Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Trillions - 19FortyFive

Donald Trump’s ‘Tariffs on Steroids’ Approach Could Mean a Recession

President Donald Trump
President Donald Trump speaks at the Conservative Political Action Conference at the Gaylord National Resort & Convention Center in Oxon Hill, Maryland, on Saturday, February 22, 2025. (Official White House Photo by Molly Riley.

Trump’s Tariffs Look Like a Giant Mistake: It was said of the Habsburgs that they learnt nothing and forgot nothing. Something similar might be said of President Trump when it comes to trade policy.

Donald Trump Is Going All In on Tariffs 

Having learnt nothing from the failure of his policies during his first term to prevent the widening of the trade deficit in office, Mr. Trump is now proposing more of the same economic policy mix.

Except this time, he is doing those policies on steroids.

This is likely to compound the Federal Reserve’s task in regaining inflation control. Worse yet, it threatens to send an already struggling world economy into a recession in a manner that could come back to our shores.  

That in turn could lead to a Republican shellacking in the 2026 mid-term election.

The Tariff Strategy Explained 

The two main components of economic policy during the first Trump administration were the increased resort to import tariffs and a major tax cut.

Import tariffs of between 10 and 20 percent were imposed on around $350 billion of imports from China as well as on steel and aluminum imports.

At the same time, the Tax Cut and Jobs Act made a major cut in the corporate tax rate. The Congressional Budget Office estimated that those tax cuts would add around $1.5 trillion to the budget deficit over the next decade.

Despite higher tariffs, far from narrowing, during Mr. Trump’s first term the trade deficit of goods and services increased by some 40 percent from $480 billion in 2016 to $680 billion in 2019. It did so because the large tax cuts had the effect of both lowering the country’s savings rate by increasing the budget deficit and of increasing the country’s investment rate by incentivizing investment through tax cuts.

The key lesson that Mr. Trump should have learned in his first term was that a country’s trade deficit is determined by its savings-investment balance and not by the level of its import tariffs. So long as a country saves less than it invests, it will record a trade deficit no matter how high its tariff wall might be.

Donald Trump Just Didn’t Learn 

It would be an understatement to say that Mr. Trump is now proposing a more aggressive policy mix of import tariff hikes and tax cuts than he did in his first term.

Last month, he imposed a 10 percent tariff on all imports from China and a 25 percent tariff on all steel and aluminum imports. Yesterday, he announced that next week, the import tariff on China will be raised to 20 percent, and a 25 percent tariff will be levied on Canada and Mexico, our two largest trade partners.

In addition, Europe has been put on notice that it is next in line for a 25 percent tariff, while all our trade partners have been threatened with reciprocal tariffs if they run large bilateral trade surpluses with us.

On the tax cut front, Mr. Trump is now proposing an extension of the 2017 Tax Cut and Jobs Act and eliminating income taxes on Social Security benefits and tips. According to the Committee for a Responsible Budget, over the next decade Mr. Trump’s tax cuts could add over $4 trillion to the budget deficit that is already running as high as 6 ½ percent of GDP.

Trump Could Made the Debt Worse 

We have to expect that in the same way that the widening of the budget deficit contributed to a worsening in the trade deficit in the first Trump term, it will do so again in the second term.

We also have to expect that at a time when inflation is still running above the Fed’s 2 percent inflation target, the tariff hikes could add almost 1 percentage point to inflation. That in turn could cause the Fed to be wary about resuming its interest rate cutting cycle.

Worse yet, we have to be concerned that Mr. Trump’s tariff hikes will tip an already struggling global economy into recession. China, the world’s second largest economy is presently in the midst of the bursting of its massive housing and credit market bubble.

For its part, Germany, Europe’s largest economy, has now been in recession for two years and is beset by political polarization. The last thing that an export-intensive Chinese and German economy now need is a shock to their export sectors.

Needless to add, closer to home, the Canadian and Mexican economies, which are so closely integrated with our economy, must also be expected to succumb to recessions.

Mr. Tariff Man 

It would be fanciful to think that our economy would not be adversely impacted by economic developments abroad. The more than likely retaliation by our trade partners with trade measures of their own would hit our export sector hard.

At the same time, loan problems abroad could add strains to our financial system which is already having to cope with large commercial real estate lending losses. A recession abroad will also hardly be good news for our stock market since the S&P 500 companies derive almost 30 percent of their profits from their overseas operations.

By Gage Skidmore: Donald Trump speaking to supporters at an immigration policy speech at the Phoenix Convention Center in Phoenix, Arizona.

Donald Trump speaking to supporters at an immigration policy speech at the Phoenix Convention Center in Phoenix, Arizona.

For all of these reasons, we have to hope that Mr. Trump makes a trade policy U-turn soon. Unfortunately, all the clues are pointing in the direction of Mr. Trump doing everything that might be expected from somebody who likes being referred to as “Mr. Tariff Man”.

About the Author: Dr. Desmond Lachman 

American Enterprise Institute senior fellow Desmond Lachman was a deputy director in the International Monetary Fund’s Policy Development and Review Department and the chief emerging-market economic strategist at Salomon Smith Barney. 

Written By

Desmond Lachman joined AEI after serving as a managing director and chief emerging market economic strategist at Salomon Smith Barney. He previously served as deputy director in the International Monetary Fund’s (IMF) Policy Development and Review Department and was active in staff formulation of IMF policies. Mr. Lachman has written extensively on the global economic crisis, the U.S. housing market bust, the U.S. dollar, and the strains in the euro area. At AEI, Mr. Lachman is focused on the global macroeconomy, global currency issues, and multilateral lending agencies.

7 Comments

7 Comments

  1. pagar

    February 28, 2025 at 9:46 am

    Good times don’t last forever, as plaque or dross of all types quickly begins to build up in undesirable quantities.

    Thus sometimes, a good shake-out or an effective bout of abstinence is highly recommended.

    That’s what trump the doctor is doling out. Right now, in 2025.

    The coming or announced more tariffs on china is a case in point.

    China has screwed the US for oceans & oceans of greenbacks, and what does xi jinping do with his mountains of cash.

    He doles out massive bribes and grease money to foreigners.

    A recent reuters report accused china of bribing local police in manila to allow alleged spies to operate freely.

    While Reuters is a shady global media outlet widely known for its links to US state dept and US intelligence agencies, and even the renouned DoD (according to musk), the story can’t just be ignored altogether.

    There was another recent case where authorities uncovered a truly massive e-waste operation that was backed by state capital (from china govt), with huge bribes paid to local officials to allow a very large number of illegal e-waste sites to operate unhindered.

    Thus trump’s tariffs are like strong medicine from the family doctor.

  2. The Al U know

    February 28, 2025 at 10:20 am

    What else does he, Donald Trump, do?

    Complete deregulation?
    Canada had for example duties measuring 25%, even there after the last trade agreement.
    And, we have wheat control boards and dairy conglomerates to protect those farmers in Quebec.

    There is no getting through without more pain.

    Cut Costs?
    The US debt stands at $36 trillion, Elon Musk’s cutting measures may only save $1 trillion.
    This is the elephant in the room.

    A Leftist approach?
    Then there are what the left, who are in disarray, want to do.

    Tax the Rich/’capital gains tax’
    Universal Basic Income(well here in Canada),
    Reformulated Carbon Tax/Green New Deal

    On this last point, the assumption is that the period of fossil fuelled growth was over, and it was time to take the hit for climate.

    Russia,India, BRICS, OPEC begged to differ.
    China, they built mountain ranges of solar panels, but did not relent on it’s cheap goods, coal plant production.

    @Pagar, you and I are on the same page about the good times not lasting forever.

    In, short the options are not good, the world is still riding the wave of Globalization started post Cold War.

    -The Al U Know

  3. The Al U know

    February 28, 2025 at 10:29 am

    Oh, on Canada. We are pretty protectionist. Opening ourselves up to some American investment might not be such a bad idea, in certain areas.

    The Liberal leader in contention, PM in waiting in Trudeau’s shadow, tells the province of British Columbia he’s building a pipeline, then reassures Quebec there’s going to be none built.

    -The Al U Know

  4. Jim

    February 28, 2025 at 12:33 pm

    Why, after World War Two, did the United States reverse 150 years of tariff policy which was a source revenue and protecting domestic manufacturers?

    Because the rest of the World’s manufacturing had been devastated by war (sans the Soviet’s). There was also the struggle against Communism.

    We wanted to encourage free market capitalism, the profit and loss system of open markets where prices are set by the sellers and buyers, themselves, and demand and supply are allocated by market forces… instead of the Communist dictate from a central authority in a grand “central plan” of people who supposedly knew better than the market on allocating resources.

    So, throw open our markets because we wanted to encourage the rebuilding of Europe and that included manufacturing… plus, discourage Communist movements in Western Europe, which after the war, was a real concern.

    Japan had been devastated by the war, while there was little danger of Communism, itself, taking over because the Japanese were little tempted by the supposed benefits of Communism, there was a need for a physical “aircraft carrier” off the Eurasian Landmass that could not be sunk… a bulwark, and ally, for American power in North East Asia.

    We wanted to see Japan recover from the war, and, just to make sure, not tempted by Communism… there was a small Communist faction in Japan… which for all intents & purposes has now died out as viable.

    So, to fight Communism and revive war-torn countries, the United States had an open door policy… and, we turned a blind eye to all kinds of state-supported subsidies (and tax schemes) of manufacturing that gave foreign countries’ a competitive advantage, here, in the United States.

    So, there was ideological & geopolitical reasons to encourage imports from our friends around the World… and, as an example to others of the benefits of liberal democracy, free market capitalism.

    Those concerns and dynamics don’t apply anymore.

    Communism, as a World force, is done. Nobody, save, some dead-end Communist nations, Cuba and North Korea, come to mind. (Communist China, today, is really a centralized state power, fascist, government, with a mixed economy of state-owned businesses and private business, but overall responding to government dictate… if the Communists so choose.)

    So, at this time and place, we need a new policy on tariffs… Trump is doing a long delayed service to American workers (they should not have to compete with labor arbitrage from Asian near-slave labor wage sources).

    I’m tired of the U. S. being a chump on trade because of no longer relevant geopolitical and ideological imperatives after World War Two.

    I’m sure there will be some hiccups along the way, there always is when turning to a new policy.

    Minimize those hiccups and lets move on from Post World War Two policies, no longer relevant.

    The author is wrong… he’s stuck in yesterday’s World… time to catch up to reality.

  5. Jim

    February 28, 2025 at 2:36 pm

    Addendum: the Soviets also suffered manufacturing destruction in the Western regions and Southern regions (Nova Russia [Ukraine]) of the Soviet Union, but much manufacturing capacity was moved east of the Ural mountain range, that’s what I read in college, at any rate.

    The concept of reciprocal trade agreements is very important, as Trump has stated one of his objectives is to have reciprocal agreements where each party (nation) is held to the same tax and import tariff schedules. Another way to think about it is as “mirror” tax & tariff schedules.

    But Trump has added an additional concept; the American market is a ‘premium market’ for foreign producers to have access to. There is truth in the idea because the American market is the biggest and has the most buying power.

    In other words, foreign manufacturers can get the best price for their products & services because consumers in America can pay higher prices than in other countries with less buying power in the consumer and wholesale markets.

    And, let’s bring manufacturing home to America for American workers. For far too long, domestic manufacturers were encouraged to “off shore” production to take advantage of “cheap labor” in foreign lands, as our government’s quasi-official policy. As another type of labor arbitrage contrary to the interest of the American worker.

    No more.

  6. bobb

    February 28, 2025 at 2:54 pm

    We are silently tiptoeing on or near the edge of ww3

    What’s that.

    Just hours ago, herr zelenskyy verbally engaged trump the US president in a heated explosive argument which caused him (the leader of euro neo-nazis) to storm out of the white house, according to NYT.

    The top EU leaders like macron, starmer and merz are watching with glee, and hoping zelenskyy will return to Europe and decide to accept European military assistance in donbass.

    It is done, finished. It’s gonna be ww3 in Europe in 2025.

  7. JingleBells

    February 28, 2025 at 5:56 pm

    US president trump slammed zelenskyy as a disrespectful person and accused the ukro boss of wanting to gamble with the lives of millions of people after zelenskyy attempted to lecture JD Vance on Russia.

    Vance hit back at zelenskyy and trump called him disrespectful and having no cards in his hand.

    Zelenskyy shot back and said he wasn’t into playing a game of cards and soon everything descended into chaos.

    Thus, don’t worry about any recession, remember instead to start STOCKING UP YOUR LARDER.

    Keep enough stocks of daily necessities today before the crowds at walmart erupt into chaos.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Advertisement