A proposal by centrist Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) to reinstate the Senate’s dress code has sparked a heated debate within Capitol Hill. The move comes after Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) relaxed the dress code, allowing senators to wear more casual attire on the Senate floor.
Calls To Reinstate Dress Code Amid Cross-party Criticism
The proposal being circulated by Sen. Manchin seeks to reestablish the Senate’s previous dress code standards, which required senators to wear coats, ties, or business attire while on the Senate floor. One senator familiar with the resolution stated that it aims to define the dress code and essentially return to what it was before Schumer’s recent change.
Schumer’s decision to ease the dress code was seen by many as an attempt to accommodate the preferences of first-term Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pa.), known for his signature hoodie and shorts. However, the move has faced bipartisan pushback. Senate Democratic Whip Dick Durbin (Ill.) expressed his belief that the Senate should maintain certain standards when it comes to attire on the Senate floor. Durbin emphasized the need for the Senate to act on this matter.
“Coalition of the Rational”
Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) referred to the group of senators advocating for restoring the dress code as “the coalition of the rational.” He criticized the idea of conforming the dress code to the lowest common denominator and argued for the need to maintain dress code standards. Cornyn predicted that a Senate resolution on this issue would allow senators to express their views on the necessity of a dress code.
Dress Codes-Pros & Cons
Dress codes in the Senate, like in many formal institutions and workplaces, have been subject to fiery disagreement.
Arguments for enforcing a dress code include the following:
- Professionalism and Respect for the Institution: Advocates for dress codes often argue that a formal dress code promotes a sense of professionalism and respect for the institution. The Senate is a revered and formal space, and adhering to a dress code is seen as a way to honor the significance and gravity of the work conducted within.
- Establishing a Standard of Appearance: A dress code helps set a clear standard for how individuals should present themselves in the Senate. This standard ensures a consistent and appropriate level of attire, projecting a unified and organized image of the institution.
- Symbol of Authority and Tradition: Some view a dress code as a symbol of authority, tradition, and the continuity of established norms. Maintaining a formal dress code can be seen as preserving the legacy and history of the Senate.
- Enhancing Credibility and Dignity: Formal attire is often associated with credibility and dignity. Supporters argue that adhering to a dress code enhances the credibility of the Senate and its members, promoting a serious and authoritative image.
- Fostering Focus and Seriousness: Dressing in a formal and appropriate manner is believed to help individuals stay focused and maintain a serious mindset while engaging in important discussions and decision-making within the Senate.
Reasons why dress codes in the Senate are not viewed as important by some:
- Personal Freedom and Expression: Critics argue that dress codes restrict personal freedom and self-expression. They believe individuals should have the autonomy to choose their attire based on their comfort, personal style, and cultural or religious beliefs.
- Modernization and Adaptation: Opponents of dress codes may advocate for a more modern and adaptive approach, arguing that strict dress codes are outdated and should evolve to reflect changing societal norms and attitudes towards clothing.
- Focus on Substance Over Appearance: Some argue that the focus in a professional setting like the Senate should be on the substance of the work and the quality of the ideas being discussed, rather than the outward appearance of individuals.
- Inclusivity and Diversity: Critics often point out that traditional dress codes may not be inclusive or sensitive to the diverse cultural backgrounds and personal preferences of individuals within the Senate. A more flexible approach to attire may be seen as more inclusive and accommodating.
- Cost and Accessibility: For some, formal attire can be costly and inaccessible, particularly for those with limited financial means. A relaxed dress code is seen as a more equitable approach that doesn’t place an additional financial burden on individuals.
Debate on Senate Fashion
The debate over the Senate dress code is expected to continue as senators weigh in on the proposed reinstatement of the dress code standards. The disagreement reflects differing views on the appropriate attire for senators while conducting official business on the Senate floor.
Georgia Gilholy is a journalist based in the United Kingdom who has been published in Newsweek, The Times of Israel, and the Spectator. Gilholy writes about international politics, culture, and education.
From the Vault