Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Smart Bombs: Military, Defense and National Security

Hundreds of Tomahawks Gone: The Navy Can’t Retire the Ohio-Class SSGN Submarines Now

The U.S. Navy is navigating a critical “trough” in undersea firepower. The retirement of just four Ohio-class SSGNs removes more than 600 Tomahawk launch tubes from the fleet, a capacity that newer, smaller attack submarines are struggling to match.

Ohio-class submarine. Image Credit: Creative Commons.
Ohio-class submarine. Image Credit: Creative Commons.

Summary and Key Points: Kris Osborn, President of Warrior Maven and former Pentagon expert, evaluates the critical need to maintain U.S. undersea firepower as Operation Epic Fury in Iran underscores the importance of massed precision strikes.

-With the four Ohio-class SSGNs—capable of carrying 154 Tomahawks each—slated for retirement starting in 2026, the Navy faces a significant VLS (Vertical Launch System) cell deficit.

-This report analyzes the transition to Block V Virginia-class submarines equipped with the Virginia Payload Module (VPM).

-Osborn concludes that while the VPM offsets individual hull losses, the Navy should consider further life extensions for the aging SSGNs to ensure sufficient magazine depth against peer adversaries like China.

The Firepower Gap: Why the Navy Might Be Forced to Keep Aging Ohio-Class SSGNs Past 2026

The war in Iran and the wide array of persistent global threats indicate the need for fires will likely endure into the future.

The need for long-range, stand-off weapons such as Tomahawk missiles, for example, is not likely to diminish anytime soon.

Tomahawks are vital munitions—they can change course in flight, hit moving targets, and provide a drone-like surveillance ability. 

Submarine-fired Tomahawks are often the first weapons to strike.

This has been true across many years of conflict. The Tomahawks can target enemy command and control nodes, critical infrastructure, and other high-value targets.

In many conflicts there will be a need to unleash massive amounts of firepower—or at least to position such firepower within striking distance of an enemy coastline. Submarines can fire Tomahawks from safe stand-off ranges to prepare an enemy coastline for closer-in attacks. 

Modern Tomahawks

A Tomahawk cruise missile launches from the forward vertical launch system of the USS Shiloh (CG 67) to attack selected air defense targets south of the 33rd parallel in Iraq on Sept. 3, 1996, as part of Operation Desert Strike. The attacks are designed to reduce risks to the pilots who will enforce the expanded no-fly zone. President Clinton announced an expanded no-fly zone in response to an Iraqi attack against a Kurdish faction. The larger no-fly zone in Southern Iraq will make it easier for U.S. and coalition partners to contain Saddam Hussein's aggression. The U.S. Navy Ticonderoga Class cruiser launched the missiles as it operated in the Persian Gulf.

A Tomahawk cruise missile launches from the forward vertical launch system of the USS Shiloh (CG 67) to attack selected air defense targets south of the 33rd parallel in Iraq on Sept. 3, 1996, as part of Operation Desert Strike. The attacks are designed to reduce risks to the pilots who will enforce the expanded no-fly zone. President Clinton announced an expanded no-fly zone in response to an Iraqi attack against a Kurdish faction. The larger no-fly zone in Southern Iraq will make it easier for U.S. and coalition partners to contain Saddam Hussein’s aggression. The U.S. Navy Ticonderoga Class cruiser launched the missiles as it operated in the Persian Gulf.

Tomahawk missiles can change course in flight to destroy moving targets at sea. Other munitions are on their way.

Hypersonic weapons fired from the decks of U.S. Navy destroyers, and weapons such as air- and-ship-launched Long Range Anti-Ship Missile, will soon be the key instruments of naval firepower.

Massing power and targeting with precision are the highest priorities for the Navy.

Indeed, the service may need to extend the service lives of its four Ohio-class guided-missile submarines (SSGNs), which are able to carry 154 Tomahawks per boat. 

Drones, electronic warfare (EW) and AI-enabled multi-domain targeting are all the focus of innovation and modernization efforts as the Navy prepares for future warfare—yet none of these applications can achieve strong battlefield effects without simple, lethal firepower.

Ultimately, lethal effects must be brought upon a target with sufficient destructive power to achieve the intended result.

SOUDA BAY, Greece (May 21, 2013) The Ohio-class guided-missile submarine USS Florida (SSGN 728), gold crew, arrives in Souda harbor. Florida is homeported in Kings Bay, Ga., and is deployed conducting maritime security operations and theater security cooperation efforts in the U.S. 6th Fleet area of responsibility. (U.S. Navy photo by Paul Farley/Released) 130521-N-MO201-047

SOUDA BAY, Greece (May 21, 2013) The Ohio-class guided-missile submarine USS Florida (SSGN 728), gold crew, arrives in Souda harbor. Florida is homeported in Kings Bay, Ga., and is deployed conducting maritime security operations and theater security cooperation efforts in the U.S. 6th Fleet area of responsibility. (U.S. Navy photo by Paul Farley/Released) 130521-N-MO201-047

Ohio-Class SSGN

Ohio-Class SSGN. Image Credit: U.S. Navy.

USS Georgia Ohio-Class SSGN U.S. Navy

FERNANDINA BEACH, Fla. – The Ohio-class guided missile submarine USS Georgia (SSGN 729) transits the Saint Marys River July 15. Georgia returned to Kings Bay after spending more than a year forward deployed. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 1st Class(SW) James Kimber)

Even after the many breakthroughs in the realm of precision targeting, many large targets require a substantial amount of firepower to destroy.

Keep the SSGNs

This reality is not lost on weapons developers, who recognize the importance of maintaining undersea firepower in the form of torpedoes and Tomahawk missiles. SSGNs are responsible for much of this task.

Their Tomahawk capacity makes them a crucial source of undersea firepower, particularly given that Tomahawks can travel as far as 900 miles to a target. SSGNs have been used to fire weapons in several conflicts, including in Libya in 2011.

These submarines, much like the nuclear-armed Ohio-class ballistic missile submarines, have already outlived their intended lifespans. Therefore, in anticipation of their retirement, the U.S. Navy has been fast-tracking the Virginia Payload Modules for Block V Virginia-class submarines.

This module is an added 80-foot section on Virginia-class submarines that massively increases firepower from 12 Tomahawks to 40 Tomahawks per boat. This initiative, already progressing and under construction, is intended as a deliberate effort to help offset the loss of firepower expected when the four SSGNs retire.

Given the sheer mass, scope, and size of potential targets in rival nations, the Ohio-class SSGNs might deserve to see a further extension of their service lives. Wars involve striking a wide array of large, spread apart targets such as ships, buildings, armored vehicles, and other high-density, dispersed, objectives.

These all call for sea-launched firepower. It will take many more years for sufficient numbers of Block V Virginia-class boats to arrive—making the effort to keep the SSGNs operational might be worthwhile.

Maintenance Challenges

This would not be easy to accomplish, however. The Ohio-class has already been in service for decades, and the boats are already past their expected service life.

The first of four SSGNs, the USS Ohio (SSGN-726), was commissioned as far back as 1981.

Ohio-class SSGN. Image: Creative Commons.

Ohio-class SSGN. Image: Creative Commons.

Extending its service life would require additional maintenance, upkeep, and sustainment of critical systems such as electronics, weapons systems, computing, and even the hull itself.

But if the Navy could get the job done, it could sustain overwhelming firepower for many more years, giving time for the Block V Virginia-class boats to arrive.

A potential war against either Russia or China would likely require large amounts of firepower to attack air defenses, command and control structures, equipment, and force concentrations separated by hundreds of miles.

Any counterattack in response to a Russian or Chinese assault would need to overwhelm attacking forces with responsive sea-launched firepower.

About the Author: Kris Osborn 

Kris Osborn is the President of Warrior Maven – Center for Military Modernization. Osborn previously served at the Pentagon as a highly qualified expert in the Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army—Acquisition, Logistics & Technology. Osborn has also worked as an anchor and on-air military specialist at national TV networks. He has appeared as a guest military expert on Fox News, MSNBC, The Military Channel, and The History Channel. He also has a Masters Degree in Comparative Literature from Columbia University

Written By

Kris Osborn is the Military Technology Editor of 19FortyFive and President of Warrior Maven - Center for Military Modernization. Osborn previously served at the Pentagon as a Highly Qualified Expert with the Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army—Acquisition, Logistics & Technology. Osborn has also worked as an anchor and on-air military specialist at national TV networks. He has appeared as a guest military expert on Fox News, MSNBC, The Military Channel, and The History Channel. He also has a Masters Degree in Comparative Literature from Columbia University.

Advertisement