Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Uncategorized

Russia’s Military Is Failing Miserably in Ukraine (Video and Pictures)

Russia
Russian Su-34 fighter-bomber. Image Credit: Creative Commons.

More Fiascos for Russia’s Military as Its Invasion of Ukraine Grinds On – The second week of Putin’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine kicked off with a surge of Russian airstrikes (following a sclerotic presence in the first week) and continued offensives in southwestern and across eastern Ukraine. But the main drive from Belarus towards northwestern Kyiv appears to remain bogged down, literally and metaphorically.

Russia’s forces appear beset major shortages of fuel, food, and ammunition, resulting in troops looting grocery stores for food and abandoning many undamaged armored vehicles.

Large-scale civil disobedience by Ukrainian civilians in the occupied cities of Melitopol and Kherson also may be impeding operations.

Heavy casualties and misleading messaging from the Kremlin appear to be causing poor morale amongst Russian troops.

These conditions laid the ground for several fiascos for Russia’s military, even as its forces drive deeper into southwestern and eastern Ukraine.

Russia’s advance guard near Kyiv destroyed

After Russia’s heliborne assault landing on Hostomel Airport near Kyiv met with disaster on the opening day of the war, a second Russian landing operation recaptured the field. Either via the airport or land routes, the paratroopers were reinforced with their lightly armored BMD-2, BDM-4M and BTR-D fighting vehicles and Rosgvardia internal security troops.

These advance forces attempted to rush the western Kyiv in the first weekend of the war in an attempt to fulfill Putin’s ill-conceived war plans, but their assaults were repelled with heavy losses.

Intent on shutting down the Russian airhead, Kyiv’s defenders riposted, plastering the airfield with rockets and heavy artillery and launching a counterattack which wiped out the remaining paratroopers and Rosvgardia. Horrifying recordings of the streets of Hostomel show the charred remains of numerous BMD vehicles and their occupants.

The world’s largest airplane, the An-225 Mriya, was also destroyed in the fighting.

Ukrainian forces continue to hold Russian mechanized units at bay at Bucha, Hostomel and Irpin. For a good measure, open ground east of Hostomel leading to Kyiv has been flooded to constrain possible avenues of attack on the capital.

Air assault on Voznesensk

On the heels of the failed air-landing operation at Hostomel and another Vasylkiv, on March 5 Russia’s military tried again to outflank Ukrainian defenses with heliborne paratroopers, this time in southwestern Ukraine. There, troops advancing out of Crimea under Lt. Gen. Mikhail Zusko made substantial gains when they consolidated control over the city of Kherson and its critical bridge over the Dnieper River.

Moscow aims to seize all of Ukraine’s Black Sea coastline, most importantly the port-metropolis of Odessa. But between Kherson and Odessa lie the Tylihul River and the port of Mykolaiv, also a Ukrainian naval base.

Russian advance forces had entered Mykolaiv even before Kherson was secured, but these early probes, and later full-fledge attacks, were repulsed by Ukrainian forces, aided by strikes from Ukrainian Su-24M bomber and Su-25 attack jets.

A Russian airborne helicopter landing at Mykolaiv airport was also defeated on March 2-3. Photos from Mykolaiv now show expended 300-millimeter rockets cannisters designed to dispense cluster bomblets, testifying to the punishment the city is taking.

Zusko then switched focus to flanking Mykolaiv by moving on Voznesenk to the northwest. After several attacks by land were thwarted, on March 5 he dispatched elements of the 247th Air Assault Regiment (of the 7th Airborne Division) to execute a helicopter-borne landing operation in concert with another land offensive.

But while skimming close to tree-top height, the Russian helicopters were ravaged by short-range anti-aircraft missiles—apparently Igla or Piorun man-portable systems donated by Poland.

One shocking video captures the moment a Mi-24 Hind attack helicopter is struck in its two-seat canopy by a missile, causing it to plummet to the ground in a fireball.

A Russian Mi-8ASHt assault transport helicopter was downed, as well as two more escorting Mi-35 Hind gunships and an Su-30SM jet fighter. When another Mi-8 attempted to rescue the Su-30’s crew, it too was shot down.

https://twitter.com/RALee85/status/1500361988458917890

The Russian paratroopers that made it to the ground came promptly under attack by local forces. The landing force was destroyed, and the 247th’s commander, Col. Konstantin Zizevsky reportedly killed in action.

The coinciding land offensive didn’t go well either.

Russia besieges Kharkiv—Kharkiv bites back.

The metropolis of Kharkiv lies right on the border with Russia, and from day one has been under near continual indiscriminate bombardment by Russian forces, which also creeped forward troops to surround the city of two million.

But on March 4, Ukraine’s 92nd Mechanized Brigade launched a counterattack targeting the 144th Motor Rifle Division. The 92nd comprises three mechanized infantry battalions in 8×8 wheeled BTR-4E fighting vehicles, four artillery battalions (two of self-propelled 2S1 and 2S3 howitzers, one rocket, one anti-tank guns), one T-64BV2 tank battalion and the local 22nd ‘Kharkiv’ motorized infantry battalion.

By March 5, a Ukrainian official claimed the attack had destroyed the division’s 488th Motor-Rifle regiment, which left behind dozens of abandoned tanks, trucks and APCs. Ukrainian forces reportedly advanced all the way to the Russian border.

On March 6 another counteroffensive recaptured Chuhuiv and its large airbase, 11 miles southeast of Kharkiv. The Ukrainian military claimed the commander of the 61st Naval Infantry Brigade and deputy commander of the 11th Air Assault Brigade were killed in the attack. The latter seen questionable, though, as his death was reported March 2.

These counterattacks won’t bring an end to the siege of Kharkiv—Russian artillery can still hit the city from across the border, where Russian forces are concentrated in Belgorod. However, it has bought breathing room for the city’s defenders, and conceivably carved out space for further counteroffensives.

Northeast of Kyiv, Russian forces are bypassing cities they can’t capture.

Russian units advancing out of Gomel, Belarus and Belgorod, Russia have been threading their way towards the east bank of Kyiv, overcoming Ukrainian defenses in smaller cities like Nizhyn and Pryluky along the way. But they have repeatedly failed to dislodge defenders from the heavily fortified cities of Chernihiv and Sumy close to the Russian border, despite withering artillery and aerial bombardment.

Bypassing these cities allows Russian forces to besiege the eastern approaches of Kyiv sooner, with engagements already recorded near Kyiv’s eastern suburb of Brovary.

But it does leave those forces reliant on awkward supply lines—and significant Ukrainian garrisons next to those supply lines that may interdict the flow of fuel, ammunition and reinforcements and present a threat to flanks.

Russian warplanes are falling out of the sky left and right.

For the first week of the war Russian airpower was only sporadically active over Ukraine, failing to wipe out Ukrainian air defenses or interdict the Ukrainian air force’s own operations. Relatedly, the downing of only one or two Russian fixed-wing aircraft could be confirmed.

That changed dramatically in March as video footage reveals a surge of Russian airstrikes across Ukraine, including by advanced two-seat Su-34 jet bombers hitherto not seen in action. A Russian TV report suggests MiG-31BM interceptors and older Su-24M bombers are active over Ukraine too.

But that been matched by a steep surge of confirmed losses, including at least four Su-25 Frogfoot ground attack jets. That’s not so surprising, as these were designed for dangerous low-altitude ground attack missions delivering unguided bombs and rockets.

But there are also four confirmed losses of Su-34 supersonic bombers, which are well-equipped to deliver precision guided weapons more safely from higher altitudes using laser targeting pods.

Two factors may explain this: Russia has a comparatively limited stockpile of precision air-to-ground munitions, and likely is reserving the majority in event of a conflict with NATO. But Russian mission planners may also deem Ukraine’s surviving high-altitude air defenses—S-300 and Buk missile batteries—a greater threat than the numerous short-range air defenses Ukraine has saturated around the battlefield.

As a result, even Russia’s most advanced warplanes are being used like World War II fighter bombers: making low-level attacks with unguided bombs and rockets, and suffering World War II-level losses to ground fire. That’s unsustainable given how much more expensive modern warplanes are.

Putin’s war lurches onward

Despite these setbacks around Kyiv, Kharkiv and Mykolaiv, Russia’s multi-pronged invasion of Ukraine still advances on several fronts. The robust defense of Mykolaiv, for example, is complicated by a Russian naval infantry brigade embarked on landing ships in the Black Sea which may attempt an amphibious landing targeting Odessa in concert with an attack by Russian troops in the breakaway Transnistria region of neighboring Moldova.

Russian forces in southern Ukraine are also advancing northeast along the east bank of the Dnieper, threatening Zaporizhzhya and Dnipro, which have additional valuable bridges over the great river. And they’re enveloping the already besieged port of Mariupol on the Sea of Azov from the east.

Meanwhile, Russia’s 8th Army, bolstered by thousands of pro-Russian separatist troops, is slowly forcing back veteran Ukrainian troops deployed in the Donbass region. While these forces have avoided being overrun, they remain at risk of being cut off by Russian forces advancing north from Crimea and south from Belgorod.

Kyiv therefore faces fiendish dilemmas choosing between defending well-fortified cities in eastern Ukraine bound to be cut off from resupply, or attempting to fall back towards the Dnieper, a retrograde movement which could end catastrophically.

Sébastien Roblin writes on the technical, historical, and political aspects of international security and conflict for publications including the 19FortyFiveThe National InterestNBC NewsForbes.com and War is Boring. He holds a Master’s degree from Georgetown University and served with the Peace Corps in China.  You can follow his articles on Twitter.

Written By

Sebastien Roblin writes on the technical, historical, and political aspects of international security and conflict for publications including the 19FortyFive, The National Interest, NBC News, Forbes.com, and War is Boring. He holds a Master’s degree from Georgetown University and served with the Peace Corps in China.  

9 Comments

9 Comments

  1. Alex

    March 7, 2022 at 4:11 pm

    I always thought that only bloggers spread fakes. Not the smartest though. But I see that propaganda is failing and therefore all sorts of “doctors, professors, masters” and others have joined the cheap fakes.
    Okay – all smart people don’t care about fakes. But: Russia is failing because you so wanted it? Or do you have plans for the General Staff of the Russian Ministry of Defense? It was clearly stated that Russia’s special military operation would take from two weeks to a month. All tasks are being carried out, Russia is not running shamefully leaving weapons and dogs, like the United States from Afghanistan. Don’t spread fakes. After all, they only laugh at bloggers, and “academic degrees” themselves become fakes. Boom – and the person is simply incompetent and uneducated.

  2. A penny tossed to the wind

    March 7, 2022 at 6:23 pm

    May I please make this distinction again?

    In referring to Russia, or the United States, or the UK, and when we read the words “Russia” or “USA” or “UK” or any other nation these terms benefit from this mental distinction.

    There is “leadership” and there is “citizenry”. That is the distinction. (A further distinction is “current” leadership, but we’ll let that ride.)

    In a democratic nation, however healthy or not that democracy, it is more fair, more reasonable, to say that that nation’s leadership represents its citizenry. Therefore, the two can be read, more reasonably, as one.

    However, as democratic nations these days question and reflect on the quality and health of their democracies, the distinction in mind augurs well for better quality of thought, and quality of understanding and assessment.

    In non-democratic nations, the distinction is critical.

    Therefore the word “Russia” and “Russian” depending on useage and on context benefits hugely from the mental interrogation of that distinction.

    Put simply, what “Russia” says, and what “Russia” does, and thinks, is what “Russian leadership” says and does and thinks, and not necessarily what “Russian citizenry” says or does or thinks.

    We, neither Russian citizens or non-citizens, simply do not know
    how strongly or weakly “Russian leadership” represents “Russian citizenry” and therefore “Russia” itself.

    Thus, because none of us know truly how Russian citizenry think or feel or act in relation to this war, (and Russian leadership may have no clue, too) and because Russian citizenry cannot freely speak for itself, en masse, then references to “Russia” must for mental clarity speak for and be read as “Russian leadership”.

  3. Jebelkin

    March 7, 2022 at 7:00 pm

    Russia is failing hard and a laughing stock – they are like Iraq, the 6th strongest army in the world but right now, they would lose to Belgium … looks like the collapse of Russia is April 1, hope your check cleared and it’s not in rubles which is a rubble of a currency

  4. critical-thinker-3-7-22

    March 7, 2022 at 8:13 pm

    Basically all of these “videos” have been proven fake lmao

  5. Alex

    March 8, 2022 at 10:37 am

    Interestingly, Russia would “fail” if it used cluster bombs, napalm, uranium shells like the United States in Korea, Vietnam? And then, the United States lost in both Korea and Vietnam. Russia has a goal – to save as many civilians as possible, and the Nazi Bandera people are hiding behind them as human shields. What is real power: raze cities to the ground, or show mercy and try to save more people? I think, in this case, Russia shows the true strength and power. Bravo.

  6. Chris Kyle

    March 8, 2022 at 9:20 pm

    vietnam joined WTO in 2007′ vladnik. hearts & minds ffs.

  7. Alex

    March 9, 2022 at 10:45 am

    Chris – tell it to the killed and tortured Vietnamese. And don’t forget to take Xanax.

  8. Joe Pec

    March 9, 2022 at 12:34 pm

    The one thing this war has accomplished is the realization that attacking a sovereign country in the 21st century is going to cost you the destruction of your own country. The destruction of war cannot be hid anymore and the bombing of cities which pose no threat is going to be well documented. Russia might well win this invasion but it will be a world pariah and will never be allowed into the world community until the current leadership is gone. The only benefit of this invasion has had is stopping China from attacking Taiwan. For all Chinas bluster about Taiwan being part of mainland China this invasion has put the Chinese Government on notice the world community will be watching you.

  9. KKK

    March 13, 2022 at 9:59 pm

    Ukraine peoples suffer from what were the Ukraine Nazzy goverment done! and NATO boss US are happy to see it

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Advertisement