Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

The Embassy

How Joe Biden Willingly Walked Into a Showdown with Russia

Russia
F-15E Strike Eagles taxi into formation June 12, 2019, at Mountain Home Air Force Base, Idaho. This was a rare opportunity to capture the Gunfighter family, including the 391st, 389th and 428th Fighter Squadrons, before a morning flight. (U.S. Air Force photo by Staff Sergeant Jeremy L. Mosier)

Can Joe Biden Escape Russia’s Trap? Earlier this week, a winter storm briefly trapped US President Joe Biden aboard Air Force One. Thanks to Russian President Vladimir Putin, that hemmed-in feeling may have been uncomfortably familiar. Seemingly intent on forcing a diplomatic showdown with the West, the Russian strongman has arranged his pieces in such a way as to ensure he comes away with a king’s ransom.

Putin has already stationed some 100,000 additional troops near Ukraine, a number that could nearly double should he decide to open a new front. His terms for easing tensions are more like those of an armed robber demanding all the cash in the register rather than a negotiator staking out of a serious position. He has since warned of a “complete rupture” of relations if the West counters a further incursion into Ukraine with additional sanctions.

Upping the stakes further, Russia and Belarus last week announced a new round of war games planned for February/March. Belarus President Alexander Lukashenko had already announced his willingness to host Russian nuclear weapons.

Lukashenko’s attempt to destabilize Latvia, Lithuania, and Poland with a flood of refugees continues apace. The humanitarian crisis created by his hybrid warfare remains an ongoing headache for those nations. Poland for its part, continues to build a wall to secure its border, and Lithuania has begun paying migrants to return home, Belarus will keep the situation simmering.

Meanwhile, Putin is playing the energy card, cutting overland gas deliveries via Ukraine to their lowest levels in two years. This caused European gas prices to 30% jump 30%. Putin can afford to be patient while waiting for Nord Stream II certification, but this gives him leverage to ensure the current suspension of certification proceedings doesn’t become permanent.

In the Balkans, Russia continues to fan the flames of dismemberment, so ably lit by Republika Srpska’s Milorad Dodik, who is trying to create an independent army and intelligence service for Bosnia Serbs.

Why is Putin so intent on forcing a showdown now? Clearly, he believes the time is ripe.

The Biden administration has sent all the wrong signals since day one. After unilaterally capitulating on Nord Stream II, it engineered the humiliating and disorderly retreat from Afghanistan. Then, throughout the summer and fall, it sent a steady stream of envoys to Moscow, signaling a near desperate desire for accommodation.

The diplomatic pleadings will continue next week with a U.S.-Russia bilateral and the adjacent meetings of the NATO-Russia Council (NRC) and the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE). Under the current conditions, these high-level discussions are a mistake.

Putin’s list of demands for discussion are so outlandish they cannot possibly be met. Furthermore, it’s impossible to see how any reciprocal actions which the West would surely demand (say the return of Crimea to Ukraine) would ever be domestically palatable for the Kremlin.

Will Putin’s pressure campaign cow the West into offering concessions without reciprocity? Or will his absurd demands ensure the failure of negotiations, giving him a pretext for launching a new offensive against Ukraine?

Either way, it’s hard to see how the Biden administration emerges unscathed from the box it has willingly walked itself into.

What then to expect from next week’s slurry of meetings? Not much. I believe Russia’s opening salvo likely poisoned the well for any sort of agreement.

If events in Kazakhstan continue to snowball, they could convince the Kremlin not to move further in Ukraine, but that would come at some risk for Putin. Domestically, he’s committed to an outcome: either further territorial gains in Ukraine, or a prize offered up by the West in exchange for de-escalation.

Putin has constructed a diplomatic box to squeeze and divide the west. Biden should never have stepped into it, but that’s water over the dam, now.

What remains is Western resolve. The U.S. must approach next week’s meetings with Russia from a position of strength. It must: pledge to install a long-overdue permanent military presence in an eastern European NATO ally; refuse to cave on NATO’s open-door policy; calmly and resolutely refute Russian propaganda around NATO encirclement; make it known that further incursions will set off a concerted effort to target oligarch money stashed away in the West; and maintain a united front with our European allies.

Putin sees the U.S. under President Biden as weak. He must come away convinced that the costs of any further aggression against Ukraine have risen and now outweigh the domestic embarrassment of backing off the high noon drama of his own creation.

Daniel Kochis is a senior policy analyst in European Affairs in the Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom. He specializes in trans-Atlantic security issues regularly publishing on U.S. policy in Europe, NATO, U.S.-Russia relations, and Arctic issues. Kochis is also a regional author for the Heritage Foundation’s annual Index of U.S. Military Strength.

Written By

Daniel Kochis is a senior policy analyst in European Affairs in the Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom. He specializes in trans-Atlantic security issues regularly publishing on U.S. policy in Europe, NATO, U.S.-Russia relations, and Arctic issues. Kochis is also a regional author for the Heritage Foundation’s annual Index of U.S. Military Strength.

7 Comments

7 Comments

  1. Slack

    January 6, 2022 at 11:35 pm

    Biden must be careful.Don’t ever be blindsided by a punch you totally failed to foresee.

    russia might today look weak and insignificant compared to a post-Brexit chair-kicking Britain or an increasingly shrill right-wing Norway, but its military packs a powerful punch, like what Mike Tyson once had, just only 10,000 more powerful.

  2. Eric Anderson

    January 7, 2022 at 12:16 pm

    Sorry, Ukraine. You are not worth the sacrifice of America’s youth. The US should only commit its military only when the threat is so substantial the American people demand it. Guaranteeing the safety of our “friends” is a nice sentiment. But short of the threat being deeply felt by the American people, any commitment we make will not last.

    Think WWII vs. Vietnam.

  3. Chris Cha

    January 7, 2022 at 3:22 pm

    We have an occupant in the White House who is supremely confident in his knowledge and capabilities, but who, in fact, has not been on the right side of any foreign policy issue for the last 50 years.

  4. Myron Krajnyk

    January 7, 2022 at 3:57 pm

    Let me be blunt and to the point . American “ leadership “ ; be it moral , political , or in its stated fundamental values / freedom , espoused of over the years , is currently at risk. If it fails in its commitment ,to uphold its stated values , to give credible military , financial , ie.( world banking systems) , as well as diplomatic ( UN ) , previous internationally agreed norms) , then it will be seen , by the world community , as a fraud and a totally unreliable friend /ally to all of nations , in the world; laid bare. . The question would immediately be Who , , in their right mind , would ever trust us , in the future??? It would embolden our enemies and increase the probability of additional aggressions throughout the world against other , sovereign , nations. Remember the Nazi/ Czechoslovak appeasement in 1938?.This lack of a proper response against everything that post war, civilized society , has stood for , will precipitate the disintegration of a viable , peaceful organization ,( the UN ) and accelerate the march towards the final demise of mankind and unleashing upon the world of WW Three.

  5. Doug Gault

    January 8, 2022 at 8:27 am

    Bidens only attempting to protect his tax sheltered investments & holdings in the Ukraine. That’s his own personal investment. And not worth a single American life or drop of blood. Let alone worth the investment of USA military assistance.

    From one Americans perspective NATO is a failure

  6. Alex

    January 9, 2022 at 5:41 am

    The United States did not understand that Russia does not care about their opinion and that Russia will be able to kick the ass to the entire Alliance on its territory.

  7. dave

    January 9, 2022 at 8:00 pm

    I think you might be wrong. Putin has an agenda to push and he might see Biden as an American leader able to make changes he wants while most American presidents are to concerned with re election to make such changes.

    Leaving Afghanistan is a good example if this in practice. He may not see Biden as ‘weak’ but rather as someone capable of making the big changes he is pushing for.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Advertisement