Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

The Gun Safe

Springfield Armory M1911-A1 20,000 Round Review: The Only Reliable Non-Custom 1911 Gun?

Springfield Armory M1911-A1
Springfield Armory M1911-A1. Image Credit: Industry Handout.

In recent articles on Glock pistols, I made some slightly critical comments about the M1911 series – sacrilege, I know. But this does not mean that I dislike the 1911 or the .45 ACP cartridge. Believe it or not, the 1911 was the second pistol platform I fell in love with, after the Beretta 92F. I first became a 1911 .45 fan at the tender age of 15, in October 1990, when I tried out a stainless steel Colt Series 80 Mk IV Government Model at the dear ol’ Los Angeles Gun Club

My first two handgun purchases were both 1911s. They were both accurate and had crisp trigger pulls. But neither of them was reliable – neither could handle a measly 200 jam-free rounds with standard 230-grain full metal jacket “hardball,” let alone jacketed hollowpoints. 

But the third time really was the charm, and I finally struck gold with the Springfield Armory Mil-Spec stainless steel M1911-A1. 

Springfield Springs Forth

Just for clarification, “Springfield Armory” within the context of this article does not refer to the original Springfield Armory in Springfield, Mass., which has been a national historic landmark since 1978, but rather to the company acquired by the Reese family in 1974 and headquartered in Geneseo, Ill

By the mid-1980s, the company emerged as the first serious challenger to Colt’s longstanding name-brand domination of the 1911 pistol market. To give you folks an appreciation of the magnitude of this market coup, the .45 ACP cartridge’s acronym does in fact stand for “Automatic Colt Pistol.” Springfield’s 1911 clones quickly established a reputation for quality at prices that were considerably lower than Colt’s. 

Alas, in 1992 the company fell upon troubled times and had to declare bankruptcy. Indeed, my very first 1911 purchase was a pre-bankruptcy Springfield specimen. For the record, the second one was a Charles Daly brand. Neither one of these guns would work properly after the obligatory 400-round break-in phase, not even after a trip back to the manufacturers for warranty service, or to competent gunsmiths.

Luckily when Springfield reorganized after bankruptcy, they got their act together. In the following decade, renowned gun writer and law enforcement veteran Massad F. Ayoob — himself a lifelong Colt guy — stated that, “Springfield Armory is now making the best guns of its existence.”

Springfield Armory Saves the Day

Taking Massad’s words to heart, I purchased the Springfield that broke my run of bad luck in 2003 from Belleville Shooting Range (now known as Metro Shooting Supplies) in Belleville, Ill. At the time I was a U.S. Air Force 2nd Lieutenant stationed at Scott AFB. I paid $550 for it back then, which equates to $885.71 in today’s money. 

To my pleasant surprise, Mas Ayoob was right, by golly! Not only did it finally meet the reliability threshold of 200 jam-free rounds with factory hardball, it did so with jacketed hollowpoints as well! In the 19 years that I’ve owned this gun, the only times she has ever jammed on me were once when I way over-gooped the slide rails with Break-Free CLP (literally too much of a good thing), and again when I used a batch of really piss-poor Russian steel-case ammo that I had bought on the cheap at a gun show in Belleville. I estimate that I’ve put somewhere in the neighborhood of 20,000 rounds through this old girl in her lifetime. 

Pros and Cons

Pros: Like I already said, I finally had a reliable 1911 — Glory Hallelujah! The only factory original parts on my Springfield that didn’t last were the black plastic grips, which cracked at roughly the 3,000-round mark and were replaced by a single-piece Pachmayr wraparound rubber grip.

Accuracy was good too; tight groups at 7 yards and 15 yards. At 25 yards, I can score head shots more than half the time, and the rounds will stay on the torso at 50 yards. Regarding that last distance, the late great Chuck Taylor opined many years ago that, “If your handgun possesses enough accuracy to hit a man in the chest at 50 meters, then you have more accuracy than you will probably ever need!” That said, the recent incident with a CCW hero in Indiana does show the benefits of having the means and ability to dial long-distance with a handgun. 

Trigger pull is crisper than typical older GI-spec .45s. Speaking of GI specs, it does seem like a bit of misnomer to call Springfield’s stainless steel variant a “Mil-Spec,” since true military-issue 1911s had either a blue or Parkerized finish, but I ain’t complaining. Stainless steel is far more maintenance-friendly due to its superior resistance to rust, corrosion, and holster wear. And the high visibility sights are a damn sight better than the old military-issue .45s, which also aids practical accuracy. 

 As with any 1911, if you wish to customize your Springfield, the options and accessories are endless, as a quick peek through the Brownells catalog will tell you.

Cons: While the accuracy is good for a non-custom 1911, my SA Mil-Spec still isn’t nearly as accurate as my Glock 21SF or my Beretta M9. (You know, the gun that brewed up such a crap-storm of controversy when it replaced the M1911 as the U.S. Armed Forces standard-issue sidearm back in the 1980s.) The trigger, though adequate, still is a bit creepy and somewhat irritating to the touch of the index finger after an extended shooting session. And while I personally have never had any issues with the factory-stock grip safety, many of the same blindly loyal members of the 1911 cult who praise the gun’s ergonomics to the high heavens turn around and contradict themselves by insisting that the gun is painfully uncomfortable to shoot without an aftermarket beavertail grip safety.

Regarding the stainless-steel variant in particular, though it is maintenance-friendly, gunsmiths aren’t as fond of working on these variants because of stainless steel’s tendency toward galling

Compared with newer makes from Beretta, Glock, and SIG, the 1911 is annoyingly more tricky and time-consuming to field-strip and reassemble: You have to deal with a separate barrel bushing, a recoil spring plug that can go flying off like a champagne cork, and a swinging barrel link. My big question for the 1911 purists: if the M1911 is truly the greatest thing since sliced bread, then why did its very own inventor, John Moses Browning, see fit to improve upon it by doing away with those extra parts when he designed the P-35 Browning Hi-Power?!?!?! Riddle me that, Batmen and Batgirls…

Springfield Armory M1911-A1: Final Thoughts

By the way, since I bought that Springfield 19 years ago, I have purchased three other 1911-pattern pistols: a coveted Colt Series 70 Combat Commander; an even more coveted, genuine First World War-era Colt M1911, made in October 1918; and a Colt 10mm Delta Elite. All three of them are plagued by the same reliability issues that afflicted my first two 1911s: stovepipe jams, failures to feed, double-feeds, extraction failures, the whole nine yards. 

I can tell you that I have no such jamming problems with other makes and models chambered for .45 ACP, from the Glock 21SF and Glock 36 to the SIG Sauer P220 and the Smith & Wesson 4506. Further, I have competed in my fair share of IDPA, IPSC, and PPC matches, and I see far more choke-ups with 1911s than with any other pistol type. What’s more, even some of the 1911’s biggest fans, such as renowned gunsmiths Dave Lauck and the living legend Bill Wilson, will tell you that the 1911 typically needs extra work to be a reliable combat weapon. All of which firmly convinces me that without paying extra for a “factory custom” pistol like Kimber or Rock River Arms, 1911s like the Springfield Mil-Spec that are reliable out of the box are the exception, and not the rule.

As much as I love the 1911 pistol – especially my Springfield – I don’t have the cultist obsession with it that so many of its fans do. I guess you could call it more of a love-hate relationship for me. Feel free to hate me, y’all. 

Christian D. Orr has 33 years of shooting experience, starting at the tender age of 14. His marksmanship accomplishments include: the Air Force Small Arms Ribbon w/one device (for M16A2 rifle and M9 pistol); Pistol Expert Ratings from U.S. Customs & Border Protection (CBP), Immigration & Customs Enforcement (ICE), and the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center (FLETC) Criminal Investigator Training Program (CITP); multiple medals and trophies via the Glock Sport Shooting Foundation (GSSF) and the Nevada Police & Fires Games (NPAF). Chris has been an NRA Certified Basic Pistol Instructor since 2011.  

Written By

Christian D. Orr is a former Air Force officer, Federal law enforcement officer, and private military contractor (with assignments worked in Iraq, the United Arab Emirates, Kosovo, Japan, Germany, and the Pentagon).

1 Comment

1 Comment

  1. John

    July 27, 2022 at 12:26 pm

    I was born in 1945. A year before I was born, my uncle, John A Moore, the commander of the submarine the USS Grayback, went down in Japanese waters after sinking a respectful tonnage of Japanese vessels. 70 years later his sunken submarine was rediscovered. Before he went on this final tour, he told a member of the family that he would not be coming back. He knew what was in store for him and being the hero that he was, he went without hesitation.

    Then why am I disturbed by the publishing of this article, “Springfield Armory M1911-A1 20,000 Round Review: The Only Reliable Non-Custom 1911 Gun?”?

    After all, my father spent a year in the Border Patrol with a perfect record and was told that if he continued he could be expected to rise through the ranks. And my father taught me to safely handle a gun when I was 8 (e.g. “never point a gun at anyone whether it is loaded or not…”)

    Well, part of the answer is my mother was a teacher and taught migrant children that year. I always suspected she only taught for one year because she was probably extruded by the system. She was supposed to be there to teach. She wasn’t supposed to notice that the children were poverty-stricken. She spent time ministering to their medical plight when she saw them come to school with puss in their eyes. In those days migrant field workers were taken advantage of and sometimes found themselves in terrible conditions set up by those who used them. We owe the migrant workers a huge debt for the cheap food and vegetables we have enjoyed for generations.

    That is why I think Mom made Dad leave the Border Patrol.

    It was just as well. My father, despite growing up in poverty with no college education, became an assayer and test engineer for a mining company and before he retired was offered a position to be a head chemist for a corporate-wide team of chemical engineers with PhDs.

    So what’s wrong with 1945 and the article? Something is missing.

    When I first encountered 1945, I liked and appreciated its open and commendable policies.

    But now I think the elephant in the room is that there is a big cop-out. It reminds me of the period years ago when there was a fairness policy in the broadcast. Both sides of the news were presented side by side with no analysis and no where to go after everything is said.

    I intentionally did not say “said and done” because the result always left me sort of empty because everything stopped after the speech and it usually went nowhere after that. The whole thing usually ended up being a waste of breath.

    The fact is what is more important is that the World is loaded with many issues, and if we are going to solve them, it is a waste of valuable time and energy to beat around the bush. Talking just to talk can be a waste.

    The only effective paths are the shortest paths to the solution. Everything else is fluff because it ends up canceling itself out.

    Admittedly it is true we can’t just stop talking, talking is part of the process too.

    The tricky part is sorting out the definition of “shortest” and what roles we need to play in it. That is the hardest part, but that is where the rubber meets the road, and that is where our hard work would make a real difference.

    So where does that put this gun article? The article serves the purpose of an author who is apparently obsessed with guns and planes and little else, and I’m sure members of the NRA would enjoy it. But as far as being constructive or useful to publish for any real reason, I don’t see it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Advertisement