Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Smart Bombs: Military, Defense and National Security

NASAMS: Expert Explains How It Will Help Ukraine Kill Russia’s Missiles

NASAMS. Image Credit: Creative Commons.
NASAMS launch. Image Credit: Industry Handout.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy won’t take no for an answer when it comes to arms requests. His country has been plagued by Russian cruise and ballistic missiles, but now Ukraine’s bulldog-in-chief, grim-faced and prpetually decked out in army green, has sunk his teeth into a recent weapons donation that could pay dividends: a surface-to-air missile system from the United States. 


NASAMS. Image Credit: Creative Commons.

Specifically, Ukraine has received the National Advanced Surface-to-Air Missile System, or NASAMS. Two NASAMS interceptors were part of a new military aid package of $820 million announced by the United States on July 1. 

Raytheon Missile and Defense paired up with Norway’s Kongsberg to develop this short-range air defense system. Newer versions of the NASAMS feature the advanced Ghost Eye Radar, which expands the range and accuracy of the air defender. This is a NATO system, and it is meant to wean Ukraine off the Soviet-era S-300

This week, 1945 asked a missile defense expert whether NASMAS can provide a solution against Russian missiles and satisfy Zelenskyy’s quest for modern missile defenders.

Drawbacks and Benefits

John Venable is the senior research fellow in defense policy at the Heritage Foundation’s Center for National Defense in Washington, D.C. Venable says missile defense is a numbers game, and Ukraine is running out of interceptors.

“The Ukrainian S-300 stockpile is very likely running low, and they need more missiles to continue to hold Russian aircraft at risk,” Venable says. “The S-300 is an excellent system and, assuming the West had a large reserve of those missiles, the best option would be to provide them to Ukraine. However, that reserve has been depleted, and providing additional missiles for Ukraine’s S-300 systems would likely put donor nations at risk. The only remaining option is to provide them with Western systems, like NASAMS.”

Zelenskyy’s concern about Russian cruise missiles may be somewhat lessened by the NASAMS, but its shorter range could be an issue, as Venable explains. “NASAMS has a solid capability against aircraft, drones, and cruise missiles, but it is limited to engaging targets out to about 20 miles – less than half the range of the S-300,” Venable says. “SAMs must have line-of-sight to engage a threat and cruise missiles flying at low altitudes, particularly in hilly or mountainous terrain, would easily cut the acquisition range of the system in half. With that, NASAMS is a short range, point defense system.”

Venable notes that Ukrainians will need extra time to train. “As with most modern systems, a significant amount of training will be required for operators employing NASAMS, but the time required to train the technicians who set up, troubleshoot and repair it will dwarf that required for operators. Setting up the logistics for replacement components, spare parts and missiles will also present big hurdles,” he says. 

Which NASAMS Is Ukraine Getting?

Ukraine may be getting an older model of the NASAMS. As Venable clarifies, “NASAMS has been upgraded several times since it was originally fielded in the late 1990s, and the U.S. no longer employs the first generation of systems. That version employed the ground-launched version of the Advanced Medium Range Air to Air Missile (AMRAAM) with a range of about 18 miles. 

“NASAMS 2 uses the same missile but was fielded with an improved radar. The NASAMS 3 upgrade incorporated an extended-range version of the AMRAAM that will reach targets out to 30 miles and added a shorter range IR missile – the AiM-9X. While the U.S. has not announced which version it is providing to Ukraine, it is likely NASAMS 1 or NASAMS 2.”

While the NASAMS is an important donation, it does have its weak points. Namely it is a short-range system, and it needs line-of-sight to lock onto its target, which is difficult to achieve at long range when attempting to eliminate low-flying cruise missiles. It could also take weeks or even months to train operators and the maintenance technicians who will get the hardware in working condition. Despite these downsides, Zelenskyy should be pleased he is getting a NATO system – and perhaps more NATO allies can make the NASAMS available. Zelenskyy is likely to keep hectoring for more air defenders as the Donbas fight becomes more decisive. This initial donation of NASAMS is a step in the right direction.

Now serving as 1945’s Defense and National Security Editor, Brent M. Eastwood, PhD, is the author of Humans, Machines, and Data: Future Trends in Warfare. He is an Emerging Threats expert and former U.S. Army Infantry officer. You can follow him on Twitter @BMEastwood.

Written By

Now serving as 1945s New Defense and National Security Editor, Brent M. Eastwood, PhD, is the author of Humans, Machines, and Data: Future Trends in Warfare. He is an Emerging Threats expert and former U.S. Army Infantry officer.



  1. aldol11

    July 6, 2022 at 3:27 pm

    f16’s next

    • Jim Carner

      July 13, 2022 at 11:13 pm

      I’ve read it would take a while to train up Ukrainian pilots on western fighters. Probably to become very proficient, since that’s dependent on training, aptitude and flight hours, but to just launch Harpoons at Russian ships in the Black Sea for example? Would probably only take a few weeks training I’d have thought. Same probably goes for F-16s firing anti-radiation missiles to take out SAM systems.

      • Jim Carner

        July 13, 2022 at 11:20 pm

        Or Super Hornets firing LRASM or AARGM missiles.

  2. Ray Shewmaker

    July 6, 2022 at 4:23 pm

    F-16’s, why not. When you break down the technology being used. NATO “Rocks” would undoubtedly be more deadly than Russian ones.I should point more deadly against Actual Combatant’s. Russian Rockets are dangerest they just don’t have any idea to whom. It seems that the Russian Rich are Committing Suicide in Unusually Large Numbers. Probably just a accident some have complained to Putin about his unnecessary war. Making Russia a “”PARIAH NATION””. Every Nation even doing Business with Russia has to worry about their intent. ??⚓?

  3. Ray Shewmaker

    July 6, 2022 at 4:40 pm

    PS it is a Shame, Russia was on course to become a meaningful & respected member of the International Community.????⚓?

  4. Jim Carner

    July 13, 2022 at 10:48 pm

    I read the other day that anti-radiation drones would be very useful to Ukraine. That makes sense since they could target Russian SAM systems, SHORAD systems and jamming systems.

    This would not only make Ukrainian manned strike aircraft far more survivable, it would also prevent Ukrainian drones from being jammed.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *