Nuclear war suddenly seems more relevant than at any point since the 1980s.
Russia, the steward of the world’s largest nuclear weapon stockpile, is engaged in open conflict with Ukraine, while casually threatening to use a tactical nuclear weapon.
North Korea, the world’s most recent nation to attain nuclear weapons, is also openly threatening to use its nuclear weapons.
U.S. President Joe Biden is speaking in terms of a pending ‘armageddon,’ while comparing the current situation to the Cuban Missile Crisis. United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres rated nuclear conflict as “within the realm of possibility.”
What Would a Nuclear War Look Like Today?
Forecasters assess that the chances of a non-test nuclear weapons explosion have risen to roughly ten percent. Typically, the chances of a non-test explosion are pegged around one percent – so, a one thousand percent increase in the likelihood of nuclear weapon deployment. Accordingly, world leaders, and many world citizens, are on edge, asking for the first time in a generation: what would nuclear war look like?
One Study Has Thoughts
A study from Rutgers University proposes that even a “limited” nuclear exchange would have drastic consequences for the human race.
For example, a limited exchange between India and Pakistan, the study found, has the potential to decimate global food supplies, leading to rampant death worldwide. The Rutgers team found that such an exchange, involving less than 3% of the world’s stockpiles, could kill a third of the world’s population in just two years.
And a large-scale nuclear exchange, something between the US and Russia? That could wipe out three-fourths of the world’s population, again, in just two years.
“It’s really a cautionary tale that any use of nuclear weapons could be a catastrophe for the world,” the study’s author, Rutgers climate scientist Alan Robock, said.
Nuclear War Means Earth Is Changed Forever
Robock’s study was the first to closely consider the disruption nuclear war would cause to the climate and to food supplies. The results were harrowing. If even a handful of the world’s several thousand nuclear weapons were detonated, massive firestorms would result. The firestorms would kick up soot. The soot would block the sun. With sunlight blocked, the atmosphere would cool. The cooling of the atmosphere would impact everything from crop production to fish harvesting. The result: a nuclear exchange, which killed tens of millions in the immediate war zone, would eventually lead to hundreds of millions of deaths, worldwide, from starvation.
“In my opinion,” Robock said, “our work is an existential threat to nuclear weapons – it shows you can’t use nuclear weapons. If you use them, you’re like a suicide bomber. You’re trying to attack somebody else but you’ll die of starvation.”
India and Pakistan: Biggest Nuclear Challenge
Robock’s team paid special attention to the consequences of a nuclear exchange between India and Pakistan – for, despite the saber-rattling between the US and Russia, India and Pakistan, who share a border, contested territory, and comparable nuclear arsenals, remain the most likely nations to engage in nuclear war.
If the two countries targeted one another’s urban centers with nuclear weapons, Robock’s study found that explosions, fires, and radiation would kill 127 million people in South Asia; 37 million metric tons of soot would be kicked into the atmosphere; global temperatures would plunge by more than 5 degrees Celsius – to levels not experienced since the last Ice Age. The temperature drop would destroy food production, so much so that “calories available from major crops and fisheries” would fall “by up to 42%,” resulting in a famine that would kill over 2 billion people worldwide.
5 Billion Dead in a U.S.-Russia Nuclear War
An exchange between the US and Russia, while less likely, would be more catastrophic: an estimated 5 billion people would die worldwide – perhaps as many as 6.7 billion at the higher end of the estimates.
“But any of the nine nuclear-armed nations, which also include China, North Korea, France, Israel and the United Kingdom, have enough firepower at their fingertips to cause immense worldwide suffering and death, with soot rising into the sky and touching off a domino effect of catastrophic cooling and famine,” Alex Wigglesworth reported for the LA Times.
While Robock’s study is unlikely to be perfectly precise – the takeaway is obvious: nuclear war will have ramifications that extend far beyond the initial detonation, potentially to the point of endangering human existence.
Harrison Kass is the Senior Defense Editor at 19FortyFive. An attorney, pilot, guitarist, and minor pro hockey player, he joined the US Air Force as a Pilot Trainee but was medically discharged. Harrison holds a BA from Lake Forest College, a JD from the University of Oregon, and an MA from New York University. He lives in Oregon and listens to Dokken. Follow him on Twitter @harrison_kass.
October 15, 2022 at 6:44 pm
The USA needs to do two things: increase and modernize our nuclear capability. If our enemies think they can destroy us with acceptable losees, they will.
And complete Reagan’s vision of a strategic defense initiative. Stupid Democrats are halfway Marxists anyway, and are the surrender party, and don’t want America to defend itself. They stupidly opposed SDO, and still do. Screw ’em.
I hope one day America wises up, grows up, and elects solid, permanent, Patriotic, Republicans to all three branches.
No more Democrats, no more RINOs. Republicans are the honest, adult party. Democrats are the evil party
December 11, 2022 at 9:32 am
Many psychics are predicting ww3 in 2023, or a major invasion or a massive solar event.
Whatever it is, it will bring lots of deaths and suffering.
But the chief cause of the coming 2023 disaster is the destiny chosen by the deep state when it rigged the November 2020 Presidential contest and allowed dementia joe to become president.
Joe is going or heading to the pearly gates and surely will have lots of company on his journey. In 2023.
December 11, 2022 at 3:54 pm
i have a few thoughts.
– the world is grossly overpopulated, for the way present society utilizes the planet’s limited resources. the earth would have to be 1.6 times its present size to be able to sustain the damage we do to it in a single year, razing native wildlife and extracting resources. and, the effects are cumulative, year after year – it’s not just a one-time insult.
– if humanity can’t figure out how to stop defiling its own nest by itself, mother nature will do it for us, and she will take no prisoners. and the suffering will be shared by those deserving and undeserving, alike. nuclear war could be one of many ways this could happen – the stress levels of any species lead to aberrations in behavior, which is clearly already happening; human beings think we’re special, but we’re not – the same rules of nature apply to us as to any other species. nuclear war could be one of many alternative result possibilities. climate change, pandemics, increased worldwide violence and rise in autocracies everywhere, are symptoms. (overthrow the us constitution, anyone?)
– regarding who’d be the first to use it, forget pakistan/india, usa/russia. i think it would be israel – total fanatical zealots rule that country.
“because if it’s not love, then it’s the bomb that will bring us together” – morrissey/marr; the smiths
December 11, 2022 at 8:54 pm
comments like scottfs’s and pagar’s above, are perfect examples of what i mean when i talk about society unraveling at the seams, defiling its own nest. their comments are completely deluded, filled with lies, disinformation and totally irrational thought. and this is not an opinion, it’s a plain straightforward fact.