Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Uncategorized

Iowa-Class: The Legendary US Navy Battleship That Was Unstoppable

Battleship Iowa-class
USS Iowa Battleship. Image Credit: Creative Commons.

The US Navy built the Iowa-class battleships to help win World War II. While they certainly helped accomplish that, they ended up helping win the Cold War as well: While the United States Navy’s USS Iowa (BB-61) didn’t enter service until 1943, she and her sister battleships had their sights on the Imperial Japanese Navy before construction even began. In 1936, when there was every indication suggesting that the Empire of Japan would fail to ratify the London Navy Treaty, the United States Navy began the development of a new class of “fast battleships” to succeed the South Dakota-class battleships then under construction.

Due to the failure of the treaty, battleship displacement was increased to a limit of 45,000 tons. The American planners opted to use the increased tonnage for extra power and protection rather than for increased firepower and armament, which naval officials had considered to have reached an acceptable plateau. Another consideration was a warship that would have a maximum beam that would allow it to pass through the Panama Canal – and thus be readily able to operate in both the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans.

Major War Effort

In total, it took 3,432,000 man-hours – more than 206 years of draftsman hours – to complete the final design for the Iowa-class battleships. The total completed plans reportedly weighed 175 tons, 30 inches in width, and are 1,100 miles long when laid out.

Work on what was to become the warships began in early 1938 under the direction of Adm. Thomas C. Hart, head of the General Board, which followed the Battleship Design Advisory Board’s recommendation. At 860 feet long, the length of almost three football fields, the Iowa-class was 200 feet longer than the previous South Dakota-class. That allowed for additional space to be devoted to the ship’s engine, enabling the new class to be truly fast, reaching a top speed of 32.5 knots and protecting the U.S. fast carriers.

Although the armament was not increased in terms of caliber or number, it was improved in quality. The new 50-caliber 16-inch (406mm) gun replaced the 45-caliber weapon employed in the South Dakota-class. In addition, a new turret had been designed, which also saved almost 850 tons. The new class also carried the same secondary battery of twenty 5-inch/38mm guns in ten twin turrets.

The battleships were equally well protected, with a belt of internal hull armor plates – consisting of nickel-steel – of 12.1 inches (307.3mm) tapered to 1.62 inches (41.1mm) on a 19-degree incline, while the face-plate of the turrets had 17 inches (431.8mm) of armor. Instead of bulges, the Iowa-class was provided with solid internal protection, which consisted of four substantial longitudinal bulkheads, alternate bulkheads reaching up to the armored decks running into the top and bottom of the main belt.

U.S. Steel, Bethlehem Steel, and Lukens Steel all manufactured the armor used on the Iowa-class battleships, and it was strong enough that it could have likely withstood a direct hit from an 18-inch armor-piercing shell from 18,000 yards (about 10 miles).

Six Planned, Four Built

The U.S. Navy originally called for six planned Iowa-class battleships, which were authorized in three batches of two. The first two ships, USS Iowa (BB-61) and USS New Jersey (BB-62) were authorized in Fiscal Year 1939 (FY3), and the contract was signed on July 1 1939. They were laid down in June 27 and September 16, 1940, respectively.

The next pair, which included the USS Missouri (BB-63) and USS Wisconsin (BB-64), was part of the FY41 budget – and they were ordered on June 12, 1940 and were laid down on January 6, 1941, and January 25, 1941, respectively.

Two additional ships were ordered – USS Illinois (BB-65) and USS Kentucky (BB-66) – but canceled before completion. The former’s hull remained as a parts hulk until she was broken up in 1958, while various proposals were made to complete BB-65 as a guided missile battleship. That plan was finally abandoned due to cost concerns as well as the rampant evolving missile technology, and Kentucky was sold for scrap at the end of the 1950s.

Iowa-Class

An aerial port bow view of the battleship USS NEW JERSEY (BB-62) launching an RGM-84 Harpoon missile on the Pacific Missile Test Center Range.

USS Iowa

Image: Creative Commons

It took approximately two years, eight months to build each of the four completed Iowa-class battleships. Though some 2,800 men would serve on each of the warships during in World War II, tens of thousands of men and women worked in shifts around the clock at each of the U.S. naval yards that produced the battlewagons. More than 71,000 people were employed at the Brooklyn Navy Yard, the largest center in the navy and the largest employer in the State of New York during the war.

A Good Value?

As capital warships, they were a capital investment, costing a reported $100 million each in 1940 dollars – or around nearly $2 billion per ship today. However, to put that in perspective, the U.S. Navy’s USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN-78) aircraft carrier has been estimated to be $13.3 billion – but it is running 30 percent overestimates.

Battleships

Iowa-class battleship. Image Credit: Creative Commons.

Battleship USS Iowa

USS Iowa. Image Credit: Creative Commons.

For the cost of the single carrier, the Navy could have built all six Iowa-class battleships with money to spare.

Now a Senior Editor for 1945, Peter Suciu is a Michigan-based writer who has contributed to more than four dozen magazines, newspapers and websites. He regularly writes about military hardware, and is the author of several books on military headgear including A Gallery of Military Headdress, which is available on Amazon.com. Peter is also a Contributing Writer for Forbes.

Written By

Expert Biography: A Senior Editor for 1945, Peter Suciu is a Michigan-based writer who has contributed to more than four dozen magazines, newspapers, and websites with over 3,000 published pieces over a twenty-year career in journalism. He regularly writes about military hardware, firearms history, cybersecurity, and international affairs. Peter is also a Contributing Writer for Forbes. You can follow him on Twitter: @PeterSuciu.

2 Comments

2 Comments

  1. daniel flynn

    April 30, 2022 at 2:32 pm

    Very interesting read. Keep it coming.

    I think you have a conversion error regarding the secondary battery guns: 5″ is not 38mm, more like 127mm.

  2. Steven R Errebo

    April 30, 2022 at 9:11 pm

    5/38 is used to calculate the barrel length. 5 inch bore times 38 equals 190 inch long gun barrel

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Advertisement