The Bradley Fighting Vehicle Can Beat Anything on the Battlefield, But Father Time Is Calling
The Bradley Fighting Vehicle, introduced in 1981, is a key U.S. armored platform with a strong combat record in the Gulf War, Iraq War, and the ongoing Russo-Ukrainian War. The United States has furnished more than 300 Bradleys to the Ukrainians, where they’ve been used to great effect.
It is highly regarded for its Bushmaster 25mm chain gun and TOW missile firepower, and was responsible for destroying more enemy armor than M1 Abrams tanks during Desert Storm.
M2 Bradley. Image Credit: Creative Commons.
The Bradley Infantry Fighting Vehicle (IFV) has had a long, distinguished career.
It has a tremendous track record as the premier IFV in the world.
Punching Above Its Weight In Ukraine
On the battlefields in Ukraine, Ukrainian infantry soldiers love the Bradley for its firepower, survivability, and cross-country movement. Like the M1 Abrams series of tanks, the venerable M2 Bradley’s 40+ years of service have been sustained by enhancements that have upgraded the vehicle.
The Bradley has been used in Ukraine to great effect against the Russian invasion. It won’t be a surprise to see the US send them even more Bradleys in the future, as they have expressed their confidence in it.
The Bradleys have been very effective in suppressing Russian trenches and fixed positions during Ukrainian infantry attacks. The Bushmaster 25mm chain-gun fires about 200 rounds a minute.
In one incredible scenario, two Bradleys met a Russian T-90 main battle tank in a battle in 2024. The T-90 was trying to maneuver to get a shot at the Bradleys in a close-quarters battle. The Bradleys’ turret rotates much faster, and they pour fire into the Russian tank.
While the 25mm rounds don’t penetrate the armor, they set off one of the T-90’s explosive reactive armor tiles, and then pepper the turret of the T-90, completely disorienting the crew and knocking out the optics for the tank commander and gunner. The T-90 fires a couple of wild shots before crashing.
The Bradley, when used correctly within a Combined Arms approach, remains a very effective vehicle. Despite the massive drone usage in Ukraine, it has shown this to be true.
The Bradley Fighting Vehicle cuts loose several rounds from the 25mm main gun on the orchard Combat Training Center Range.
Soldiers completed training this week of the Bradley Commanders Course with the 204th Regional Training Institute, (RTI), of the Idaho Army National Guard on Gowen Field. The course is designed to train active duty, reserve and national guard officers and non-commissioned officers in combat critical M3 Bradley Fighting Vehicle Commander Skills. Field exercises were conducted on the newest Range 10, the Digital Air Ground Integrated Range (DAGIR), on the Orchard Combat Training Center grounds.
However, the Bradley isn’t invulnerable to anti-tank guided missiles, drones, artillery, and mines, and over 90 have been lost in combat.
The Bradley Has Seen Its Share of Combat
The M2/M3 Bradley Fighting Vehicle (BFV) is an American tracked armored fighting vehicle developed by FMC Corporation and now manufactured by BAE Systems Land & Armaments. It is named for U.S. General of the Army Omar Bradley of World War II fame.
The M2 Bradley has seen combat in conflicts such as the Gulf War, Iraq War, and others such as the current Russian invasion of Ukraine. During the Gulf War, it proved effective against Iraqi armor but suffered significant friendly-fire losses, leading to post-war survivability upgrades.
Later, during the Iraq War, the Bradley was more vulnerable to asymmetric threats like improvised explosive devices (IEDs) and rocket-propelled grenades (RPGs) in an urban environment.
The M2/M3 Bradley Design
The Bradley is designed to transport infantry or cavalry scouts with armor protection, while providing covering fire to suppress enemy troops and armored vehicles.
Variants include the M2 Bradley infantry fighting vehicle and the M3 Bradley reconnaissance vehicle. The M2 holds a crew of three—a commander, a gunner, and a driver—along with six fully equipped soldiers.
The M3 mainly conducts scout missions and carries two scout troopers in addition to the regular crew of three, with space for additional BGM-71 TOW missiles.
The Bradley has served in several wars over the past 35 years and remains the Army’s primary infantry fighting vehicle.
Currently, the Army has about 4,500 M2 and M3 Bradleys spread among its units, including those in the Army National Guard, as well as another approximately 2,000 in storage, according to The International Institute for Strategic Studies’ The Military Balance.
Design History
It would be surprising to most people to learn that the design and development of the M-2 Bradley Fighting Vehicle began in the early 1960s, right about the time that the M-113 was incorporated into the US Army.
In 1964, the Army recognized that in a future war in Europe would require an infantry fighting vehicle that would have a turret with a 20mm cannon, a 7.62mm machine gun, five sealed firing ports for infantry troops inside, and a sealed hull for protection against NBC elements (nuclear, biological, chemical), and have enough speed to keep up with the new M-1 tank that was in development.
In 1967, the Soviets released the BMP-1, which in Russian is Boyevaya Mashina Pyekhoty (infantry fighting vehicle), which was sealed against NBC contaminants, had a 73mm gun, firing ports, and was fast enough to keep up with the Soviet armor. This compelled the Army to once again look at the MICV (mechanized infantry combat vehicle).
M2 Bradley
Different prototypes were tested and rejected, including the excellent German Marder IFV.
In October 1976, the Army would combine the roles of scout and IFV, as the previous Armored Reconnaissance Scout Vehicle had been canceled. The Army agreed to make the armor protection comparable to the earlier prototype, XM723. The TBAT-II turret, with its 25 mm Bushmaster cannon and a TOW missile launcher, would be used on both vehicles.
The following year, the IFV was renamed the XM2, and the cavalry scout was named the XM3.
The XM2/3 passed the Army Systems Acquisition Review Council Milestone III review in 1979. In December 1979, the XM2 and XM3 were type classified as the M2 and M3, respectively. Final approval for production was granted by the Secretary of Defense in February 1980.
In October 1981, the vehicle was named the “Bradley” for World War II Army General Omar Bradley, who had died earlier that year.
US Combat History Of The M2/M3 Bradley
Despite its initial unpopularity among troops when it was introduced, with many infantry troops derisively calling it a “recycled Budweiser can” because of its aluminum construction, the Bradley silenced its critics with a stellar record in its first wartime action. It proved that it could protect its troops and deliver them safely to the battlefield while delivering devastating firepower against the enemy.
U.S. Army Soldiers with the 3rd Battalion, 66th Armored Regiment, 1st Infantry Division, participated in a battalion wide training event consisting of attacking and defending Bradley Fighting Vehicles and M1 Abrams Main Battle Tanks, on Fort Riley, February 4, 2024. The defending teams dug hasty trench defenses to further conceal and provide cover for their tanks. (U.S. Army Photo by Spc. Kenneth Barnet)
During Desert Storm in 1991, over 2,200 Bradleys were deployed into combat, and only three were lost to enemy fire. The M2 Bradley fighting vehicle played a crucial role in Operation Desert Storm, demonstrating its battlefield effectiveness through a combination of speed, firepower, and armor. It was vital in the ground assault, playing a key part in clearing paths and destroying more Iraqi armored vehicles than the M1 Abrams tanks.
Although some Bradleys were lost (mostly to friendly fire), casualties remained relatively light, solidifying its legacy as a successful combat vehicle.
However, changes were adopted after Desert Storm to improve the Bradleys. A GPS capability was added, along with anti-tank missile countermeasures, improved ammunition storage, and redesigned seating.
Enhancements made during the M2A3/M3A3 production models included a flat-panel display unit for the commander, squad display units for the troops in the vehicle’s rear, a driver display unit, and a mass memory unit.
During the second Gulf War, the Bradley enjoyed early success alongside the M1A2 Abrams during a combined-arms invasion. But after the conflict turned into an asymmetrical insurgency, many Bradleys (about 150) were lost in street fighting with close contact firefights with insurgents using RPGs and small anti-tank weapons.
Engineers with the 116th Brigade Engineer Battalion conduct M2A3 Bradley fighting vehicle gunnery qualification on March 27, 2018, Orchard Combat Training Center, south of Boise, Idaho. Combat engineers with the 116th BEB trained through gunnery table XII, evaluating their ability to execute collective platoon-level tasks in a tactical live-fire environment; including integrating dismounted soldiers with their assigned BFV. (U.S. Army National Guard photo by 1LT Robert Barney)
The Army has done a good job of expanding its service life to meet challenges as they develop. The Bradley, despite the early misgivings of the troops, proved to be an outstanding vehicle that continues to punch above its weight.
In the fighting in Ukraine, it is the M2 Bradley, not the M1 Abrams who is the real winner on the battlefield.
MORE – The SR-71 Could Hit MACH 3 and Trick Enemy Radar With Fake Copies of Itself.
About the Author: Steve Balestrieri
Steve Balestrieri is a National Security Columnist. He served as a US Army Special Forces NCO and Warrant Officer. In addition to writing on defense, he covers the NFL for PatsFans.com and is a member of the Pro Football Writers of America (PFWA). His work was regularly featured in many military publications.
