Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Smart Bombs: Military, Defense and National Security

China’s Mysterious J-XX: An Aircraft Carrier Fighter for the Future?

J-XX From China
J-XX From China. Image Credit: Social Media Screenshot.

Key Points and Summary: China’s J-XX fighter prototype, developed by Shenyang Aircraft, offers a glimpse into the future of Chinese air combat.

-Smaller than the J-36, the J-XX appears to be a multi-role stealth fighter optimized for carrier operations, with design features like a tailless wing, advanced control surfaces, and possible full-vectoring engines.

-The narrow engine tunnel and potential for automated carrier landings suggest technological experimentation, while the aircraft’s low-profile canopy hints at enhanced stealth.

-Although still in early development, the J-XX complements China’s air combat ambitions, reinforcing its strategy to rival U.S. and NATO air superiority in contested environments.

Is the J-XX the Next Step in China’s Carrier Fighter Evolution?

Chengdu Aircraft Industry Group’s J-36 scooped up most of the publicity around China’s late-December revelations, but a second combat type, one from Shenyang Aircraft and referred to for now as J-XX, was revealed at the same time.

It was smaller, and the pictures of it were less clear, so it got some attention. But it deserves plenty, as the other half of an unprecedented double revelation and a complementary part of China’s future air combat system.

Observation of the design reveals that it’s very much a standard-size fighter with a pilot. There are good hints that it’s intended for shipboard operation, though that would not stop it from also equipping the air force.

Since China already has a new naval fighter in the works, the J-XX may be at a very early stage of development. What we saw could have been not a prototype, an aircraft close in design to the intended production version, but a technology demonstrator, which would look like the real thing but lack many features.

The content and style of the two disclosures is no accident, because there are no such accidents in China. There were more and better pictures of the J-36, suggesting that the authorities want more attention for the Chengdu aircraft from their target audiences. One of the audiences is the Chinese population, to be reassured that China is disputing the lead with the United States; another may be the US itself, with a new administration that might be tempted to respond with disclosures of its own, to China’s benefit.

The J-XX appears to be closer to a classic large-fighter size—25 tonnes gross weight, similar to the Eurofighter Typhoon—than the J-36, which has the size of a medium bomber. The J-XX certainly cannot accommodate anything like the J-36’s impressively large main weapon bay and respectably large secondary bays. It is not a competitor or alternative to the J-36.

The J-XX has no vertical tails. Some observers saw, in the first pictures to appear, articulated V-tails that could fold flat in straight and level flight and move into a raised position for takeoff and landing and maneuvering flight; later images, however, showed a tailless lambda wing shape, with a highly swept and blended inner section and less swept, tapered outer panels. The planform resembles many notional designs for next-generation fighters seen in the US and elsewhere since the 2010s.

As on the J-36, the trailing edge incorporates multiple moving control surface panels, and the outer segments are likely split in the same way to act as rudders and speedbrakes. The inner half of the trailing edge is swept sharply forward, moving the control surface further aft to make it more effective in pitch. The exhaust nozzles are laterally separated and extend beyond the structure (unlike the J-36’s nozzles), so full vectoring is both possible and likely, and can add to control in pitch, roll, and yaw.

The engines are apparently separated by a narrow tunnel—a very unusual design feature. Unlike the widely separated engines on the MiG-29 and the Sukhoi Flanker family, they are too close together to accommodate stores between them. The narrow passage is a mystery because it seems to make little sense in terms of aerodynamics, signatures or vehicle packaging: it would appear more logical to fill the space in and use it for fuel.

The undersides of the engine housings are flattened, suggesting that a future version might have shallow weapon bays there. The rest of the shape does not offer any obvious bay locations: the main landing gear bays occupy the strategic terrain on the body sides.

The canopy seems to have a low profile, so low that some people thought the J-XX was uncrewed. But it does have a pilot, at least: there is very little logic to building a drone with two engines, adding weight and complication when there is no concern about losing someone onboard due to an engine failure.

What does this add up to? The tell-tale features may be the large pitch control surfaces and the location of the break line on the trailing edge. The first provides the pitch control authority needed for carrier landings and the second accommodates a wing fold.

Shenyang has been responsible for both of China’s carrier fighters—the Sukhoi-derived J-15 family and the new J-35—and therefore owns China’s expertise in this specialised and challenging area.

The J-35 is still under development, so if the J-XX is a follow-on carrier fighter, production may be some years off. If the aircraft is an early-stage technology demonstrator, that might explain some of the design details.

One is intriguing if this is a carrier jet: the nose is quite long and, as noted, the cockpit is low. As a near-delta with no canard wings, the J-XX will point high when flying slowly for landing. So the pilot will see little of the flight deck that he or she is approaching. But Northrop Grumman demonstrated fully automatic carrier landing in 2013 with the X-47B, which achieved much better consistency in touchdown point than is normal for navy fighters.

Applied to a crewed combat aircraft, autoland would eliminate many training cycles and reduce the number of heavy landings, allowing a lighter airframe and landing gear and reducing operational costs. The Chinese navy, too, would not face the same cultural challenges in making that change that would inhibit the US Navy. The idea is speculative, but it would help explain an early start to a demonstration program.

China’s New Stealth Fighters: A Story in Photos

China J-36 Fighter

China J-36 Fighter. X Screenshot.

J-36 from China

J-36 from China. Screenshot for Chinese Social Media.

China J-35 Fighter

China J-35 Fighter. Image Credit: Creative Commons.

NGAD White Emperor Fighter Plane from China

Chinese NGAD White Emperor Fighter Plane from China. Image Credit: X Screenshot.

China New Stealth Plane

China New Stealth Plane.. Image Credit: X Screenshot.

China Sixth-Generation Fighter NGAD

China Sixth-Generation Fighter NGAD. Image Credit: Social Media Screenshot.

China 6th Generation Fighter 2024

China 6th Generation Fighter. Image Credit: Social Media Screenshot.

6th Generation Fighter from China

6th Generation Fighter from China mockup via social media.

About the Author:  Bill Sweetman 

Bill Sweetman is a veteran, award-winning journalist and aerospace industry executive. He is the author of Trillion Dollar Trainwreck: How the F-35 hollowed out the US Air Force. This first appeared in ASPI’s The Strategist. 

Written By

Bill Sweetman is a veteran, award-winning journalist and aerospace industry executive. He is the author of Trillion Dollar Trainwreck: How the F-35 hollowed out the US Air Force. This article has been updated to show a complete quoted sentence from General David W Allvin.

1 Comment

1 Comment

  1. bobb

    January 17, 2025 at 6:55 pm

    Naval fighters have very limited usefulness especially if they are slated to operate from aircraft carriers.

    China should turn or transform the currently PLANAF into the PLNAF.

    Which means a vast majority of its aircraft are land-based and only a very smaller number are found operating at sea.

    Fighter jets need to be based far inland for safety, just like rocket launching sites.

    That means lots of heavy fighters which are not ideal for sea operations.

    The future lies with large fighters equipped with photonic radars and ultra long-range air-to-air missiles.

    Such expensive jets can’t be based on aircraft carriers.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Advertisement