Key Points and Summary: Russia’s Cold War-era Tu-22M bomber plays a crucial role in the ongoing Ukraine war despite its aging design.
-Originally conceived for nuclear strikes against NATO fleets, the swing-wing Tu-22M is now employed for long-range missile attacks on Ukraine’s infrastructure, operating from beyond contested airspace.
-Although its older airframe proves somewhat effective in delivering standoff munitions, it remains vulnerable to Ukraine’s Western-supplied air defenses. Notably, a Ukrainian drone attack destroyed a Tu-22M deep inside Russian territory in 2023, highlighting the bomber’s vulnerability and symbolic importance.
-While its future is questionable in a stealth-oriented world, Russia continues relying on the Tu-22M for strategic strikes.
Why Russia Still Relies on the Tu-22M Bomber in Ukraine
Russia’s Tupolev Tu-22M, a long-range strategic bomber, has played a crucial role for Russia as part of Moscow’s ongoing invasion of Ukraine.
Although the bomber has been utilized in a very different manner than its original designers likely envisioned, the Cold War-era bomber has enjoyed a new lease on life and as a way through particularly the robust, Western-supplied air defenses Ukraine operates. Its original role was radically different.
The Tu-22M was designed to fulfill a dual role within the Soviet Air Force: a long-range bomber for strategic strikes and as a maritime strike platform against NATO naval forces. Capable of supersonic speed and boasting a large weapon payload capacity, Russian planners envisioned the swing-wing bomber delivering nuclear or conventional weapons against NATO, particularly carrier strike groups or other strategic assets.
The long-range bomber could also conduct strategic reconnaissance and, thanks to an in-flight refueling capability, boasted an even farther flight radius.
Tu-22M Bomber Role in Syria
Russia utilized the Tu-22M during its years-long foray into Syria against Syrian rebel groups arrayed against the Assad regime, where their service was marked by widespread and indiscriminate bombing using dumb, free-fall munitions against targets that often included civilians and civilian infrastructure.
However, now that Russia is poised to permanently lose its toehold on the Mediterranean in Syria following the successful overthrow of the regime by rebel forces, that bomber’s future in the Middle East is very likely over.
A Different Role in Ukraine
In Ukraine, Russia uses the Tu-22M primarily as a long-range platform for launching stand-off munitions, often cruise missiles, against Ukrainian civilian infrastructure. This strategy allows the Tu-22M to hold a variety of targets throughout Ukraine at risk while also staying far away from contested airspace.
Though an effective way to conduct strikes and keep the Tu-22M out of harm’s way, the strategy also reflects Russia’s inability to achieve air superiority virtually anywhere in Ukraine thanks to Ukraine’s robust air defense network, supported by systems like the American-supplied Patriot and Germany’s IRIS-T, which severely restricts the operational freedom of not just the Tu-22M, but all Russian aircraft.
Losses Are Happening
Despite the Tu-22M’s usefulness to Russia, the bomber has not been immune to losses. Several Tu-22Ms have been downed, a testament not just to the aforementioned air defenses.
One notable incident happened in August 2023, when a Ukrainian drone strike targeted the Soltsy-2 airbase in Russia’s Novgorod region, destroying at least one Tu-22M. This was an unusual and rather significant symbolic blow for Russia, and it underscored Ukraine’s growing ability to strike targets far behind enemy lines using drones. The loss not only reduced Russia’s long-range strike capabilities but — perhaps more importantly — was a propaganda victory for Ukraine, showcasing its capacity to retaliate against strategic Russian assets.
Russia’s use of the Tu-22M’s in Ukraine highlights how Russia has adjusted how they employ their Cold War-era legacy Soviet platforms for use in modern warfare — and how they have had to contend with a concerted effort by Ukraine, using Western-supplied weapons to hold the Russias at bay.
Though the bomber would struggle against a peer rival — say, the United States or other European countries within the auspices of NATO — it has found a useful, if niche, role in the war in Ukraine.
The future of that bomber in a world trending toward aircraft with stealth capabilities remains uncertain. But for the time being, it has a role to play within the Russian armed forces.
About the Author: Caleb Larson
Caleb Larson is an American multiformat journalist based in Berlin, Germany. His work covers the intersection of conflict and society, focusing on American foreign policy and European security. He has reported from Germany, Russia, and the United States. Most recently, he covered the war in Ukraine, reporting extensively on the war’s shifting battle lines from Donbas and writing on the war’s civilian and humanitarian toll. Previously, he worked as a Defense Reporter for POLITICO Europe. You can follow his latest work on X.
Note: This piece has been updated since publication.
Major Stephen zeller
January 4, 2025 at 3:42 pm
I seriously doubt Zelensky has been able to hit even one TU-23m bomber. Sounds like typical B’s from a side about to loose one third of the land mass of his country.
Jason
January 4, 2025 at 3:42 pm
This article is incredibly dumb. Do they write these headlines just to try to make people feel good? The article acts as though these bombers are getting shot out of the skies, when the only loss they cite is a bomber sitting on the ground hit by a drone. What a joke.
newt
January 4, 2025 at 7:43 pm
Nothing but lies and misinformation.
Tod
January 5, 2025 at 3:29 am
I doubt the Ruskies would discourage propaganda weak as this!
Michael Miller
January 5, 2025 at 5:06 am
Most of the articles from this source and from this author are clickbait and three times too long for what relevant information is provided.
Xoxol
January 5, 2025 at 6:00 am
Is this yet another CIA sponsored “free and indpendent” outlet?
Philip
January 5, 2025 at 7:31 am
The headline states “Russia’s Tu-22M Bomber Is Getting Smashed Out Of The Skies Above Ukraine” BUT Russia’s Tu-22M bomber is NOT getting smashed out of the SKIES ABOVE Ukraine.
First, the Tu-22M bomber is not flying in the skies above Ukraine.
Secondly, not a single Tu-22M bomber has been hit by Ukraine in the skies above Russia, where they operate because Ukraine has no weapons to do this and will not be given weapons by NATO to do this because Joe Biden, in particular, fears that damage to Russia’s nuclear strategic bombers could trigger a nuclear response.
Thirdly, not a single Tu-22M bomber has been damaged by any weapons provided by NATO members.
Fourthly, of the fleet of 100 off Tu-22M bombers, a substantial number of which were Ukrainian and given by Ukraine to Russia in around 1995 in a moment absolute stupidity, Ukraine has only destroyed a single Tu-22M bomber parked on the ground probably using a home grown low tech drone flying low for about 1,000 miles at about 100 mph.
Ladialaus
January 5, 2025 at 12:10 pm
It is Very clear that Zelensky is winning this war and Russia is losing after suffering significant losses including massive losses of Tu 22M . So far Ukraine is winning in the Donbass even in Kursk Russia is losing massively. Slava Ukraine, Vladimir Putin days are numbered and now Zelensky can easily join the North Atlantic Terrorists Organisation aka NATO
aaron wilkerson
January 5, 2025 at 1:07 pm
poor journalism as per norm. 19fortyfive is a joke. do you actually pay these people?!
Makoto
January 5, 2025 at 3:08 pm
Only an American could write such nonsense.
Tony C
January 5, 2025 at 5:15 pm
To be fair, the claim that Russia’s Backfires are being shot out of the sky is exaggerated…but it’s an established fact that at least one DID get shot out of the sky, just last year.
Personally, I don’t get why the Russians dubbed this plane “Tu-22M,” suggesting it to be a refit variant of the Tu-22 Blinder which was a totally different plane. The only similarities between the Backfires and the Blinders before them are in the number of engines and the fact they can both go supersonic. That’s where their similarities end. They should have accepted a different model number like Tu-26, which was what the West originally thought it to be. I still prefer to look at it as Tu-26, because it sho’-ain’t no Blinder.
On the other hand, Russia has a refitted MiG-29 dubbed a different number (can’t remember it now, maybe -41?); there was their ground-attack refit of the MiG-23 dubbed the -27; and of course half a dozen different numbers for the refits of their Su-27 design. I swear, Russians be really whack; no wonder they can’t win a war.
Joseph Felician
January 5, 2025 at 9:32 pm
Think There is No Evidence of Any Downing , Save The One Hit by Drone on The Ground.
The Rest is Usual Anti Russia Propaganda by The West.
Webej
January 5, 2025 at 11:48 pm
» Russia’s inability to achieve air superiority virtually anywhere in Ukraine thanks to Ukraine’s robust air defense network, supported by systems like the American-supplied Patriot and Germany’s IRIS-T «
Author does not produce any metrics or statistics to gauge any of this
» widespread and indiscriminate bombing using dumb, free-fall munitions against targets that often included civilians and civilian infrastructure «
They were outfitted with kits and were released with sophisticated targeting using humidity, windspeed, and other characteristics and were in fact quite efficient, and represented a cheap way to guide the bombs.