Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Uncategorized

Just Stop: Russia’s Claim of Chemical, Bio Labs in Ukraine Is Garbage

Russia WMD
A U.S. Army combat medic assigned to Regional Health Command-Europe, secures a simulated casualty on a stretcher while under a simulated chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear attack during the 21st Theater Sustainment Command Best Medic Competition in Baumholder, Germany, Aug. 22, 2019. (U.S. Army photo by Sgt. Jesse Pilgrim)

We need to look at all of the facts. In the latest in a series of specious and outlandish justifications for its illegal, immoral, and brutal invasion of sovereign Ukraine, Russia is claiming that Washington and Kyiv are working together to develop chemical and biological weapons.

Pure Putin propaganda.

Indeed, according to the U.S. State Department this week:

The United States does not own or operate any chemical or biological laboratories in Ukraine, it is in full compliance with its obligations under the Chemical Weapons Convention and Biological Weapons Convention, and it does not develop or possess such weapons anywhere.

On the other hand, the State Department notes:

It is Russia that has active chemical and biological weapons programs and is in violation of the Chemical Weapons Convention and Biological Weapons Convention.

No surprises in that State Department claim, considering that Russian operatives have used the Novichok nerve agent to attack former Russian intelligence officer Sergei Skripal and Russian political dissident Alexei Navalny in recent years.

Russia has also shamelessly supported the regime of Syria’s Bashar Assad, which has used a variety of chemical weapons against Syrian civilians in the brutal civil war there.

With the war in Ukraine in a stalemate that includes significant losses for the Russian forces in the face of stiff Ukrainian political and military resistance, Russia is looking for ways to reenergize its political and military campaign to subjugate Ukraine.

To do this, Moscow might develop a “false flag” operation, involving the use of chemical (or less likely biological) weapons in Ukraine against Russian forces, ethnic Russians in Ukraine, or even Ukrainian civilians.

The attack could possibly be choreographed to look like it was supposedly executed by Ukrainian forces.

An even more elaborate Russian operation might try to finger U.S. or NATO forces, rather than Ukrainian forces, as being the perpetrators of such a heinous act, which would almost assuredly include examples of those supposedly killed by the weapons.

Such a contrived act would likely take place on Ukrainian territory currently controlled by Russian forces, such as the eastern Ukrainian region of the Donbas.

The false flag operation could be used to “change the channel” on Russian brutality in Ukraine in the international information space. Indeed, the Chinese are reportedly parroting this Russian propaganda about weapons labs.

A false flag operation could also be used to burnish the image of the Russian armed forces at home, where the Russian people are being fed a steady diet of propaganda about the Ukraine invasion.

Even more troubling, the false flag operation could be used to justify an escalation in the use of force and violence in Ukraine.

Based on Biden administration statements, likely supported by the U.S. and other intelligence, the Kremlin would use any trick in the book to justify its unjustifiable war in Ukraine—including the use of weapons of mass destruction.

Peter Brookes is a senior research fellow, focusing on weapons of mass destruction and counter-proliferation, in the Davis Institute for National Security and Foreign Policy at The Heritage Foundation.

Written By

Peter Brookes is a senior research fellow, focusing on weapons of mass destruction and counter proliferation, in the Davis Institute for National Security and Foreign Policy at The Heritage Foundation.

Advertisement