Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Smart Bombs: Military, Defense and National Security

Russia Just Threatened Nuclear War over Ukraine (Again)

TOS-1 in Ukraine
TOS-1 firing in Ukraine. Image Credit: Russian Military.

Russia Is Back To Threatening Nuclear War over Ukraine: After first threatening nuclear conflict, then walking back those threats with a government state opposition nuclear war, Russia seems to be back to the nuclear saber-rattling that sparked concerns over Russia’s possible plans to use a nuclear dirty bomb last year.

(Subscribe to Our YouTube Channel Here. 19FortyFive publishes original videos every day.)

On Thursday, deputy chairman of the Security Council of Russia Dmitry Medvedev warned that if NATO allies allow Ukraine to defeat Russia, it could result in a nuclear war.

“The loss of a nuclear power in a conventional war can provoke the beginning of a nuclear war,” Medvedev wrote on Telegram.

“Nuclear powers have never lost major conflicts on which their fate depends,” Medvedev continued.

The former Russian prime minister and president of Russia made the comments at the same time Western leaders met with the Ukraine Defense Contact Group at Ramstein Air Base in Germany.

The meeting will allow European leaders and representatives to coordinate their latest plans to send weapons, ammunition, and financial aid to Ukraine.

Is Medvedev Speaking In An Official Capacity?

Ultimately, it’s down to Russian President Vladimir Putin to decide whether a nuclear conflict is a way forward.

So far, Russia has practiced restraint in some respects, depending on your vantage point – switching to older ammunition while they work out how to manufacture new, advanced ammunition and even deploying decades-old tanks.

Despite major losses and embarrassing setbacks over the last several months, the Kremlin once relied heavily on threats of nuclear war until the Russian Foreign Ministry issued a statement in November dismissing nuclear conflict as an option.

“In implementing its policy on nuclear deterrence Russia is strictly and consistently guided by the tenet that a nuclear war cannot be won and must never be fought,” the statement reads.

It is not unheard of, though, for Russia to reverse course and mislead international powers – meaning that Medvedev’s statement could be based in truth.

The Kremlin may also be depending on the former Russian president to issue these threats in a way that gives Putin plausible deniability.

If the threat is on the table, it may make Western leaders think twice about providing Ukraine with advanced tanks and longer-range missiles and missile systems.

At the same time, the Kremlin can save face by publicly declaring opposition to nuclear war.

Even in the November statement from the Russian Foreign Ministry, the possibility of a future nuclear conflict was not entirely ruled out – and Medvedev’s comments could reflect the caveat outlined just months.

According to the Foreign Ministry, Russia may “hypothetically” restore to the use of nuclear weapons but only “in response to an aggression involving the use of weapons of mass destruction or an aggression with the use of conventional weapons when the very existence of the state is in jeopardy.”

Ultimately, the caveat means that anything the Kremlin says about avoiding nuclear war simply may not be true.

When Russia considers four major regions of Ukraine to be inextricable parts of Russia, the prospect of Russia losing the war is precisely the kind of existential threat that the Kremlin considers worthy of a nuclear response.

MORE: Is Donald Trump a ‘Cognitive Mess’? 

MORE: Should Joe Biden Really Run in 2024? 

MORE: Ron DeSantis May Peak Too Early

Jack Buckby is 19FortyFive’s Breaking News Editor. He is a British author, counter-extremism researcher, and journalist based in New York. Reporting on the U.K., Europe, and the U.S., he works to analyze and understand left-wing and right-wing radicalization, and reports on Western governments’ approaches to the pressing issues of today. His books and research papers explore these themes and propose pragmatic solutions to our increasingly polarized society.

Written By

Jack Buckby is 19FortyFive's Breaking News Editor. He is a British author, counter-extremism researcher, and journalist based in New York. Reporting on the U.K., Europe, and the U.S., he works to analyze and understand left-wing and right-wing radicalization, and reports on Western governments’ approaches to the pressing issues of today. His books and research papers explore these themes and propose pragmatic solutions to our increasingly polarized society.

2 Comments

2 Comments

  1. Jeff

    January 19, 2023 at 2:50 pm

    I wonder how all of the chicken hawks in the democratic party and rinos will respond to this. While Russia should not use nuclear weapons if they are losing the war Biden keeps pushing the envelope.

  2. Cheburator

    January 19, 2023 at 7:11 pm

    The USSR deploys missiles in Cuba – the US threatens nuclear war.
    The US wants to place military bases in Ukraine. Russia begins to threaten with a nuclear one – the US and NATO members are sincerely surprised – why is this so?

    You do not see the connection between action and consequences?
    The United States staged a coup in Ukraine, overthrew a legitimate government that was simply neutral to Russia, which sparked a civil war in Ukraine.
    Finally, they pushed Ukraine into a military confrontation with Russia. Now the situation is getting out of control, and a nuclear strike may already be inflicted on the territory of the United States and NATO countries.
    But neocons still deny their responsibility for the events and cut down any attempt to reach a peace agreement.
    When the world is smoldering in nuclear fire, it will be too late to ask for negotiations.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Advertisement