Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Smart Bombs: Military, Defense and National Security

Meet Russia’s Su-35: Is Russia Best Fighter Jet Dying in Ukraine?

Su-35 Russia Ukraine
Russian Air Force Su-35. Image Credit: Creative Commons.

Is Russia’s Su-35 Fighter as Superior As Its Reputation Says? – Russia’s Su-35 Flanker-E has a mixed record in Ukraine. It has reportedly been shot down by surface-to-air missiles and maybe even a MiG-29 destroyed at least one in a dogfight. It has since adjusted its tactics to focus on suppressing Ukrainian air defenses rather than just executing air superiority missions. The Sukhoi Su-35 has been hyped as a fourth-generation ‘++’ fighter – not stealthy – but still a powerhouse in the skies.

Let’s take a closer look at what the Su-35 has been up to in the war in Ukraine and see if it is living up to its reputation.

Trouble in Contested Skies

A confrontation with at least one Ukrainian MiG-29 and S-300 surface-to-air missile didn’t go well for the Su-35S in early March. The Ukrainian military claimed two of the Flanker-E fighters were shot down. The Su-35S should be superior to the MiG-29, but in this dogfight (if reports are true), it appears that pilots on the Ukrainian side got the best of the Russians. “So far, the enemy predominates in the number and quality of the aircraft and weaponry, but not the skills,” the Ukrainian military said.

Taking Out Enemy Radar to Incapacitate Air Defenses

Besides dogfighting, the Su-35S airplanes began to execute suppression of enemy air defense missions. On March 8, the Russian Ministry of Defense released a photo of a Su-35S with two anti-radiation missiles, according to Janes.

The Su-35S was armed with Kh-31P missiles in order to destroy radar installations. The Kh-31P is a supersonic weapon that travels at MACH 1.8 and is supposed to be impervious to countermeasures.

Su-35 Engines Make It Agile

The Su-35S is actually based on the Su-27M. But the Su-35S has better thrust-vectoring engines. Twin Saturn AL-41F1S turbofans give the Su-35 agility to outrun other fourth-generation fighters. The twin engines provide the fighter with a maximum speed of 1,550 mph and a ceiling of 59,050 feet. These specs are supposed to make the Su-35 super maneuverable in aerial combat.

Su-35 Is Well-Armed, As You Would Expect from a Fourth-Generation ‘++’ Fighter

The airplane can carry a full complement of missiles and smart bombs. This includes a 30mm autocannon. There is 17,630 pounds of payload with 12-external points. It deploys a diverse range of air-to-air, air-to-ground, the afore-mentioned anti-radiation, plus anti-ship missiles. Smart munitions include TV, laser, and satellite-guided bombs. The Su-35S can also perform close air support which it exhibited during the Russian intervention in the Syrian civil war.

More Features Stand Out

The Su-35S also has a modern avionics suite. Its Irbis-E passive electronically scanned array radar can track as many as 30-targets at a range of around 217-miles. The Su-35S has strength in numbers.  According to Military Watch Magazine, “With the Su-35 designed to operate in large squadrons and share target data through data links, the situational awareness for a full unit will be far greater than that for a single aircraft.”

Skies Over Ukraine Are Still Contested

By now the Russian air force was supposed to have created air superiority in the skies. That hasn’t happened as the Ukrainian fighter pilots and air defenses have proved their mettle. It’s curious to see how well the Su-35S handles this unexpected adversity. Russian pilots may have come into the conflict over-confident. They also did not foresee the power of the S-300 SAM system. The Russians must be concerned about this development, and this has been exhibited by their use of anti-radiation missiles.

So, the Su-35S will have to be given a ‘C’ grade so far in the conflict. It has not dominated the skies – if reports of its difficulties in dogfighting are true. It should outfly a MiG-29 with no difficulty, so the responsibility lies with the pilots. But there will be ample time for the Russian aviators to adjust in-flight tactics as this war grinds on.

Now serving as 1945’s Defense and National Security Editor, Brent M. Eastwood, Ph.D., is the author of Humans, Machines, and Data: Future Trends in Warfare. He is an Emerging Threats expert and former U.S. Army Infantry officer. You can follow him on Twitter @BMEastwood.

Written By

Now serving as 1945s New Defense and National Security Editor, Brent M. Eastwood, PhD, is the author of Humans, Machines, and Data: Future Trends in Warfare. He is an Emerging Threats expert and former U.S. Army Infantry officer.



  1. Alex

    March 30, 2022 at 11:42 am

    I don’t know how you can pretend to be a journalist and be guided only by false Ukrainian data.
    But this is your own business.
    It is interesting that the SU-35 was never shot down, while the SU-35 itself destroyed several S-27s, SU-24s, SU-25s, MiG-29s of the old Ukrainian ones. That is, for which he rose into the sky, he completed all the tasks perfectly. Ukarinsky air defense was destroyed irrevocably: 173 air defense installations out of 182.
    I understand about the order to belittle all Russian weapons, but this is too clumsy, stupid and not believable 🙂

  2. zelensky

    April 16, 2022 at 11:21 am

    they both were posted form computer games and stimulation

  3. Tmu

    August 20, 2022 at 12:00 pm

    Hi Alex,

    Six months later and nothing you said is accurate. You seem to believe the Kremlin numbers, and if you believe them, then Ukrainian Air Force is annihilated several times over already. Of course we know that is not true. What we can find is several burned wreckages of Su30s, Su34s and SU-35s, kinda hard to fake a burned wreckage don’t you think?

    I think the only conclusion is SU-35 has seriously underperformed in Ukraine. The obsolete but brave Ukrainian Air Force is still putting up a fight against the Russian Air Force with obsolete fighters and out of date mussels. SU-35 sales have performed poorly, but this might seal the deal of nobody wanting to purchase this jet. If I was India, I’d take a serious look at the competitors after this performance.

    So, if Ukrainian Air Force had more modern jets, I’d expect catastrophic results for the Russians. I think Ukraine will get F-16s eventually, that should seal the deal for Russian dreams of air superiority (which they can’t seem to achieve even when fighting obsolete Mig-29s).

    Disclaimer: it is possible that it is not the machines fault, but simply the training of Russian pilots is substandard. This is not so easy to remedy if you are using obsolete tactics and flight hours in cockpit is just way too low.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *