Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Smart Bombs: Military, Defense and National Security

U.S. Army’s New M1E3 Tank Is Built to Fight Drones and It Might Fire Lasers

U.S. Soldiers assigned to 1st Battalion, 9th Cavalry Regiment, 2nd Armored Brigade Combat Team, 1st Cavalry Division fire an M1 Abrams main battle tank at an enemy target during Rotation 25-02 at the National Training Center, Fort Irwin, Calif., Nov. 07, 2024. Rotations at the National Training Center ensure Army Brigade Combat Teams remain versatile, responsive, and consistently available for current and future contingencies. (U.S. Army photo by Spc. Casey Auman, Operations Group, National Training Center).
U.S. Soldiers assigned to 1st Battalion, 9th Cavalry Regiment, 2nd Armored Brigade Combat Team, 1st Cavalry Division fire an M1 Abrams main battle tank at an enemy target during Rotation 25-02 at the National Training Center, Fort Irwin, Calif., Nov. 07, 2024. Rotations at the National Training Center ensure Army Brigade Combat Teams remain versatile, responsive, and consistently available for current and future contingencies. (U.S. Army photo by Spc. Casey Auman, Operations Group, National Training Center).

Drone attacks from the air, top-down anti-tank guided missiles, hit-and-run ambushes from dispersed groups of armed soldiers, and long-range enemy missiles and tank rounds…. are a few of the threats the Army’s new M1E3 60-ton tank will need to address. A few months back, 19FortyFive was able to spend a lot of time with the new tank, and we present many of our best photos from that visit in this essay. 

The M1E3 Tank Is the Future 

M1E3

M1E3 Abrams Tank at the Detroit Auto Show. 19FortyFive.com Original Image.

M1E3 Abrams Tank. Taken by 19FortyFive.com

M1E3 Abrams Tank. Taken by 19FortyFive.com

The explosion of AI and drone warfare is massively reshaping the landscape of modern warfare, and the success of anti-armor weapons has led some to posit that perhaps the main battle tank has become obsolete

Perhaps heavy armor is simply too vulnerable to dismounted anti-armor weapons and drones to be considered relevant in modern war

The U.S. Army is seeking to address this problem and surge forward with a main battle tank adapted to a modern AI- and drone-capable threat environment. 

One thing seems clear: with the tactical and technological adjustments necessary to accommodate modern warfare, the main battle tank is going nowhere.

There is no other way to fully “breach” an enemy perimeter, maneuver to contact, and actually seize and hold ground

Despite the success of anti-armor weapons and the destruction of tanks in the war in Ukraine, the arrival of heavily armored vehicles did help the Ukrainians take back ground from Russia during their previous counteroffensive. 

M1E3 Abrams Tank. Taken by 19FortyFive.com

M1E3 Abrams Tank. Taken by 19FortyFive.com

M1E3

M1E3 Abrams Tank. Taken by 19FortyFive.com

New Generation of Tank

Some of the specific weapons, sensors, and countermeasures being integrated into the Army’s new tank are likely unavailable for security reasons, yet there is a wide range of threats the new platform will need to counter. 

One useful way to consider potential requirements for the M1E3 is to examine the challenge areas associated with the 70-ton Abrams tanks, which the Army’s new platform may be well positioned to address. 

There are several key areas of focus, including on-board electrical power, weight and mobility, vulnerability to anti-armor weapons, deployability difficulties, and countering the drone attack threat.  

For context, it seems worth noting that the Abrams tank has indeed proven invaluable in armored combat and achieved many historic battlefield successes, such as its ability to destroy Iraqi T-72s in the Gulf War. 

It has a massive psychological “deterrent” effect, and a heavy tank may be one of the few ways to truly “take” and “hold” enemy territory, something which was again demonstrated in Ukraine. 

M1E3 Tank at the Detroit Auto Show. Image Credit: Creative Commons.

M1E3 Tank at the Detroit Auto Show. Image Credit: 19FortyFive.

M1E3 Tank at the Detroit Auto Show

M1E3 Tank at the Detroit Auto Show. Image Credit: 19FortyFive.com

The Abrams has also had success with Auxiliary Power Units designed to bring necessary increases in on-board power to support sensing, computing, and C4ISR. Add-on armor kits improved survivability, and the Abrams can now fire an advanced Multi-Purpose 120mm round that combines multiple blast effects into a single munition. 

For these and many other reasons, the Abrams tank is likely here to stay for many years, particularly given its growing ability to network with unmanned systems and improve survivability through top-down protection, drone launch, and AI-enabled sensing, targeting, and computing.  

Tanks are often distinguished by the range and fidelity of their “thermal sights,” something which enabled Abrams tanks to “see” and “target” Iraqi tanks from undetected distances during the Gulf War.  

This dynamic is likely why the M1A2 SEP v3 was engineered with 3rd-generation FLIR (forward-looking infrared) targeting technology, which brought breakthrough range and resolution to modern combat.

Tank Adaptations: Maybe Lasers?

The adaptations to the Abrams, which have taken place progressively over many years, sought to address the kinds of deficits, liabilities, and technical challenges that required upgrades to the platform; these areas of challenge are likely closely intertwined with the technologies and strategies informing M1E3 development.  

M1E3

Photo taken on 1/17/2026 of the M1E3 Tank at the Detroit Auto Show. Image by 19FortyFive, All Rights Reserved.

M1E3 Tank from the Detroit Auto Show. Photo Taken By 19FortyFive Staff on 1/17/2026.

M1E3 Tank from the Detroit Auto Show. Photo Taken By 19FortyFive Staff on 1/17/2026.

Therefore, the M1E3 is much faster and lighter at 60 tons, and therefore better suited for deployment and expeditionary operations. 

A smaller, lighter, faster tank will also, of course, be positioned to maneuver through urban areas, transit over bridges that existing Abrams can’t transit, and pass through narrowly configured passageways. 

Ideally, the M1E3’s lighter weight can be achieved without compromising the Abrams tanks’ classic survivability, perhaps through the discovery of lightweight composite armor materials or a new generation of Active Protection Systems.  

Speed itself is, of course, also a survivability-enhancing characteristic, and it’s likely the M1E3 is engineered with advanced, hemispheric APS better positioned to counter drone attack and top-down anti-armor strikes. 

Counter-UAS must be a massive priority with the M1E3, given the extent to which tanks have been decimated in Ukraine by drones able to loiter then “attack” tanks from the air. 

These kinds of C-UAS technologies likely involve both kinetic interceptor missiles, APS-fired rounds to “stop” incoming munitions, and possibly even lasers designed to incinerate or disable drones directly from the vehicle. 

EW, Lasers & Hybrid Electric Power  

Perhaps of even greater importance, it is nearly a certainty that the M1E3 will operate with new generations of EW, as advanced systems can now help deconflict the spectrum, identify enemy signatures and RF signals, and “jam,” “disable” or even “take over” attacking drones. 

High-Powered Microwave weapons are also emerging quickly as a key area of focus when it comes to the challenges associated with countering drone attacks. It would not be surprising to learn that the M1E3 operates with AI-enabled C-UAS and threat-oriented computing able to find, verify, and validate targets and pair them with an optimal countermeasure or effector … in milliseconds. 

M1E3

M1E3 from the Detroit Auto Show. Taken by 19FortyFive.com on 1/17/2026.

By operating with a diesel-electric hybrid engine, the M1A3 will not only be more fuel-efficient and operate with silent “watch” capability, but will also benefit from large on-board electrical power generated by the diesel-electric engine. 

This will provide the necessary on-board power to support electronics, sensors, targeting, and AI-enabled computing at lighter weights without adding APUs.

Perhaps the largest area of difference with the M1A3 will be its ability to operate with ground and air robotic “wingmen” unmanned platforms and drones able to deliver ammunition, conduct highly critical reconnaissance and ISR in forward, hostile areas, and even launch attacks when directed by a human. 

This greatly improves the survivability equation and can enable the M1A3 to operate almost like an extremely lethal, forward-operating, multi-domain command-and-control platform, capable of directing attacks from the forward edge of combat. 

About the Author: Kris Osborn 

Kris Osborn is the Military Technology Editor of 19FortyFive. Osborn is also President of Warrior Maven – Center for Military Modernization. Osborn previously served at the Pentagon as a highly qualified expert in the Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army—Acquisition, Logistics & Technology. Osborn has also worked as an anchor and on-air military specialist at national TV networks. He has appeared as a guest military expert on Fox News, MSNBC, The Military Channel, and The History Channel. He also has a Masters Degree in Comparative Literature from Columbia University

Written By

Harry J. Kazianis (@Grecianformula) is Editor-In-Chief of 19FortyFive and National Security Journal. Kazianis recently served as Senior Director of National Security Affairs at the Center for the National Interest. He also served as Executive Editor of its publishing arm, The National Interest. Kazianis has held various roles at The National Interest, including Senior Editor and Managing Editor over the last decade. Harry is a recognized expert on national security issues involving North & South Korea, China, the Asia-Pacific, Europe, and general U.S. foreign policy and national security challenges. Past Experience Kazianis previously served as part of the foreign policy team for the 2016 presidential campaign of Senator Ted Cruz. Kazianis also managed the foreign policy communications efforts of the Heritage Foundation, served as Editor-In-Chief of the Tokyo-based The Diplomat magazine, Editor of RealClearDefense, and as a WSD-Handa Fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS): PACNET. Kazianis has also held foreign policy fellowships at the Potomac Foundation and the University of Nottingham. Kazianis is the author of the book The Tao of A2/AD, an exploration of China’s military capabilities in the Asia-Pacific region. He has also authored several reports on U.S. military strategy in the Asia-Pacific as well as edited and co-authored a recent report on U.S.-Japan-Vietnam trilateral cooperation. Kazianis has provided expert commentary, over 900 op-eds, and analysis for many outlets, including The Telegraph, The Wall Street Journal, Yonhap, The New York Times, Hankyoreh, The Washington Post, MSNBC, 1945, Fox News, Fox Business, CNN, USA Today, CNBC, Politico, The Financial Times, NBC, Slate, Reuters, AP, The Washington Examiner, The Washington Times, RollCall, RealClearPolitics, LA Times, Newsmax, BBC, Foreign Policy, The Hill, Fortune, Forbes, DefenseOne, Newsweek, NPR, Popular Mechanics, VOA, Yahoo News, National Security Journal and many others.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Advertisement