Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Smart Bombs: Military, Defense and National Security

Is China Preparing to Destroy the U.S. Navy?

DF-26
Image of US Navy Aircraft Carrier Under a Simulated Attack in Chinese Desert Mockup.

Practice makes perfect – a statement that is absolutely true in advance of a military operation. Soldiers, sailors, pilots, and other warfighters typically spend much time “training.” Sometimes, the training doesn’t always go as planned – as was noted in the ill-fated Operation Tiger, the massive dress rehearsal for the invasion of Normandy, when a German patrol caught the Allied forces completely off-guard.

However, other times the training proved to be vital to success.

Such was the case with the Imperial Japanese Navy’s attack on Pearl Harbor. The Japanese forces trained for about a year to prepare for the attack.

“Simply put, how the Japanese prepared for the attack is what assured their success that morning, and it is likely the Americans could have done nothing to alter significantly the outcome of the attack,” the U.S. Naval Institute noted in a feature on the history of the Pearl Harbor assault.

China Is Testing Missiles in the Desert

Such should be a lesson for the U.S. military today, as China has been reported to be honing its ship-killing skills for a potential future conflict. Where the Japanese practiced around the waters of its home islands, China is preparing for any future conflict in the desert.

As has been previously reported, China has been building aircraft carrier targets in the Taklamakan Desert, and USNI News reported this month that other sites have emerged forming “a string of large-scale target ranges running along the eastern edge of the desert.” Satellite photos suggest that these include simulated warships that were modeled on actually U.S. ships in port.

Among these is a facility that includes full-scale piers and destroyer-sized “ship-like” targets that were constructed in December. A test missile was reported to have hit the simulated warship “dead center” in February. The target site was then quickly disassembled, likely for evaluation.

U.S. Carriers As Targets

Such sites, located in extremely remote regions, have apparently been used for testing hypersonic anti-ship ballistic missiles (ASBMs), which have been seen as a potential “carrier killer.” Based on past evidence, it is clear that the United States Navy’s carriers are what China has been preparing to strike.

Satellite images captured by Colorado-based satellite imagery company Maxar Technologies reportedly showed the mock-ups of the U.S. warships at a ballistic missile test site, and the targets appeared to represent a U.S. Navy nuclear-powered carrier such as the Nimitz or Ford-class, as well as an Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer.

These test sites have been known for years. They had been used to test early versions of its so-called carrier killer DF-21D anti-ship ballistic missile in 2013. During those tests, the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) very publicly claimed it “successfully sunk” a carrier in a war game.

Now it seems that China is looking to test its even more advanced ASBMs, and potentially ensure that the weapons could discern a ship from a pier – and have the capability of sinking U.S. warships before they could ever escape to open-water. While it is said that to ensure peace, you need to prepare for war – but the U.S. should also ensure that China doesn’t perfect its ability to strike its warships.

Now a Senior Editor for 1945, Peter Suciu is a Michigan-based writer who has contributed to more than four dozen magazines, newspapers and websites. He regularly writes about military hardware, and is the author of several books on military headgear including A Gallery of Military Headdress, which is available on Amazon.com. Peter is also a Contributing Writer for Forbes.

Written By

Expert Biography: A Senior Editor for 1945, Peter Suciu is a Michigan-based writer who has contributed to more than four dozen magazines, newspapers, and websites with over 3,000 published pieces over a twenty-year career in journalism. He regularly writes about military hardware, firearms history, cybersecurity, and international affairs. Peter is also a Contributing Writer for Forbes. You can follow him on Twitter: @PeterSuciu.

14 Comments

14 Comments

  1. Michael Frelk GMC(sw) Ret

    June 1, 2022 at 9:06 am

    Mock ups don’t shoot back….

    • Abolish2022

      June 2, 2022 at 1:17 am

      Yeah but the aren’t a friendly nation so America’s accuracy won’t be good since they are better at friendly fire

    • Mark Scott

      June 2, 2022 at 11:54 pm

      And neither do ‘wokesters’ Chief! Once upon a time I had zero fear of foreign engagement. The past couple of years of less than poor seamanship and Gunner’s Mates surrendering without firing a shot to Iranian sailors in The Gulf has changed all of that. Now my hopes hinge on China’s inability to make weapons work correctly.

  2. TrustbutVerify

    June 1, 2022 at 9:30 am

    They used to mount W or B-54 warheads on HAWK anti-air missiles to potentially shoot down whole Soviet bomber formations. I would think, with our current evolved missile technology on SM-3 and SM-6 missiles (actually hitting individual missiles) we could use these to ensure we get missile kills, in space (above the atmosphere), and totally eliminate these threats.

    • sarsfield

      June 1, 2022 at 6:50 pm

      think u mean the Falcon AAM – HAwk never had a nuke head – Nike Herc did.

  3. afhack62

    June 1, 2022 at 9:45 am

    Did the Chicoms give their missiles severe vertigo to compensate for the target being fixed in a desert?

    More on target is the consistently juvenile nature of Chicom propaganda.

  4. Fenderowner

    June 1, 2022 at 9:51 am

    True, but one hopes the US Navy is thinking outside of the box on the emerging China naval situation; i.e., the deliberate development of a navy capable of challening our navy. We haven’t seen such a capability since the IJN of WWII, So we need some innovative naval strategists to be looking at this. To quote Italian Air marshal Guiliot Douhet, “Victory smiles upon those who anticipate the change in the character of war, not upon those who wait to adapt themselves after the changes occur.“

  5. Stefan Stackhouse

    June 1, 2022 at 12:24 pm

    Just to be prudent, I would suggest that the USN not attempt to sail its ships into the Taklamakan.

  6. Doyle

    June 1, 2022 at 1:45 pm

    Targeting aquisition, retention and lock are China’s biggest problem here, not some static piece of dirt.

  7. Bill

    June 1, 2022 at 4:36 pm

    If we hit them first we won’t need to worry about getting caught in port.

    • Abolish2022

      June 2, 2022 at 1:21 am

      I would be more concerned with the amount of mass shootings and the fact you still sell guns to anyone and the fact you have just made it so unsafe for you’re own women in America, you’re country is a backwards joke that is nothing more than self proclaimed world police that’s best at friendly fire and lying to make war 🔔🔚

      • Samuel Gontz

        June 2, 2022 at 3:00 pm

        Get off idiot..

  8. Sanford Kelson

    June 1, 2022 at 7:51 pm

    Doesn’t anybody think that a war between China and the United States will have no winners? Doesn’t anybody think that we ought to be advocating peace and, God forbid, actually work for it? Yikes, you people scare me.

  9. CST

    June 1, 2022 at 10:16 pm

    China: We welcome continued delusion

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Advertisement