Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Smart Bombs: Military, Defense, National Security and More

Stryker: The U.S. Army’s Nearly Forgotten Armored Personnel Carrier

Stryker APC
Image: Creative Commons.

The Army is known for its tracked vehicles, specifically the Bradley Infantry Fighting Vehicle, the Abrams Tank, and the Paladin self-propelled howitzer. But it does have a multi-wheeled light-armored personnel carrier that often gets overlooked. The Stryker is under-rated but a soldier-favorite. It is fast and agile – able to get to the fight or out of the fight quickly.

Stryker Has Checkered History

In the late 1990s, the Army had a problem. There was the Humvee, which was versatile and light. Numerous Humvees could be air-lifted to the theater of operations without a problem. However, the Humvee is really a utility vehicle that was designed for the rear – not necessarily for battle. The next step up was the Bradley Infantry Fighting Vehicle. The Bradley did well in Operation Desert Storm, but it is heavy and more difficult to transport.

So by 1999, the Army needed an intermediate fighting vehicle. That was when the acquisition got kicked off by General Eric Shinseki, then Army Chief of Staff, who directed designers to make a variant of the Canadian Light-Armored Vehicle. The eight-wheeled Stryker was born. Shinseki loved its mobility, speed, and lighter weight. He thought was the perfect armored personnel carrier that could be effortlessly transported by a C-5, a C-17, or a C-130.

Army Tankers Laughed at the Stryker

This was controversial. The Army’s armored branch was fighting mad. They thought the Stryker would not be tough enough for battle. Its armor was too thin, the critics said. It looked like a weak European vehicle, the naysayers said. But Shinseki was unmoved, and the Stryker went forward.

It’s a good thing Shinseki stuck to his guns and trusted his instincts because the Stryker has more than pulled its weight over the years. The best thing about the wheel vehicle is its speed. It can go 60 miles per hour – much faster than a Bradley. It’s totally versatile. There are 18 variants. There is a different Stryker that is tricked out for any need you can think of. There is one that carries mortars, there is one that carriers engineers, there is one that carries a Javelin anti-tank missile system, there is a medevac vehicle, and there is a special model for commanders, among others.

The other great thing about the Stryker is that it is perfect for urban warfare. Here is where the critics were wrong. They thought it would get stuck in the mud in the defilade fight in Korea. But the second war in Iraq was mainly fought in cities and in neighborhoods with paved roads. This was the perfect environment for Stryker’s speed and mobility.

Could It Survive Iraq?

The other question was survivability. What if the Stryker was hit by multiple RPGs? The Army came up with a solution. It developed the Hull Protection Kit with slat armor and a ballistic shield for the commander. Slat armor means the RPG rounds will explode before it hits the vehicle.

The Stryker also increased crew survivability with the remote weapon station and later, the Common Remotely Operated Weapon Station (CROWS). This allowed various weapons systems such as the 30mm cannon, the M2 .50 caliber machine gun, or the Mk-19 grenade launcher to be remotely operated while the soldiers stayed buttoned up inside the vehicle. There are two crew members and a nine-person infantry squad that can fit inside.

One could imagine all the possibilities for this vehicle. Rapid insertion and removal of troops; getting wounded to the hospital, and allowing commanders to be directly in battle with the soldiers – to name just a few. All of this worked great with the Stryker. It had a controversial beginning and a lot of early critics, but the vehicle should now be rated an overall success.

1945’s new Defense and National Security Editor, Brent M. Eastwood, PhD, is the author of Humans, Machines, and Data: Future Trends in Warfare. He is an Emerging Threats expert and former U.S. Army Infantry officer.

Written By

Now serving as 1945s New Defense and National Security Editor, Brent M. Eastwood, PhD, is the author of Humans, Machines, and Data: Future Trends in Warfare. He is an Emerging Threats expert and former U.S. Army Infantry officer.

2 Comments

2 Comments

  1. Michael

    October 8, 2021 at 12:33 pm

    Great article ….Thank you !

  2. Cenebar

    October 13, 2021 at 2:47 pm

    There is a lot more to write about the Stryker story.

    The Stryker’s maturity of the “Double-V Hull” against IEDs and add-on accessories is what makes the Stryker a unique success story because this is the platform that the US Army uses for a lot of experimentation and variants, such as SHORADS, lasers, ECM, C5ISR, and now the famous Dragoon Stryker with 30mm RWS turret.

    Recall that the Stryker was criticized because the US Army removed the 25mm turret and turret basket in favor of a nine-man squad. The lack of vehicle firepower, even with CROWS, is a common complaint that wasn’t remedied until the Kongsberg 30mm RWS turret was installed on Dragoon versions. The 30mm Kongsberg RWS turret doesn’t have a turret basket to penetrate into the hull so the nine-man squad has been retained. This increases the lethality to better than a LAV III 25mm version which the Stryker was originally based off of.

    Strykers themselves with CROWS are pretty anemic, but 30mm Dragoon and SHORAD Strykers with RWS of 30mm, 7.62mm, four Stingers, and two Hellfires are the variants that pack a wallop in terms of aiding the US Army with mobile firepower greater than the armor of the Strykers.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Advertisement