Work Advancing on U.S. Navy Columbia-class Ballistic Missile Submarine: The U.S. Navy’s new Columbia-class submarine continues to hit its milestones.
This month the sub’s main propulsion system was delivered, and a contract was awarded for the ballistic missile sub’s generators.
So, things are proceeding nicely for the next-generation boat that is to replace the Ohio-class submarines that will begin to retire in 2027.
One aspect of production that could create a schedule slip for the Columbia-class is the availability of skilled workers. The U.S. defense industrial base will have to recruit a talented workforce to meet deadlines.
Columbia-class Forging Ahead
It has been a busy summer for the Columbia-class.
In June, the keel for the first new boat, the USS District of Columbia, was laid. Construction began on this sub in 2020.
Twelve submarines will be built in all to maintain the United States’ nuclear triad. Boomer subs provide 70 percent of America’s deployed nuclear weapon capacity.
The Columbia-class are the largest submarines ever built by the navy.
This is the top priority defense acquisition program in the service branch as the Columbia boomers will serve into the 2070s.
Propulsion System Ready for Integration
This month, Leonardo DRS sent General Dynamics Electric Boat the main propulsion system for the District of Columbia for integration. Rojoef Manuel of the Defense Post wrote that “The propulsion system recently completed factory acceptance trials, including full power endurance and related tests, which began in December 2020.”
Generator Contract Awarded
In other recent news for the Columbia-class, Northrop Grumman awarded a contract to Curtiss-Wright in a $120 million bid to provide generators for the new subs. In 2021, Curtiss-Wright also provided pumps for the Columbia-class in a contract valued at $100 million.
Work is being conducted at the firm’s Cheswick, Pennsylvania plant.
Skilled Workers Are Needed
Integration, construction, and contract execution is dependent on a skilled workforce that can be employed to allow the Columbia-class to make its development goals on time and under budget. USNI News reported from a nuclear-deterrence event at the Mitchell Institute and quoted Rear Admiral Scott Pappano who brought up the topic of recruiting welders, electricians, riggers and other employees.
“We need skilled trades feeding our industrial base,” Pappano said. He also explained how Chinese shipbuilders are pumping out new ships and submarines regularly to make up the world’s biggest naval fleet. Russia has also improved its nuclear triad by advancing its submarine force. New American workers are needed to keep up with adversaries. “For many years, we left that [training] to the contractors. We don’t have that luxury anymore,” he said.
Columbia-class boats will be 560 feet long with a beam of 43 feet.
The reactor is designed to last the life of the ship with a shorter mid-life re-fueling period.
The Columbia-class has 16 missile tubes – fewer than the Ohio-class boomers. This should help reduce maintenance costs and downtime. What is known as the Common Missile Compartment, a joint project between the United States and the United Kingdom, will allow the fielding of the Trident II D5 intercontinental ballistic missile. The two naval powers sharing the cost of the Common Missile Compartment will save millions of dollars.
Adapting is the name of the game for the U.S. Navy’s Columbia-class program. The branch will have to remember how contracting can stay on schedule and how trends in workforce development can change rapidly. The navy can help skilled workers become knowledgeable about high-paying jobs in shipyards, perhaps by partnering its acquisition efforts with local government economic development departments. This will help the workforce meet the needs of big defense projects like the Columbia-class submarines. 2027 will be here soon, and the Ohio-class needs to retire around one sub a year. Hitting that deadline will require the navy to leave no stone unturned to ensure the Columbia-class makes it over the finish line.
Expert Biography: Serving as 1945’s Defense and National Security Editor, Dr. Brent M. Eastwood is the author of Humans, Machines, and Data: Future Trends in Warfare. He is an Emerging Threats expert and former U.S. Army Infantry officer. You can follow him on Twitter @BMEastwood. He holds a Ph.D. in Political Science and Foreign Policy/ International Relations.
September 17, 2022 at 7:03 pm
The Navy’s obsession with Bigger ships violates the strategic military necessity of dispersion, in the age of smart weapons. Putting all your eggs in one basket when all it takes is one torpedo to destroy it all, is strategically stupid.
ronald J kozlowski
September 17, 2022 at 7:52 pm
Great observation. Todays arsenal is by far growing smaller more compact for the role. MO, the world has gone insane. Enjoy the ride i guess.
David W Burgess
September 18, 2022 at 8:33 am
My first “Boomer” in 1969 was the Woodrow WillsonSSB(N)645 Blue. Twenty years later, I finished my Navy Career on the Francis Scott Key, SSB(N)657. It was 425 feet long. I don’t remember the beam, but 32ft sticks in my mind. It also carried 16 missiles. What the heck are they putting in there that requires an extra 135 feet in length, and 13ft width? It’s going to be nest to impossible to keep something that size from being detected. One of a boomer’s main objectives is to remain undetected.
September 18, 2022 at 9:24 am
Seeing as now there are “phenomenon’s” that can travel at high speeds just above and below the waves, large nuclear submarines sound like an ideal defence… Are the subs capable of integration of new tech such as launching “tic-tacs” is what I’m curious about.
September 18, 2022 at 9:29 pm
Been on one Boomer and many fast attacks but all it can take is a spoon drop and its all over……
September 19, 2022 at 12:07 am
Why even retire subs that still have usefull life when were getting out built 2-3 to 1? Retiring them sounds like poor planning.
September 19, 2022 at 4:31 pm
Yes, keep all the subs, upgrading as long as possible.
I advocate universal conscription, “…is the availability of skilled workers…” let the US military educate, strengthen, sharpen, and train our youth. I have a multiple and two single subject teaching credentials (k12 covered), and just spent the past seven years working for a large university. The US education system should be scrapped. The country needs to be united. Let the military do it. Period.