

    You could supply with 69 stealthy drones with the leftover money for each airplane

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Advertisement