Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Smart Bombs: Military, Defense and National Security

What If China Launched a Surprise Attack on the U.S. Military?

U.S. Marines with Marine Fighter Attack Training Squadron (VMFAT) 101, Marine Fighter Attack Squadron (VMFA) 232 and Marine Fighter Attack Squadron (VMFA) 211, 3rd Marine Aircraft Wing (3rd MAW) conduct a missile shooting demonstration and aerial refueling in support of Exercise Winter Fury 21, off the coast of Southern California, Feb. 5, 2021. During Winter Fury, 3rd MAW will conduct long range strikes, deploy and support infantry Marines, assist in the transport of artillery assets, and provide logistical support to Marines on the ground. (U.S. Marine Corps photo by Cpl. Leilani Cervantes)

Editor’s Note: This is part one of a two-part series. You can read part two here.

In recent years there has been an increase in the saber-rattling from Beijing regarding their willingness to use force to reunify Taiwan with the mainland. There has been a concurrent rise in the willingness – and in some cases eagerness – of various advocates in Washington to extend security guarantees to Taipei to thwart Chinese ambitions.

A sober analysis of the geographic and military realities at play in the Taiwan scenario, however, reveals that if America went to war with China to stop the invasion, we would not only fail to prevent Taiwan’s capture, but could suffer such egregious losses that our position as the preeminent global superpower would be permanently lost.

For decades Americans have been told by their leaders that the U.S. Armed Forces are the “greatest military in the history of the world.” It is common knowledge that we spend more on defense than the next 10 world powers combined. The unquestioned implication in the minds of most American leaders and people is that the U.S. military is invincible.

Yes, as some generals have said, the cost to win could be more or less, depending on levels of readiness, but there is virtual unanimity on the belief that we would eventually win any major war, regardless of the foe. That is a badly misplaced and inaccurate belief. There are indeed some scenarios that would make defeat likely. Intervening in a fight between China and Taiwan is one of them.

The following is a depiction of how a fight between the United States and China might unfold if China were to Taiwan and we entered the conflict on Taipei’s side. It does not address the likelihood that China will attack nor look at the conditions that might spark such a war. Yet it does examine how such a fight would likely unfold, given the doctrines, force sizes, and level of readiness each side would possess.

The Road to War (the real situation)

The conditions currently prevailing in real life in the Indo-Pacific are almost indistinguishable from what might be expected in the early stages of a march to war. Last month for example, General Xu Qiliang, vice-chairman of Central Military Commission (CMC) and China’s highest-ranking general, addressed his country’s legislature. “Faced with the ‘Thucydides trap,’” General Xu said, “the military needs to speed up efforts to raise its capabilities.” ‘Thucydides’ Trap’ refers to an ancient military war (Peloponnesian War) between an established power and a rising power, and has been used to cite the risk of “inevitable” war between similar dynamics, like the established U.S. and rising China.

Added Chinese Defense Minister Wei Fenghe, “China’s national security has entered a high-risk period,” he said, and urgently required the further development of the military. President Xi Jinping charged his military not to have general readiness, but to “put all (their) minds and energy on preparing for war.” Chinese leaders, however, aren’t the only ones preparing for action.

Adm. John Aquilino, commander of the U.S. Pacific Fleet, told a Senate panel in late March that Beijing considers annexing Taiwan as its “number one priority.” Aquilino said he believed the possibility of a Chinese invasion, “is much closer to us than most think, and we have to take this on.” Senator Tom Cotton went further, saying he believed, “the time has come to be clear: Replace strategic ambiguity with strategic clarity that the United States will come to the aid of Taiwan if China was to forcefully invade.”

China has not only been on a multi-decade military expansion, but in recent years has militarized numerous natural and man-made islands in the South China Sea. It has increased the number and frequency of sending fighter aircraft near and into the airspace of Taiwan, and warships in an around Taiwanese waters.

Countering these moves, the United States has drastically increased its freedom of navigation operations into waters near the Chinese coast, accelerated the number of American war planes in the air near Chinese airspace, and have established new military bases in the region. Further, the commander of Indo-PACOM has requested an additional $27 billion from Congress to further build military capacity to oppose China.

China’s Calculations (the scenario)

Based on historical desires to reclaim Taiwan and convinced that America would eventually have enough combat power in the Western Pacific to prevent a military takeover of Taiwan, Xi and the CMC make the decision to attack Taiwan. Knowing that U.S. Admiral Philip Davidson believes that China would need up to six more years to be ready for the attack, Xi calculated that the Americans therefore did not believe an attack would happen in the near term and he could thus could catch the U.S. flat-footed with a surprise attack.

There are a considerable number of variables and levels of risk that China could take in regard to launching a surprise attack against the United States, but Xi took the one that offered the best chance of producing a knockout blow. He knew that the comprehensive power of the U.S. and its allies was stronger than China and thus the longer a war would take, the greater his chances of losing. Xi concluded that China’s best hope lie in a quick, decisive victory.

America is a global superpower, with more than 800 bases arrayed around the world. Most of its considerable combat power is stationed in Europe and the Middle East, and most of it is currently manned and equipped for peacetime operations. To have the ability to engage in sustained, major combat operations, U.S. Forces would require many months of buildup, as happened prior to Desert Storm and Operation Iraqi Freedom. Xi vowed he would not make the same mistake as Saddam Hussein and give the Americans time to prepare.

Moreover, Xi knew that America relies on high tech weaponry that is extremely expensive per unit. It can take years to replace combat losses, as it would take years to convert to wartime manufacturing, and years more to complete production of some U.S. warships and planes – while China built its war-making industry to make replacements faster. In short, Xi calculated that his best chance of winning a war against the United States would be a no-notice, shock attack that took out key U.S. assets at the outset.

The Opening Salvo

Xi and the CMC leaders anguished over whether to attack U.S. targets in Japan and South Korea. It was important to cripple the U.S. fleets quickly, but that could not come at the cost of expanding the war to America’s allies in the region. As long as the fight could be limited to America and China, Xi calculated the chances of winning were promising.

He judged that South Korea would not allow U.S. combat operations against China to take place from their air and naval bases. As soon as the attack started he would tell Seoul that his beef was not against South Korea and that he would refrain from attacking any facilities in South Korea so long as America didn’t attack Chinese troops from there – and he would guarantee that North Korea would not take advantage of the chaos and attack south so long as Seoul stayed out of the fight. Japan was a different matter.

There are two American bases on Japanese soil that were too important to leave to chance, Kadena Air Base on Okinawa and Sasebo Naval Base in southwest Japan. Kadena is a major hub for fighter planes, but mainly for air refueling tankers in the region. If the U.S. were to lose the ability to refuel its aircraft from Kadena, it would severely limit America’s ability to engage in sufficient numbers in the air over Taiwan. Sasebo Naval Base is a forward base for the U.S. Seventh Fleet. Without the use of Japan-based naval bases, the U.S. Navy would be forced to run its operations from 1,000 miles further away.

Xi therefore decided to take the risk of knocking out the two bases in a shock missile and air attack that would commence simultaneously with the initiating of the attack on Taiwan (for a full description of how that part of the attack would be conducted, read my previous work on 19FortyFive). American planes would be destroyed on the ground and ships picked off from their docks. Ammunition supplies, fuel depots, and spare parts warehouses would all be destroyed at Kadena and Sasebo.

In a shrewd attempt to avoid having Japan go to war with the U.S. against China, Xi personally called the Japanese Prime Minister 30 minutes prior to the attack and told him “it would be a good idea” if he immediately ordered all Japanese personnel out of specified buildings. This would give credence to the Chinese argument that they had neither the intent nor desire to fight Japan, but exclusively to engage the American assets that Xi felt most threatened China’s operation to reunify Taiwan.

China had already calculated that even if Japan didn’t take the offer and did fight back, it would still be a risk worth taking. But Beijing knew just as well as Tokyo that Japan was not in a position to engage in sustained combat operations and if it chose to fight back against the side that was fully prepared, the Japanese military would suffer egregious harm.

In the end, with great regret and embarrassment, Tokyo informed Washington that it would not be able to enter the fight; the cost would simply be too great and the chances of success too low. President Biden would soon face a decision as anguishing and fraught with risk as any American president has ever had to make.

Unlike at Pearl Harbor in December 1941, American naval and air power in the Pacific could not be rapidly rebuilt after a surprise attack. Depending on what China chose to do next, how the rest of our allies would respond, and what the president chose to do, the American security situation could go from bad to worse (possibly much worse) – or we could limit the damage, retain our position of global power, and live to fight another day. The stakes in that moment couldn’t have been higher.

Daniel L. Davis is a Senior Fellow for Defense Priorities and a former Lt. Col. in the U.S. Army who deployed into combat zones four times. He is the author of “The Eleventh Hour in 2020 America.” Follow him @DanielLDavis1.

Written By

Daniel L. Davis is a Senior Fellow for Defense Priorities and a former Lt. Col. in the U.S. Army who deployed into combat zones four times. He is the author of “The Eleventh Hour in 2020 America.” Follow him @DanielLDavis1.



  1. Rick

    April 5, 2021 at 11:42 am

    We are almost within the perfect storm of ineptness regarding our military and its capabilities. From the so-called “CinC” to the SecDef to the JCs we face increased loss of capability because they fail to place the United States first and foremost. This is going to come back to haunt us and it will result in huge losses of life for which not of those referred to or who fit the above will be held personally accountable.

  2. Rick

    April 5, 2021 at 11:43 am

    *not one*.

  3. Rich

    April 5, 2021 at 6:18 pm

    Parts one and two of this article refer to the quick and cogent response required by Joe Biden in the event of a Chinese attack. This isn’t to be partisan or even sparky. Does anyone believe President Biden, in his obvious state of cognitive decline, is capable of that?

  4. Jack Kennedy

    April 5, 2021 at 7:58 pm

    This is why China has partnered with the democrat party and been paying off chinajoe …. a fait accompli

  5. Jeff

    April 5, 2021 at 8:16 pm

    Biden would not even lift a finger to stop China & neither will Harris when she becomes President. China hs total free reign to do whatever they want whenever they want.

  6. Mudboy

    April 5, 2021 at 8:43 pm

    When adjusted for cost of living between countries, China is massively outspending the US on military power.

  7. Chauvin Emmons

    April 5, 2021 at 10:49 pm

    China already attacked the US and won our mitary could not defend it’s self it’s too busy ferriting out anyone with morals or a differing point of view.
    Ask Joe Biteme who paid for the fraudulent election.
    Does the big guy intend on paying any taxes on his pay-off to play lretend president obviously his kid is indignant where’s Pelosis boy in this treason.

  8. Old Sarge

    April 6, 2021 at 2:38 am

    If China strikes first, We should Glass Beijing (nuclear strike) and EMP (High Altitude Nuke Detonation) of southern Chinese base areas With CCP command and control destroyed, the Chinese military would quickly lose control of their personnel and permanently knock out the CCP.

  9. Randy Taylor

    April 6, 2021 at 5:58 am

    May already have happened. Who can stand to think COVID might have been intentionally loosed against the nations because pain of tarrifs was beginning to be felt? If so, America was taken down without a shot being fired.

  10. Joe Sloan

    April 6, 2021 at 8:29 am

    China controls too much of America’s supplies. They could cease to be a provider and stymie our ability to produce. China could attack our power grid and create chaos for military and civilian life. All this without firing a shot.

  11. BrianinTn

    April 6, 2021 at 1:19 pm

    Why does America always have to be kicked fist in a surprise attack in order to get it’s butt in gear?
    Perhaps we should, for once, take the preventative step of taking out all of China’s man-made islands in the disputed South China Sea, and then demand China formally recognize Taiwan or suffer complete destruction of it’s mainland military and electrical grid.
    I, for one, am tired of always having to play nice.

  12. AP

    April 7, 2021 at 6:51 pm

    We need to prepare a modified version of the Wuhan virus to take out the Chinese Army, if and when they invade Taiwan. A super contagious variant that mostly kills men but not women would work nicely.

  13. Greg Patterson

    April 7, 2021 at 8:21 pm

    China would have no answer to waves of LRASM’s launched from US based B-1’s and B-2’s and sub-based tomahawks sinking their capital ships from range. Sink China’s large surface combatants (including large amphibious transports) and there is no successful invasion.

  14. william.

    April 7, 2021 at 10:40 pm

    interesting theory. here’s mine..

    acting as manager of major american ports china has for years controlled what security inspects or doesn’t inspect given cargo containers.

    using this they have smuggled nuclear weapons into the usa. they have rented and bought houses in major usa cities (size, political or strategic importance,near major bases,etc).

    right before any war in tawain the chinese remote detonate the nukes. in one swoop america loses 20 major citie, most of its military might, and all of its political leadership.

    at the same time the chinese announce they were acting in self defense, manufacture a reason, ask the world to investigate and arbitrate, and the world pressures the usa to not respond. the crippled usa quasi reluctantly agreed as an astro turf campaign is launched.

    china wins. not a shot fired back at them.

  15. Edward A Kronholm

    April 8, 2021 at 12:34 am

    Look… the easiest path to averting this disaster and save countless dollars and lives is for the US to just GIVE Taiwan 15-20 nuclear warheads and a credible means to deliver them (missiles?). Would the Chinese be so willing to sacrifice 3-5 of their major cities like Bejing and Shanghai to control Taiwan? And yes, the Chinese COULD obliterate Taiwan in return… who wins then? See… easy peasy… and I did not even stay in a Holiday Inn last night… otherwise, Biden does not have the balls to confront China and Taiwan and the South Pacific will be lost. The US will be vastly diminished and China will become the ascendent world power with all that means. Bullies bully until someone punches them in the nose. Biden is not the one to do it… we are soooo screwed…

  16. Joseph DiProspero

    April 8, 2021 at 1:49 pm

    First, what is the chance that a Chinese first strike is even feasible. Is the US military so unprepared that our intelligence services would not detect an imminent Chinese attack, especially as the author envisions a scenario in which our allies are forewarned of the attack.
    Secondly, the author’s scenario posits enormous US casualties. What President would do nothing in the face of such an outrage? It is politically unimaginable that there would not have to be some kind of counter attack.
    Third, the US can employ the same strategy it did in Europe doing the Cold War. During this period NATO faced a very one-side Soviet conventional military advantage which we countered with the retaliatory threat of tactical nuclear weapons. Why should that threat not be on the table now. Certainly such weapons could easily destroy China’s invasion force.
    Fourth, how could the US allow the TSMC chip foundry fall into the hands of the Chinese when it is the principal global source of the most advanced semiconductor chips. At a minimum would would have to destroy these facilities and evacuate as many of TSMC’s engineers as possible.
    Finally, the risk of an escalation to cyber and/or nuclear warfare would be an imponderable that, even in the face of a continued US policy of strategic ambiguity, will serve as a meaningful deterrent. Replace that with an avowed policy of certain retaliation with ALL our military means and Xi would have to be in a truly desperate situation domestically before he’d likely risk the consequences of such an all out war.

  17. Bill Halcott

    April 12, 2021 at 8:36 am

    Our Asian allies? It’s the old problem: be the last to be eaten by the tiger/crocodile.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *